Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Partnerships and Activism: Community Safety, Multi-agency Partnerships and Safeguarding Victims

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Victimology

Abstract

This chapter focuses on multi-agency partnerships as a means of exploring the ways in which activism manifests in safeguarding victims. The author critically reviews twenty-first century pluralised multi-agency approaches to tackling crime, preventing harm, ‘responsibilising’ perpetrators and supporting victims, drawing on a case study example: Tackling serial perpetrators of domestic abuse through Multi-Agency Tasking and Co-ordination (MATAC) and the subsequent Domestic Abuse Whole Systems Approach (DAWSA), both pioneered in the North East of England, the United Kingdom, to reflect on developments in community safety. New partnerships such as these appear less wedded to the traditional criminal justice paradigm that has so far failed so many victims of domestic abuse and more committed to a holistic approach. The spur to recent developments in the policing of domestic abuse is seemingly a complex mix of political—including diverse feminist-influenced—drivers pushing for change. A key message from this chapter is that healthy scepticism from partners means that collaboration is hard work, but can be effective in preventing victimisation and supporting victims. Stakeholders from charities and statutory bodies alike are finding ways of working, such that they are ‘critical allies’ in the drive for change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barton, H., & Valero-Silva, N. (2012). Policing in Partnership. Public Sector Management, 26(7), 543–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, C. (2015). Protecting Victims of Domestic Violence – Have We Got the Balance Right? The Journal of Criminal Law, 79(2), 102–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape. London: Secker and Warburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buser, M. (2013). Tracing the Democratic Narrative: Big Society, Localism and Civic Engagement. Local Government Studies, 39(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cismaru, M., & Lavack, A. M. (2011). Campaigns Targeting Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 12(4), 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, J., Donovan, C., & Marchant, J. (2016). Distancing and Limited Resourcefulness: Third Sector Service Provision Under Austerity Localism in the North East of England. Urban Studies, 53(4), 723–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, A. (2007). Crime Prevention and Community Safety. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (2008). Looking Out a Broken Old Window: Community Safety, Gendered Crimes and Victimisations. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal, 10(4), 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (2011). Post-Emotional Man and a Community Safety with Feeling. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal, 13(1), 34–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (2018). Tackling Domestic Abuse Locally: Paradigms, Ideologies and the Political Tensions of Multi-agency Working. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 2(3), 429–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P., & Biddle, P. (2017). Implementing a Perpetrator Focused Partnership Approach to Tackling Domestic Abuse: The Opportunities and Challenges of Criminal Justice Localism. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(4), 468–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DAWSA. Retrieved from http://www.dawsa.org.uk/about/.

  • Devaney, J. (2014). Male Perpetrators of Domestic Abuse: How Should We Hold Them to Account? The Political Quarterly, 85(4), 480–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence Against Wives: A Case Against the Patriarchy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R., & Dobash, R. (1998). Rethinking Violence Against Women. SAGE Series on Violence Against Women; Vol. 9. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., Dobash, R. P., Cavanagh, K., & Lewis, R. (2000). Changing Violent Men. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, C., & Barnes, R. (2017). Domestic Violence and Abuse in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and/or Transgender (LGB and/or T) Relationships. Sexualities. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460716681491.

  • Donovan, C., & Hester, M. (2014). Domestic Violence and Sexuality. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. (2017). Legal Systems Abuse and Coercive Control. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(1), 84–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, B., & Fraser, C. (2012). Working with Fathers around Domestic Violence. Child Abuse Review, 21, 255–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, D., Ince, A., Mackinnon, D., Strauss, K., & Cumbers, L. (2012). Progressive Localism and the Construction of Political Alternatives. Transactions, 37(2), 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, T., Myers, R. R., & Robison, K. J. (2014). Potential Partnerships: Progressive Criminology, Grassroots Organizations and Social Justice. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 4(4), 76–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E. W. (2002). Batterer Intervention Systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanmer, J., & Maynard, M. (1987). Women, Violence and Social Control. Explorations in Sociology. British Sociological Association Conference Volume Series. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanmer, J., & Saunders, S. (1984). Well-founded Fear: A Community Study of Violence to Women. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, K. (2007). Situational Crime Prevention and Its Discontents: Rational Choice Theory Versus the ‘Culture of Now’. Social Policy & Administration, 41(3), 232–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidensohn, F., & Gelsthorpe, L. (2007). Gender and Crime. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMIC. (2014). Everyone’s Business. Improving the Response to Domestic Abuse. London: HMIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMIC. (2015). Increasingly Everyone’s Business. A Progress Report on Improving the Response to Domestic Abuse. London: HMIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (1990). The Victims Charter: A Statement of Rights for Victims of Crime. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2016). Ending Violence Against Women and Girls Strategy, 2016–2020. London: HM Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L., & Shearing, C. (2003). Governing Security: Explorations in Policing and Justice. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving Sexual Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L., & Radford, J. (1987). The Problem of Men: Feminist Perspectives on Sexual Violence. In P. Scraton (Ed.), Law, Order and the Authoritarian State. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L., & Westmarland, N. (2015). Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programmes: Steps Towards Change. Project Mirabal Final Report. London: London Metropolitan University and Durham University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawby, R. I., & Walklate, S. L. (1994). Critical Victimology. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2015). Code of Practice for Victims of Crime. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office. (2002). Helping Victims and Witnesses: The Work of Victim Support. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, House of Commons Session1212, 2001–2002: 23rd October 2002, London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics. (2018a). Domestic Abuse: Findings from the Crime Survey for England and Wales: Year Ending March 2017. Published Online: ONS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics. (2018b). Homicide in England and Wales: Year Ending March 2017. Published Online: ONS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopalan, V., Price, P., & Donaghy, P. (2008). An Evaluation of the East London DVIP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivett, M. (2010). Working with Violent Male Carers (Fathers and Step Fathers). In B. Featherstone et al. (Eds.), Gender and Child Welfare in Society. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebba, L. (2001). On the Relationship Between Criminological Research and Policy: The Case of Crime Victims. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 1(1), 27–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., & Wincup, E. (2000). Breaking in: Researching Criminal Justice Institutions for Women. In R. King & E. Wincup (Eds.), Doing Research on Crime and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanko, E. A. (1988). Hidden Violence Against Women. In M. Maguire & J. Pointing (Eds.), Victims of Crime: A New Deal? Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanko, E. (1990). Everyday Violence: How Women and Men Experience Sexual and Physical Danger. London: Pandora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vacchelli, E. (2015). Project Muse. Localism and Austerity: A Gender Perspective. Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ginneken, E. (2017). Community Safety and Crime Prevention. In P. Davies, J. Harding, & G. Mair (Eds.), An Introduction to Criminal Justice (pp. 189–207). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S., & Towers, J. (2018). Untangling the Concepts of Coercive Control: Theorizing Domestic Violet Crime. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(1), 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, S. L. (2007). Men, Victims and Crime. In P. Davies, P. Francis, & C. Greer (Eds.), Victims, Crime and Society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, S. (2018). Reflections on Community Safety: The Ongoing Precarity of Women’s Lives. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 20(4), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-018-0050-y.

  • Walklate, S. L., & Evans, K. (1999). Zero Tolerance or Community Tolerance? Managing Crime in High Crime Areas. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, S. L., Fitz-Gibbon, K., & McCulloch, J. (2017). Is More Law the Answer? Seeking Justice for Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Through the Reform of Legal Categories. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895817728561.

  • Westmarland, N. (2012). Co-ordinating Responses to Domestic Violence. In J. M. Brown & S. L. Walklate (Eds.), Handbook on Sexual Violence (pp. 287–307). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westwood, A. (2011). Localism, Social Capital and the ‘Big Society’. Local Economy, 26(8), 690–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. (1983). What Is to Be Done About Violence Against Women? Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken Windows: Police and Neighbourhood Safety. Atlantic Monthly, 249, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Pamela Davies

Authors
  1. Pamela Davies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela Davies .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Hampshire, UK

    Jacki Tapley

  2. Department of Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Pamela Davies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Davies, P. (2020). Partnerships and Activism: Community Safety, Multi-agency Partnerships and Safeguarding Victims. In: Tapley, J., Davies, P. (eds) Victimology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42288-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42288-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42287-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42288-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation