Skip to main content

Resilience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disasterland

Abstract

A second framing has emerged in the international world of “natural” disasters, which envisages disaster from a perspective inspired by both psychology and ecology. Here, disaster is considered to be a shock impacting an environment or a system, a “trauma”that must be recovered from. The time frame of the action fits into a cyclical perspective that considers the disaster as a moment in the life of a society, followed by a phase of recovery, then reconstruction, and finally preparation for the next disaster. Even when it is considered sudden and violent, the disaster is also routine because it is recurrent. It regularly affects particular groups and must be seen as an event that will inevitably come about, even if its effects are not always substantial. This is the perspective of “extensive” risks, hazards that have a high probability of occurring, but do not always have a major impact. Disasters are thus envisaged as sudden events that stem from factors that are endogenous to the society itself. As a result, the resources to face them should be found within that society or group, even among individuals. Since the late 1990s, and even more so since the 2000s, a new notion has come to incarnate this central idea: resilience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here I am using the notion of trauma in line with standard usage by actors in the world of “natural” disasters, partially disconnected from its medical origins and appropriated by various actors who use it without needing to demonstrate medical or psychiatric proof of “trauma.” Fassin and Rechtman (2009) and Latté (2008) describe this movement very well in the case of the AZF factory explosion in France in 2001.

  2. 2.

    The notion of vulnerability, which is intimately connected to that of resilience was also the subject of criticism by social science researchers during the 2000s, sometimes based on arguments close to those used in criticisms of resilience.

  3. 3.

    http://www.preventionweb.net/english/ (accessed April 19, 2018).

  4. 4.

    A special funding mechanism for disaster prevention actions put in place by the World Bank.

  5. 5.

    Field notes, March 14, 2015.

  6. 6.

    Fassin and Rechtman (2009) present a detailed genealogy of psychiatric assistance programs in the international humanitarian sphere, but also for interventions relating to disasters in the national context, such as the wave of terrorist attacks in France in 1995 and the September 11 attacks in the United States in 2001.

  7. 7.

    Similar situations have been observed in many other cases of disaster. See, for example, the explosion of the AZF factory in Toulouse in 2001 discussed in chapter 6, “Toulouse,” based on the study conducted by Stéphane Latté in Fassin and Rechtman (2009).

  8. 8.

    Field notes, Geneva, Switzerland, May 2009.

  9. 9.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMV7aJhcWjo

  10. 10.

    http://www.sgi.org/content/files/in-focus/2015/150316-FBOs-Statement-WCDRR.pdf (accessed April 19, 2018).

  11. 11.

    Field notes, Sendai, March 16, 2015.

  12. 12.

    ActionAid, Christian Aid, Plan UK, Practical Action, Tearfund, as well as British Red Cross/International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.

  13. 13.

    See the IFRC report, World Disaster Report 2014: https://www.ifrc.org/publications-and-reports/world-disasters-report/world-disasters-report-2014/world-disasters-report-2014%2D%2Dchapter-4/ (accessed April 19, 2018).

  14. 14.

    See, for example, Cordaid: http://www.preventionweb.net/files/11894_11894CordaidTowardsaresilientfuture.pdf (accessed April 19, 2018).

  15. 15.

    Field notes, Désastres: Savoir, Anthropologies, Éthique, Conference at UNESCO, Paris, France, July 4, 2011.

  16. 16.

    https://www.jica.go.jp/english/news/field/2015/150406_01.html (accessed November 24, 2019).

  17. 17.

    On this subject, see the PhD thesis by Rina Kojima, Reconstruire après Fukushima: responsabiliser et précariser par le risque, supervised by Valérie November and Paul Jobin at the University Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée (LATTS): https://latts.fr/chercheur/rina-kojima/

  18. 18.

    On the Prevention Web site, a search for “microinsurance,” conducted in April 2017, yielded 1180 results, 489 of which concerned programs implemented in Asia, 370 in Europe, 172 in Africa and 158 in the Americas.

  19. 19.

    http://www.haitilibre.com/article-3440-haiti-economie-micro-assurance-pour-le-micro-credit.html (accessed April 19, 2018).

  20. 20.

    http://www.fonkoze.org/about-fonkoze/ (accessed April 19, 2018).

  21. 21.

    Field notes, Sendai, Japan, March 14, 2015.

References

  • Aldrich, Daniel P. 2012. Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, David. 2013. Resilience and Disaster Risk Reduction: An Etymological Journey. Natural Hazards Earth Systems Sciences 13: 2707–2716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asanuma-Brice, Cécile. 2014. De la gestion des flux migratoires par un État nucléariste dans un contexte de catastrophe nucléaire. Les grands dossiers de diplomatie. Affaires stratégiques et relations internationales, no. 22: 71–75. Accessed May 2018. http://www.lelanet.net/Docu/071-075_Asanuma_VF.pdf.

  • ———. 2015. À Fukushima, la population est dans une situation inextricable. CNRS le journal, no. 280: 36–38. Accessed May 2018. https://lejournal.cnrs.fr/articles/a-fukushima-la-population-est-dans-une-situation-inextricable.

  • Bahadur, Aditya V., et al. 2010. The Resilience Renaissance? Unpacking of Resilience for Tackling Climate Change and Disasters. Strengthening Climate Resilience Discussion Paper 1. Institute of Development Studies, 45p. Accessed May 2018. https://www.fsnnetwork.org/sites/default/files/ids_resilience-renaissance.pdf.

  • Barrios, Roberto E. 2016. Resilience: A commentary from the vantage point of anthropology. Annals of Anthropological Practice 40(1): 28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Governing Affect: Neoliberalism and Disaster Reconstruction. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayart, Jean-François, et al. 1992. Le politique par le bas en Afrique noire: contributions à une problématique de la démocratie. Paris: Karthala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benadusi, Mara. 2015. Cultivating Communities after Sisaster: A Whirlwind of Generosity on the Coasts of Sri Lanka. In Governing Disasters. Beyond Risk Culture, ed. Sandrine Revet and Julien Langumier. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourcart, Léo. 2015. Émergence et usages du concept de résilience dans les mondes académiques et institutionnels. PhD thesis in political science, University Grenoble-Alpes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, Patrick J., et al. 1995. Psychological Responses to War and Atrocity: The Limitations of Current Concepts. Social Science & Medicine 40 (8): 1073–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Nick. 2003. Vulnerability, Risk and Adaptation: A Conceptual Framework. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, Terry. 2008. Reducing People’s Vulnerability to Natural Hazards. Communities and Resilience. Research Paper No. 2008/34. United Nations University, UNU-WIDER. Accessed May 2018. https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/rp2008-34.pdf.

  • Chauveau, Jean-Pierre. 1992. Le ‘modèle participatif’ de développement rural est-il ‘alternatif’? Éléments pour une anthropologie de la culture des ‘développeurs’. Bulletin de l’APAD, no. 3. Accessed August 2014. http://apad.revues.org/380.

  • Comfort, Louise K., Arjen Boin, and Chris C. Demchak, eds. 2010. Designing Resilience: Preparing for Extreme Events. University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, Susan L., Kevin D. Ash, and Christopher T. Emrich. 2014. The Geographies of Community Disaster Resilience. Global Environmental Change 29: 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyrulnik, Boris. 1999. Un merveilleux malheur. Paris: Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, Mark. 2007. Development, Security and Unending War. Governing the World of Peoples. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. How Did We Become Unprepared? Emergency and Resilience in an Uncertain World. Roundtable, British Academy, 7 November 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faas, A. J. 2016. Disaster vulnerability in anthropological perspective. Annals of Anthropological Practice 40 (1): 14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, Didier, and Richard Rechtman. 2009. The Empire of Trauma: An Inquiry into the Condition of Victimhood. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felli, Romain. 2016. La grande adaptation. Climat, capitalisme et catastrophe. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard, Jean-Christophe. 2010. Vulnerability, Capacity and Resilience: Perspectives from Climate and Development Policy. Journal of International Development 22 (2): 218–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garschagen, Matthias. 2013. Resilience and Organisational Institutionalism from a Cross-cultural Perspective: An Exploration Based on Urban Climate Change Adaptation in Vietnam. Natural Hazards, no. 67: 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guijt, Irene, and Meera Kaul Shah. 1998. The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haimes, Yacov Y. 2011. Responses to Terje Aven’s Paper: On Some Recent Definitions and Analysis Frameworks for Risk, Vulnerability and Resilience. Risk Analysis 31 (4): 689–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, Crawford S. 1973. Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFRC. 2010. Psychosocial Interventions. A Handbook. Denmark: Reference Centre for Psychosocial Support of the International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. 2007. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Geneva: IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change).

    Google Scholar 

  • Langumier, Julien. 2015. A Critical Look at the ‘Risk Culture’: France’s ‘Plan Rhône’. In Governing Disasters, ed. Sandrine Revet and Julien Langumier, 127–159. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Latté, Stéphane. 2008. Les “victimes”: la formation d’une catégorie sociale improbable et ses usages dans l’action collective. PhD thesis, EHESS, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, James, and Ilan Kelman. 2010. Places, People and Perpetuity: Community Capacities in Ecologies of Catastrophe. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 9 (2): 191–220. Accessed April 2018. http://ojs.unbc.ca/index.php/acme/article/view/866.

  • Manyena, Siambabala Bernard. 2006. The Concept of Resilience Revisited. Disasters 30 (4): 434–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nay, Olivier. 2010. Les politiques de développement. In Politiques publiques t. 2, Changer la société, ed. Olivier Borraz et al., 139–170. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • November, Andràs, and Valérie November. 2004. Risque, assurance et irréversibilité. Revue européenne des sciences sociales, XLII–130. Accessed April 2017. http://ress.revues.org/475.

  • Olivier de Sardan, Jean-Pierre. 1990. Sociétés et Développement. In Sociétés, Développement et Santé, ed. Didier Fassin and Yannick Jaffré, 28–37. Paris: Éditions Ellipses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pupavac, Vanessa. 2002. Pathologizing Populations and Colonizing Minds: International Psychosocial Programs in Kosovo. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 27 (4): 489–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quenault, Béatrice. 2013. Du double affrontement ontologique/axiologique autour de la résilience aux risques de catastrophe: les spécificités de l’approche française. VertigO – la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement 13 (3). Accessed April 2018. https://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/14510.

  • ———. 2015. De Hyōgo à Sendai, la résilience comme impératif d’adaptation aux risques de catastrophe: nouvelle valeur universelle ou gouvernement par la catastrophe? Développement durable et territoires 6 (3). Accessed April 2018. https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/11010.

  • Reghezza-Zitt, Magali, and Samuel Rufat, eds. 2015. Résiliences. Sociétés et territoires face à l’incertitude, aux risques et aux catastrophes. London: ISTE Éditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revet, Sandrine. 2007. Anthropologie d’une catastrophe. Les coulées de boue de 1999 au Venezuela. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerfield, Derek. 1999. A Critique of Seven Assumptions behind Psychological Trauma Programmes in War-Affected Areas. Social Science & Medicine 48 (10): 1449–1462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Sphere Project. 2011. The Sphere Handbook: Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisseron, Serge. 2011. La résilience. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisseron, Serge, and Boris Cyrulnik. 2007. Controverse: la résilience en question. In Résiliences. Réparation élaboration ou création? ed. Joyce Aïn, 15–53. Toulouse: Éditions Érès.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twigg, John. 2009. Characteristics of a Disaster-Resilient Community. A Guidance Note. Accessed May 2018. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1346086/1/1346086.pdf.

  • UNISDR. 2009. Terminologie pour la prévention des risques de catastrophe. Geneva: United Nations. Accessed April 2018. http://www.unisdr.org/files/7817_UNISDRTerminologyFrench.pdf.

  • Walker, Jeremy, and Melinda Cooper. 2011. Genealogies of Resilience: From Systems Ecology to the Political Economy of Crisis Adaptation. Security Dialogue 42 (2): 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weichselgartner, Juergen. 2001. Disaster Mitigation: The Concept of Vulnerability Revisited. Disaster Prevention and Management 10 (2): 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Sarah C. 1996. Depoliticising Development: The Uses and Abuses of Participation. Development in Practice 6 (1): 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Hongjian, et al. (2008) 2010. Resilience to Natural Hazards: A Geographic Perspective. Natural Hazards, no. 53: 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandrine Revet .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Revet, S. (2020). Resilience. In: Disasterland. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41582-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics