Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Determinants of the Digital Orientation of Small Businesses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Corporate Sustainability in the Digital Era

Abstract

A company oriented toward digitalization recognizes digital resources throughout the company and integrates them with value creation. Digital orientation, formed by a combination of market orientation, entrepreneurial orientation, relationship orientation, and technology orientation, is thus considered as a top strategic priority for companies to stay competitive. Prior studies call for further evidence on what determines the digital orientation of small businesses. We study the conditions under which small companies are likely to pursue different digital orientations, and which types of companies are most probably involved in embracing different digital orientations. The results show that the companies that have digitality well represented in their strategy embrace digital orientation more than the companies that do not have digitality well represented in their strategy. Also, companies’ willingness to grow affects the level of digital orientation, whereas competitive intensity in markets does not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., & de Reuver, M. (2019). Digitalization, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalizing SMEs? Telecommunications Policy, 43, 101828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camilleri, M. A. (2018). The SMEs’ technology acceptance of digital media for stakeholder engagement. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 26(4), 504–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cenamor, J., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2019). How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity. Journal of Business Research, 100, 196–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cha, K. J., Hwang, T., & Gregor, S. (2015). An integrative model of IT-enabled organizational transformation: A multiple case study. Management Decision, 53(8), 1755–1770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. E., Pan, S. L., & Ouyang, T. H. (2014). Routine reconfiguration in traditional companies’ e-commerce strategy implementation: A trajectory perspective. Information & Management, 51(2), 270–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, S. H., & Lin, H. N. (2015). Co-creating e-service innovations: Theory, practice, and impact on firm performance. International Journal of Information Management, 35(3), 277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, M., & Pan, S. L. (2015). Developing focal capabilities for e-commerce adoption: A resource orchestration perspective. Information & Management, 52(2), 200–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. M. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, R., & Tansuhaj, P. (2001). Building organizational capabilities for managing economic crisis: The role of market orientation and strategic flexibility. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Härtel, C. E., & O’Connor, J. M. (2014). Contextualizing research: Putting context back into organizational behavior research. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(4), 417–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, J., Plewa, C., & Lu, V. N. (2016). Examining strategic orientation complementarity using multiple regression analysis and fuzzy set QCA. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2199–2205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., & Marton, A. (2013). The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 357–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen, D. J., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., & Slater, S. F. (2007). Toward greater understanding of market orientation and the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 28(9), 961–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khin, S., & Ho, T. C. (2019). Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: A mediating role of digital innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(2), 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, N., & Pae, J. H. (2007). Utilization of new technologies: Organizational adaptation to business environments. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(2), 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, N., Im, S., & Slater, S. F. (2013). Impact of knowledge type and strategic orientation on new product creativity and advantage in high-technology firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1), 136–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laforet, S. (2008). Size, strategic, and market orientation affects on innovation. Journal of Business Research, 61(7), 753–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laforet, S. (2009). Effects of size, market and strategic orientation on innovation in non-high-tech manufacturing SMEs. European Journal of Marketing, 43(1/2), 188–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerch, C., & Gotsch, M. (2015). Digitalized product-service systems in manufacturing firms: A case study analysis. Research-Technology Management, 58(5), 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., Su, F., Zhang, W., & Mao, J. Y. (2018). Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capability perspective. Information Systems Journal, 28(6), 1129–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mithas, S., Tafti, A., & Mitchell, W. (2013). How a firm’s competitive environment and digital strategic posture influence digital business strategy. MIS Quarterly, 37, 511–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayides, P. M. (2007). The impact of organizational learning on relationship orientation, logistics service effectiveness and performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(1), 68–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinton, S., Canhoto, A., Molinillo, S., Pera, R., & Budhathoki, T. (2018). Conceptualising a digital orientation: Antecedents of supporting SME performance in the digital economy. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 26(5), 427–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, A., & Perrini, F. (2010). Investigating stakeholder theory and social capital: CSR in large firms and SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunila, M., Ukko, J., & Rantala, T. (2019). Value co-creation through digital service capabilities: The role of human factors. Information Technology and People, 32(3), 627–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R., & Christensen, S. (1995). The institutional construction of organisations: International and longitudinal studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taiminen, H. M., & Karjaluoto, H. (2015). The usage of digital marketing channels in SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 22(4), 633–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodosiou, M., Kehagias, J., & Katsikea, E. (2012). Strategic orientations, marketing capabilities and firm performance: An empirical investigation in the context of frontline managers in service organizations. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(7), 1058–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P., Williams, R., & Thomas, B. (2013). Are UK SMEs with active web sites more likely to achieve both innovation and growth? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(4), 934–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ukko, J., Nasiri, M., Saunila, M., & Rantala, T. (2019). Sustainability strategy as a moderator in the relationship between digital business strategy and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valtakoski, A., & Witell, L. (2018). Service capabilities and servitized SME performance: Contingency on firm age. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(4), 1144–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P., & Woerner, S. L. (2015). Thriving in an increasingly digital ecosystem. MIT Sloan Management Review, 56(4), 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Jr., Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012). Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organization Science, 23(5), 1398–1408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LUT University, Lappeenranta, Finland

    Minna Saunila, Mina Nasiri, Juhani Ukko & Tero Rantala

Authors
  1. Minna Saunila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mina Nasiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juhani Ukko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tero Rantala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minna Saunila .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

    Seung Ho Park

  2. Universidad EAFIT, Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia

    Maria Alejandra Gonzalez-Perez

  3. Universidade do Vale do ItajaĂ­, ItajaĂ­, Brazil

    Dinorá Eliete Floriani

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Saunila, M., Nasiri, M., Ukko, J., Rantala, T. (2021). Determinants of the Digital Orientation of Small Businesses. In: Park, S.H., Gonzalez-Perez, M.A., Floriani, D.E. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Corporate Sustainability in the Digital Era. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42412-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation