Advertisement

Analysis of the Existence of Geospatial Data Necessary for Fire Modeling in the Republic of Serbia

  • Marko MarkovićEmail author
  • Mirjana Laban
  • Jovana Maksimović
  • Tatjana Kuzmić
  • Mehmed Batilović
  • Suzana Draganić
Conference paper
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Wildfires have always been a threat to civil security. In some cases, they cannot be prevented. However, if fire modeling was performed in advance using the available software, it can significantly increase the level of safety in the event of their occurrence. In this paper an analysis of the existence of the geospatial data necessary for fire modeling for the selected area in the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina, Republic of Serbia, was performed. In addition to this analysis, it is recorded type of databases, in sense of coverage and data limitations, as well as date range of required data. A software that is used for this purpose, FARSITE, is described: the operating principle and the data necessary for fire modelling fire in it. Based on the research conducted in the paper, it can be concluded at which level the original geospatial data necessary for fire modeling are in the Republic of Serbia and what is necessary to do in order to improve that situation.

Keywords

Deliblato sands Geospatial data Fire modeling Safety 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding provided by the Faculty of Technical Sciences, Department of Civil Engineering and Geodesy under project “Theoretical and experimental research in civil engineering for the purpose of improvement of educational process and strengthening of scientific-research capacity of the department”. In addition, this research has partially been supported also by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Projects numbers TR37018 and III43008).

References

  1. 1.
    Banković S, Medarević M, Pantić D, Petrović N, Šljukić B, Obradović S (2009) Šumski fond Republike Srbije - stanje i problemi. Glas Šumar Fak 100:7–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Serbia 2019 Report (2019) Directorate-General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations (European Commission) European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, Commission Staff Working Document 52019SC0219Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zakon o smanjenu rizika od katastrofa i upravljanju vanrednim situacijama (2018) Službeni glasnik Republike SrbijeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Finney MA (1998) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator-model development and evaluation. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ft. Collins, CO, General Technical report RMRS-RP-4Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    FARSITE | Fire, Fuel, and Smoke Science Program. https://www.firelab.org/project/farsite. Accessed 22 Nov 2019
  6. 6.
    Fire Prediction Services: Phoenix RapidFire. https://firepredictionservices.com.au/. Accessed 22 Nov 2019
  7. 7.
    FireGrowthModel.ca - Home. http://www.firegrowthmodel.ca/index.php. Accessed 22 Nov 2019
  8. 8.
    FlamMap | Fire, Fuel, and Smoke Science Program. https://www.firelab.org/project/flammap. Accessed 22 Nov 2019
  9. 9.
    Osorio LYL, Bohórquez GB, Tapias EF (2019) Simulation in the farsite of a forest fire presented in the eastern hills of the town of San Cristóbal in Bogotá. Presented at the applied computer sciences in engineering, WEA 2019. Communications in computer and information science, vol 1052, pp 653–663Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Forghani A, Cechet B, Radke J, Finney M, Butler B (2007) Applying fire spread simulation over two study sites in California lessons learned and future plans. In: 2007 IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium, Barcelona, Spain, pp 3008–3013Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arca B, Duce P, Laconi M, Pellizzaro G, Salis M, Spano D (2007) Evaluation of FARSITE simulator in mediterranean maquis. Int J Wildland Fire 16(5):563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kanga S, Singh SK (2017) Forest fire simulation modeling using remote sensing & GIS. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci 8(5):326–332Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kanga S, Sharma L, Pandey PC, Nathawat MS (2014) GIS modeling approach for forest fire risk assessment and management. Int J Adv Remote Sens GIS Geogr 2(1):30–44Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scott JH (2007) Nomographs for estimating surface fire behavior characteristics. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ft. Collins, CO, RMRS-GTR-192Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heinsch FA, Andrews PL (2010) BehavePlus fire modeling system, version 5.0: design and features. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ft. Collins, CO, General Technical report RMRS-GTR-249Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stratton RD (2009) Guidebook on LANDFIRE fuels data acquisition, critique, modification, maintenance, and model calibration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical report RMRS-GTR-220Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keane RE, Garner JL, Schmidt KM, Long DG, Menakis JP, Finney MA (1998) Development of input data layers for the FARSITE fire growth model for the Selway-bitterroot wilderness complex, USA. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ft. Collins, CO, General Technical report RMRS-GTR-3Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ducić V, Milovanović B (2004) Termičke specifičnosti Deliblatske (banatske) peščare. Zb Rad Geogr Fak Univ U Beogr 52:1–12Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Živojinović D, Sekulić D (1980) Šumski požari na Deliblatskoj peščari. Deliblatski Pesak Zb Rad IV Spec Prir Rezerv Deliblatski Pesak Šumsko Ind Komb Pančevo Druš Ekol Vojv, pp 83–100Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Milenković M, Munćan S (2004) Ugroženost šuma Deliblatske peščare od požara. Specijalni rezervat prirode Deliblato sands, Zb Rad VII Javno Preduz Vojvodinašume Novi Sad Šumsko Gazdinstvo Banat Pančevo, pp 53–68Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Živojinović D (1975) Šumski požari na Deliblatskom pesku posle II svetskog rata i analiza njihovih pojava. Deliblatski Pesak Zb Rad III Jugosl Poljopr-Šumar Cent Beogr Šumsko Ind Komb Pančevo, pp 165–182Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Milenković M (2011) Fizičko-geografski faktori nastanka i dinamike šumskih požara u Deliblatskoj peščari. Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Geography, University of Belgrade, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen J, Cao X, Peng S, Ren H (2017) Analysis and applications of GlobeLand30: a review. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 6(8):230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tadono T, Ishida H, Oda F, Naito S, Minakawa K, Iwamoto H (2014) Precise global DEM generation by ALOS PRISM. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 4:71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marko Marković
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mirjana Laban
    • 1
  • Jovana Maksimović
    • 1
  • Tatjana Kuzmić
    • 1
  • Mehmed Batilović
    • 1
  • Suzana Draganić
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Technical SciencesUniversity of Novi SadNovi SadRepublic of Serbia

Personalised recommendations