Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Science in Out-of-School Contexts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Values in Science Education

Abstract

This chapter addresses the importance of understanding certainty and uncertainty in relation to scientific evidence, risk in decision-making, and trust in science and scientists. Following a museum-based story about certainty and scientific evidence, two significant international events are described to demonstrate the consequences of failing to understand uncertainty in science. Research into people’s perceptions about the nature of scientific knowledge is revisited to reveal that adults may think less scientifically after a science-related experience, and examine how values and beliefs relating to the certainty/uncertainty of scientific knowledge are inherent in how science is communicated in public places like museums. It is argued that if people are to be encouraged to think more scientifically about the nature of science and its processes, a greater effort is needed to present science in ways that may be interpreted as controversial, and also communicate uncertainty in scientific evidence. The chapter concludes by exploring how a balanced exhibition might be achieved in this difficult process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achiam, M., & Sølberg, J. (2017). Nine meta-functions for science museums and science centres. Museum Management and Curatorship, 32(2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2016.1266282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldhous, P. (2000). Inquiry blames missed warnings for scale of Britain’s BSE crisis. Nature, 408, 3–5. Retrieved from www.nature.com

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D. (1999). Values in science: An educational experience. Science & Education, 8, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Alliance of Museums. (n.d.). Museum facts. Retrieved from http://www.aam-us.org/about-museums/museum-facts

  • Bryant, C. (2013). Science communication: The consequences of being human. In J. K. Gilbert & S. Stocklmayer (Eds.), Communication and engagement with science and technology: Issues and dilemmas (pp. 273–289). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartlidge, E. (2015a, February 10). Why Italian earthquake scientists were exonerated. Science News. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa7841. Retrieved from http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/02/why-italian-earthquake-scientists-were-exonerated

  • Cartlidge, E. (2015b, November 20). Italy’s Supreme Court clears L’Aquila earthquake scientists for good. Science News. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa7841. Retrieved from http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/11/italy-s-supreme-court-clears-l-aquila-earthquake-scientists-good

  • Coenraads, R. R. (1995). Gemstones of New South Wales. The Australian Gemmologist, 19(3), 19–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J., & Hobson, M. (2013). Communicating global climate change: Issues and dilemmas. In J. K. Gilbert & S. Stocklmayer (Eds.), Communication and engagement with science and technology: Issues and dilemmas (pp. 215–228). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhaime-Ross, A. (2014, November 11). Manslaughter conviction overturned for Italian geologists, but other scientists are still fearful. The Verge. Retrieved from https://www.theverge.com/2014/11/11/7193391/italy-judges-clear-geologists-manslaughter-laquila-earthquake-fear

  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. J. (2015). Connoisseurs of science: A next goal for science education? In D. Corrigan, C. Buntting, J. Dillon, A. Jones, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The future in learning science: What’s in it for the learner? (pp. 35–59). London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., & Davis, A. L. (2014). Communicating scientific uncertainty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(Suppl 4), 13664–13671. Retrieved from www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1317504111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, R. F., & Rennie, L. J. (2017). Australian cassiterite and chrysoberyl: Gem and mineral specimens from the Natural History Museum, London. The Australian Gemmologist, 26(7&8), 120–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (1997). Civilization and madness: The great BSE scare of 1996. Public Understanding of Science, 6, 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirch, S. A. (2012). Understanding scientific uncertainty as a teaching and learning goal. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second handbook of research in science education (pp. 851–864). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koster, E. H. (1999). In search of relevance: Science centers as innovators in the evolution of museums. Daedalus, 128(3), 277–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, D., Jenkins, E., Macgill, S., & Davey, A. (1993). Inarticulate science? Perspectives on the public understanding of science and some implications for science education. Nafferton, UK: Studies in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C. (1997). Greenhouse and the science of uncertainty. The Australian Broadcasting Commission. Retrieved from www.abc.net.au/science/earth/climate/uncertain.htm

  • Norris, S. P. (1995). Learning to live with scientific expertise: Toward a theory of intellectual communalism for guiding science teaching. Science Education, 79(2), 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novick, L. (2017). Megalodon: Illustrating scientific uncertainty in an exhibit about sharks. Understanding evolution, The University of California Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley. Retrieved from http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/print/printable_template.php?article_id=evotrees_zoos_08&context=0_0_0

