Abstract
The Amazon is the largest forest system on Earth, supporting a variety of indigenous societies, small farmers, extractivists, and artisanal fishers with different cultures and relations with wildlife. However, the Brazilian Amazon has lost more than 436,000 km2 of forest in the last 30 years, and Protected Areas may not be enough to ensure the conservation of biodiversity and cultural heritage. On the other hand, formal alliances with rural inhabitants can decentralize resource management, strengthen full-time surveillance systems, reduce overall costs, and boost conservation effectiveness. Here, we provide an assessment of the two largest community-based management (CBM) programs in the Brazilian Amazon, which are inducing strong social and ecological benefits at a large scale. First, we show the benefits from CBM of giant arapaima, which has promoted an impressive stock recovery of the world’s largest freshwater scaled fish (Arapaima spp.), generating income and other benefits for rural livelihoods in Amazonian floodplains. Second, we show that CBM of freshwater turtles (Podocnemis spp.) has also promoted the population recovery of overexploited turtles, contributing to the maintenance of important cultural values. We also identified a set of social and institutional principles, and the intrinsic values of natural resources, which can help develop successful CBM programs. Finally, we discuss how these principles can strengthen existing initiatives and/or inspire new ones. Reconciling biodiversity conservation and local aspirations for rural development is an urgent socioecological demand in Amazonia. Raising the profile of successful initiatives can be a powerful strategy to disseminate a message of hope and action to local and international agencies that can support the scaling up of these successful models.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albuquerque UP, de Medeiros PM, Ferreira Júnior WS et al (2019) Social-ecological theory of maximization: basic concepts and two initial models. Biol Theory. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-019-00316-8
Alho CJR (1985) Conservation and management strategies for commonly exploited amazonian turtles. Biol Conserv 32(4):291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(85)90019-9
Alves-Pinto HN, Hawes JE, Newton P et al. (2018) Economic impacts of payments for environmental services on livelihoods of agroextractivist communities in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecol Econ. 152:378–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.016
Andrade PCM (2007) Criação e Manejo de Quelônios no Amazonas – Projeto Diagnóstico da Criação Animais Silvestres no Estado do Amazonas, 2nd edn. ProVárzea/FAPEAM/SDS, Manaus
Antunes AP, Fewster R, Venticinque EM et al (2016) Empty forest or empty rivers? A century of commercial hunting in Amazonia. Sci Adv 2(10):e1600936. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600936
Arantes ML, Freitas CEC (2016) Effects of fisheries zoning and environmental characteristics on population parameters of the tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) in managed floodplain lakes in the Central Amazon. Fish Manag Ecol 23(2):133–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12164
Arias L, Barbieri C, Barreto G et al (2018) High-resolution mitochondrial DNA analysis sheds light on human diversity, cultural interactions, and population mobility in Northwestern Amazonia. Am J Phys Anthropol 165(2): 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23345
Baggio JA, Barnett AJ, Perez-Ibara I et al (2016) Explaining success and failure in the commons: the configural nature of Ostrom’s institutional design principles. Int J Commons 10:417–439. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.634
Berkes F (2007) Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(39):15188–15193. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702098104
Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 10:1251–1262. https://doi.org/10.2307/2641280
Brauner CJ (2004) Transition in organ function during the evolution of air-breathing; insights from Arapaima gigas, an obligate air-breathing teleost from the Amazon. J Exp Biol 207:1433–1438. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00887
Bruner AG, Gullison RE, Rice RE, Da Fonseca GAB (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291(5591):125–128. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5501.125
Bruner AG, Gullison RE, Balmford A (2004) Financial costs and shortfalls of managing and expanding protected-area systems in developing countries. Bioscience 54(12):1119–1126. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[1119:FCASOM]2.0.CO;2
Campos-Silva JV, Peres CA (2016) Community-based management induces rapid recovery of a high-value tropical freshwater fishery. Sci Rep 6:34745. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34745
Campos-Silva JV, da Fonseca Junior SF, da Silva Peres CA (2015) Policy reversals do not bode well for conservation in Brazilian Amazonia. Nat e Conserv 13:193–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncon.2015.11.006
Campos-Silva JV, Peres CA, Antunes AP et al (2017) Community-based population recovery of overexploited Amazonian wildlife. Perspect Ecol Conserv 15:266–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2017.08.004
Campos-Silva JV, Hawes JE, Andrade PCM, Peres CA (2018) Unintended multispecies co-benefits of an Amazonian community-based conservation programme. Nat Sustain 1:650–656. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0170-5
Campos-Silva JV, Hawes JE, Peres CA (2019) Population recovery, seasonal site fidelity and daily activity of pirarucu (Arapaima spp.) in an Amazonian floodplain mosaic. Freshw Biol 64:1255–1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13301
Cantarelli VH, Malvasio A, Verdade LM (2014) Brazil’s Podocnemis expansa conservation program: retrospective and future directions. Chelonian Conserv Biol 13:124–128. https://doi.org/10.2744/ccb-0926.1
Castello L (2004) A method to count pirarucu Arapaima gigas: fishers, assessment, and management. N Am J Fish Manag 24(2):379–389. https://doi.org/10.1577/M02-024.1
Castello L, Stewart DJ (2010) Assessing CITES non-detriment findings procedures for Arapaima in Brazil. J Appl Ichthyol 26:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2009.01355.x
Castello L, Viana JP, Watkins G et al (2009) Lessons from integrating fishers of Arapaima in small-scale fisheries Management at the Mamirauá Reserve, Amazon. Environ Manag 43:197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9220-5
Castello L, Viana JP, Pinedo-Vasquez M (2011) Participatory conservation and local knowledge in the Amazon várzea: the pirarucu management scheme in Mamirauá. In: Pinedo-Vasquez M, Ruffino ML, Padoch C, Brondízio ES (eds) The Amazon Várzea. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 259–273
Castello L, Arantes CC, Mcgrath DG et al (2015) Understanding fishing-induced extinctions in the Amazon. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 25(5):587–598. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2491
Cavole LM, Arantes CC, Castello L (2015) How illegal are tropical small-scale fisheries? An estimate for arapaima in the Amazon. Fish Res 168:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2015.03.012
Cinner JE, Daw TM, McClanahan TR et al (2012a) Transitions toward co-management: the process of marine resource management devolution in three east African countries. Glob Environ Chang 22:651–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.03.002
Cinner JE, McClanahan TR, MacNeil MA et al (2012b) Comanagement of coral reef social-ecological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:5219–5222. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1121215109
Coetzee BWT, Gaston KJ, Chown SL (2014) Local scale comparisons of biodiversity as a test for global protected area ecological performance: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 9:e105824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105824
Costello C, Gaines SD, Lynham J (2008) Can catch shares prevent fisheries collapse? Science 321(5896):1678–1681. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1159478
Cox M, Arnold G, Tomás SV (2010) A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecol Soc 15:38. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03704-150438
Cox M, Villamayor-Tomas S, Arnold G (2016) Design principles in commons science: a response to “Ostrom, Hardin and the commons” (Araral). Environ Sci Pol 61:238–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.020
Cristancho S, Vining J (2004) Culturally defined keystone species. Res Hum Ecol 11(2):153-164
Cvitanovic C, Hobday AJ (2018) Building optimism at the environmental science-policy-practice interface through the study of bright spots. Nat Commun 9:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05977-w
de Almeida MB (2002) The politics of Amazonian conservation: the struggles of rubber tappers. J Lat Am Anthropol 7:170–219. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlca.2002.7.1.170
Constantino PAL, Carlos HSA, Ramalho EE et al (2012) Empowering local people through community-based resource monitoring: a comparison of Brazil and Namibia. Ecol Soc 17:22. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05164-170422
Fearnside PM (1989) Extractive reserves in Amazonia Brazilian: an opportunity to maintain tropical rain forest under sustainable use. Bioscience 39(6):387–393. https://doi.org/10.2307/1311068
Freitas CT, Lopes PFM, Campos-Silva JV, Noble MM, Dyball R, Peres CA (2020) Co-management of culturally important species: A tool to promote biodiversity conservation and human well-being. People Nat 2:61–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10064
Garibaldi A, Turner N (2004) Cultural keystone species: implications for ecological conservation and restoration. Ecol Soc 9:1. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00669-090301
Gibson CC, Marks SA (1995) Transforming rural hunters into conservationists: an assessment of community-based wildlife management programs in Africa. World Dev 23:941–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00025-8
Gutiérrez NL, Hilborn R, Defeo O (2011) Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 470:386–389. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09689
Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R et al (2013) High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342(6160):850–853. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693
Hawes JE, Peres CA, Riley LB, Hess LL (2012) Landscape-scale variation in structure and biomass of Amazonian seasonally flooded and unflooded forests. For Ecol Manag 281:163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.023
INPE (2019) Monitoramento da Floresta Amazônica Brasileira por satélite – Projeto Prodes. http://terrabrasilis.dpi.inpe.br/app/dashboard/deforestation/biomes/legal_amazon/rates. Accessed 16 Apr 2019
Jepson PR, Caldecott B, Schmitt SF et al (2017) Protected area asset stewardship. Biol Conserv 212:183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.03.032
Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE (1989) The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain-systems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 106:110–127
Levi T, Shepard GH, Ohl-Schacherer J et al (2009) Modelling the long-term sustainability of indigenous hunting in Manu National Park, Peru: landscape-scale management implications for Amazonia. J Appl Ecol 46:804–814. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01661.x
Lima D, Pozzobon J (2005) Amazônia socioambiental: sustentabilidade ecológica e diversidade social. Estud Avançados 19:45–76. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-40142005000200004
Lockwood M, Davidson J, Stratford E, Griffith R (2010) Governance principles for natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour An Int J 23:986–1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802178214
Magnusson WE, Grelle CEV, Marques MCM et al (2018) Effects of Brazil’s political crisis on the science needed for biodiversity conservation. Front Ecol Evol 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00163
Miorando PS, Rebêlo GH, Pignati MT, Brito Pezzuti JC (2013) Effects of community-based management on Amazon River turtles: a case study of Podocnemis sextuberculata in the lower Amazon floodplain, Pará, Brazil. Chelonian Conserv Biol 12:143–150. https://doi.org/10.2744/ccb-1011.1
Muehlig-hofmann A (2007) Traditional authority and community leadership: key factors in community-based marine resource management and conservation. SPC Tradit Mar Resour Manag Knowl Inf Bull 21:31–44
Nelson JS (1994) Fishes of the world. Wiley, New York. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119174844
Newton P, Watkinson AR, Peres CA (2011) Determinants of yield in a non-timber forest product: Copaifera oleoresin in Amazonian extractive reserves. For Ecol Manag 261:255–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.10.014
Novaro AJ, Redford KH, Bodmer RE (2000) Effect of hunting in source-sink systems in the neotropics. Conserv Biol 14:713–721. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98452.x
Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Olsson P, Folke C, Hahn T (2004) Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecol Soc 9. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00683-090402
Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325(5939):419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
Peres CA (2011) Conservation in sustainable-use tropical forest reserves. Conserv Biol 25:1124–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01770.x
Petersen TA, Brum SM, Rossoni F et al (2016) Recovery of Arapaima sp. populations by community-based management in floodplains of the Purus River, Amazon. J Fish Biol 89:241–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12968
Pezzuti JCB, Lima JP, da Silva DF, Begossi A (2010) Uses and taboos of turtles and tortoises along Rio Negro, Amazon Basin. J Ethnobiol 30:153–168. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-30.1.153
Pinkerton E, Weinstein M (1995) Fisheries that work: sustainability through community-based management. The David Suzuki Foundation, Vancouver
Prestes-Carneiro G, Béarez P, Bailon S et al (2016) Subsistence fishery at Hatahara (750–1230 CE), a pre-Columbian central Amazonian village. J Archaeol Sci Reports 8:454–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.10.033
Pretty J (2003) Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 302(5652): 1912–1914. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1090847
Rebêlo G, Pezzuti J (2000) Percepções sobre o consumo de quelônios na Amazônia: sustentabilidade e alternativas ao manejo atual. Ambient Soc 6:85–104. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-753X2000000100005
Schwartzman S, Alencar A, Zarin H, Souza APS (2010) Social movements and large-scale tropical forest protection on the Amazon frontier: Conservation from chaos. J Environ Dev 19:274–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496510367627
Schneider L, Ferrara CR, Vogt RC, Burger J (2011) History of turtle exploitation and management techniques to conserve turtles in the Rio Negro Basin of the Brazilian Amazon. Chelonian Conserv Biol 10:149–157. https://doi.org/10.2744/ccb-0848.1
Smith NJH (1979) Aquatic turtles of Amazonia: an endangered resource. Biol Conserv 16:165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(79)90019-3
Somanathan E, Prabhakar R, Singh B (2009) Decentralization for cost-effective conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:4143–4147. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45701-1
Sunderlin WD, Angelsen A, Belcher B et al (2005) Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview. World Dev 33:1383–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.004
Terborgh J, Peres CA (2017) Do community-managed forests work? A biodiversity perspective. Land 6:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3390/land6020022
Vadjunec JM, Schmink M, Greiner AL (2011) New Amazonian geographies: emerging identities and landscapes. J Cult Geogr 28:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873631.2011.548477
Watson JEM, Dudley N, Segan DB, Hockings M (2014) The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13947
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Campos-Silva, J.V., Hawes, J.E., Freitas, C.T., Andrade, P.C.M., Peres, C.A. (2020). Community-Based Management of Amazonian Biodiversity Assets. In: Baldauf, C. (eds) Participatory Biodiversity Conservation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41686-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41686-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41685-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41686-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)