  • Orthia, L. A. (2013). Negotiating public resistance to engagement in science and technology. In J. K. Gilbert & S. Stocklmayer (Eds.), Communication and engagement with science and technology: Issues and dilemmas (pp. 74–90). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. (2004). Handling uncertainty in scientific advice (Postnote Number 220). London: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedretti, E. (2002). T. Kuhn meets T. Rex: Critical conversations and new directions in science centers and science museums. Studies in Science Education, 37, 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedretti, E. (2004). Perspectives on learning through critical issued-based science centre exhibits. Science Education, 88(Suppl. 1), S34–S47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedretti, E., & Navas-Iannini, A. M. (2018). Pregnant pauses: Science museums, schools and a controversial exhibition. In D. Corrigan, C. Buntting, & A. Jones (Eds.), Navigating the changing landscape of formal and informal science learning opportunities (pp. 43–61). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (2013). Beliefs and the value of evidence. In J. K. Gilbert & S. Stocklmayer (Eds.), Communication and engagement with science and technology: Issues and dilemmas (pp. 148–161). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (2017). Teaching the theory of evolution in informal settings to those who are uncomfortable with it. In P. G. Patrick (Ed.), Preparing informal science educators: Perspectives from science communication and education (pp. 495–507). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J. (2007). Values in science portrayed in out-of-school contexts. In D. Corrigan, R. Gunstone, & J. Dillon (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 197–212). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J. (2013). The practice of science and technology communications in science museums. In J. K. Gilbert & S. Stocklmayer (Eds.), Communication and engagement with science and technology: Issues and dilemmas (pp. 197–211). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J., & Williams, G. F. (2000). The nature and measurement of learning from a lecture series in human genetics. In P. J. Fensham & R. Cross (Eds.), Social responsibility of science and citizenship: Implications for education (pp. 17–34). Melbourne: Melbourne Studies in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J., & Williams, G. F. (2002). Science centres and scientific literacy: Promoting a relationship with science. Science Education, 86, 706–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J., & Williams, G. F. (2006a). Communication about science in a traditional museum: Visitors’ and staff’s perceptions. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 791–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-006-9035-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J., & Williams, G. F. (2006b). Adults’ learning about science in free-choice settings. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 871–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovelli, C. (2012). Science is not about certainty: A philosophy of physics. Retrieved from https://www.edge.org/conversation/carlo_rovelliscienceisnotaboutcertaintyaphilosophyofphysics

  • Schneider-Bateman, G. J. (2012, June). Uncertainty in the science museum: Contributions to a rhetorical education. Paper presented at the Canadian Society for the Study of Rhetoric, Waterloo, Ontario. Retrieved from http://www.gregoryjschneider.net/uncertaintyinthesciencemuseumcontributionstoarhetoricaleducation/

  • Shen, B. J. (1975). Scientific literacy and the public understanding of science. In S. Day (Ed.), Communication of scientific information (pp. 44–52). Basel, Switzerland: Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. F. H. (1913). Gem-stones and their distinctive characteristics (2nd ed.). London: Methuen &.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Science Education, 83, 493–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stocklmayer, S. (2013). Engagement with science: Models of science communication. In J. K. Gilbert & S. Stocklmayer (Eds.), Communication and engagement with science and technology: Issues and dilemmas (pp. 19–38). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocklmayer, S. M., & Rennie, L. J. (2017). The attributes of informal science education: A science communication perspective. In P. G. Patrick (Ed.), Preparing informal science educators: Perspectives from science communication and education (pp. 527–544). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stocklmayer, S. M., Rennie, L. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (2010). The roles of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education. Studies in Science Education, 46, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo, C. (2013). Communicating the significance or risk. In J. K. Gilbert & S. Stocklmayer (Eds.), Communication and engagement with science and technology: Issues and dilemmas (pp. 93–109). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Union of Concerned Scientists. (n.d.). Global warming, science and impacts. Retrieved from (http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/science/certainty-vs-uncertainty.html#.WSOQhet9670

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

    Léonie J. Rennie

Authors
  1. Léonie J. Rennie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Léonie J. Rennie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia

    Deborah Corrigan

  2. University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Cathy Buntting

  3. Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia

    Angela Fitzgerald

  4. University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Alister Jones

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rennie, L.J. (2020). Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Science in Out-of-School Contexts. In: Corrigan, D., Buntting, C., Fitzgerald, A., Jones, A. (eds) Values in Science Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42172-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42172-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42171-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42172-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation