Skip to main content

The Role of the Other: How Interaction Partners Influence Identity Maintenance in Four Cultures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Since its inception, identity theory has emphasized the crucial role of relationships with others in shaping social behavior. Sheldon Stryker’s original formulation of identity theory gave a central role to social networks in determining structural commitment to identities. Research in the identity theory tradition explicitly considers interactional partners as occupants of counter-roles and as sources of reflected appraisals. Implicitly, identity theory research also considers the identities and actions of others as environmental input into the identity verification process. Affect control theory offers a somewhat more elaborated specification of the influence of interaction partners in the identity control process. Others serve both as a source of impression-change in social situations, and as a resource for identity maintenance as the objects of new actions. Recent cross-cultural work in the affect control theory tradition points to important cultural variations in that influence of the other in identity maintenance. In high context cultures like Egypt and Morocco, for example, the identity and actions of one’s interaction partner play an even larger role in shaping one’s identity-situated behavior than in low context cultures like the United States. In this chapter, we present a series of simulations that illustrate the impact of interaction partners on identity maintenance in the United States, China, Egypt, and Morocco.

A version of this chapter was presented at the Indiana University Conference on Identity, in honor of Sheldon Stryker. This manuscript was prepared for Identity and Symbolic Interaction: Deepening Foundations; Building Bridges, edited by Brian Powell, Richard Serpe, and Robin Springer. Forthcoming, 2019. Springer Press. Direct correspondence to the first author at sodawn@uga.edu. We are grateful to the Army Research Office Grants W911NF1510180 and W911NF1710509 for partial support of the activities in this project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bohrnstedt, G. W., Zhang, J., Park, B. J., Ikoma, S., Broer, M., & Ogut, B. (2019). Mathematics identity, self-efficacy, and interest and their relationships to mathematics achievement: A longitudinal analysis. In B. Powell, R. Serpe, & R. Stryker (Eds.), Identity and symbolic interaction: Deepening foundations; building bridges. New York, NY: Springer. (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J. (1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review, 56(6), 836–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cast, A. D., & Cantwell, A. M. (2007). Identity change in newly married couples: Effects of positive and negative feedback. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70(2), 172–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1964/1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellestad, J., & Stets, J. E. (1998). Jealousy and parenting: Predicting emotions from identity theory. Sociological Perspectives, 41(3), 639–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, C., & Heise, D. R. (2006). Mean affective ratings of 1,500 concepts by Indiana University undergraduates in 2002–3, 2006. Distributed at affect control theory website, program Interact. http://research.franklin.uga.edu/act/.

  • Francis, L. E. (1997). Ideology and interpersonal emotion management: Redefining identity in two support groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 153–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeland, R. E., & Hoey, J. (2018). The structure of deference: Modeling occupational status using affect control theory. American Sociological Review, 83(2), 243–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudykunst, W. B., Ting-Toomey, S., & Chua, E. (1988). Culture and interpersonal communication (Vol. 8). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R. (1969). Affectual dynamics in simple sentences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11(3), 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R. (1979). Understanding events: Affect and the construction of social action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R. (2001). Project Magellan: Collecting cross-cultural affective meanings via the internet. Electronic Journal of Sociology. http://www.sociology.org/ejs-archives/vol005.003/mag.html.

  • Heise, D. R. (2007). Expressive order: Confirming sentiments in social actions. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R. (2010). Surveying cultures. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R. (2011). Java INTERACT. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~socpsy/ACT/index.htm. Distributed at http://research.franklin.uga.edu/act/.

  • Heise, D. R. (2014). Cultural variations in sentiments. SpringerPlus, 3, 170. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-170.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R., & Lerner, S. J. (2006). Affect control theory in international interactions. Social Forces, 85(2), 993–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1981). Impressions of goodness, powerfulness, and liveliness from discerned social events. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44(2), 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriegel, D. J., Abdul-Mageed, M., Clark, J. K., Freeland, R. E., Heise, D. R., Robinson, D. T., et al. (2017). A multilevel investigation of Arabic-language impression change. International Journal of Sociology, 47(4), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2017.1372102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, M. H. (1964). The reference group reconsidered. The Sociological Quarterly, 5(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latif, H., Smithlovin, L., Robinson, D. T., Cannon, B. C., Curdy, B., Kriegel, D. J., & Morgan, J. H. (2016). Mean affective ratings of identities, behaviors, and modifiers by residents of Cairo, Egypt in 2012–2014. Distributed at UGA affect control theory website: http://research.franklin.uga.edu/act/.

  • MacKinnon, N. J. (2006). Mean affective ratings of 2,294 concepts by Guelph University undergraduates, Ontario, Canada, in 2001–3. Distributed at http://research.franklin.uga.edu/act/.

  • MacKinnon, N. J., & Robinson, D. T. (2014). Back to the future: 25 Years of research in affect control theory. Advances in Group Processes, 31, 139–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, N. J. (1994). Symbolic interactionism as affect control. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merolla, D. M., Serpe, R. T., Stryker, S., & Schultz, P. W. (2012). Structural precursors to identity processes: The role of proximate social structures. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75(2), 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J. L. (1961). The role concept, a bridge between psychiatry and sociology. American Journal of Psychiatry, 118(6), 518–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. H., Rogers, K. B., & Hu, M. (2016). Distinguishing normative processes from noise: A comparison of four approaches to modeling impressions of social events. Social Psychology Quarterly, 79(4), 311–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, S., & Heise, D. R. (2017). Affective meanings of 1,469 Bengali concepts. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 84. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0704-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E. (1962). Studies on the generality of affective meaning systems. The American Psychologist, 17(1), 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., May, W. H., & Miron, M. S. (1975). Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, T. J., Robinson, D. T., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2010). Three faces of identity. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 477–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitzes, D. C., & Burke, P. J. (1980). College student identity: Measurement and implications. Pacific Sociological Review, 23(1), 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. T. (2007). Control theories in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. T. (2014). The role of cultural meanings and situated interaction in shaping emotion. Emotion Review, 6(3), 189–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. T., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2018). Affect control theories of social interaction and self. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. T., Smith-Lovin, L., Cannon, B. C., Clark, J. K., Freeland, R., Morgan, J. H., & Rogers, K. B. (2016). Mean affective ratings of 929 identities, 814 behaviors, and 660 modifiers by University of Georgia and Duke University undergraduates and by community members in Durham, NC, in 2012–2014. Distributed at UGA affect control theory website. http://research.franklin.uga.edu/act/.

  • Rogers, K. B. (2018). Do you see what I see? Testing for individual differences in impressions of events. Social Psychology Quarterly, 81(2), 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A. (1996). Sexual-erotic emotions in the US in cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 16(9/10), 123–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, T. (2011) A model of language-based impression formation and attribution among Germans. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30(1), 82–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, T. (2013). Mean affective ratings of 1,100 concepts by a diverse sample of Germans in 2007 [computer file]. Distributed at affect control theory website, program Interact. http://research.franklin.uga.edu/act/.

  • Schröder, T., Netzel, J., Schermuly, C. C., & Scholl, W. (2013). Culture-constrained affective consistency of interpersonal behavior. Social Psychology, 44, 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, T., Hoey, J., & Rogers, K. B. (2016). Modeling dynamic identities and uncertainty in social interactions: Bayesian affect control theory. American Sociological Review, 81(4), 828–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. W., & Cai, Y. (2006). Mean affective ratings of 1,146 concepts by Shanghai undergraduates, 1991. Distributed at affect control theory website, program Interact. http://research.franklin.uga.edu/act/.

  • Smith, H. W., Matsuno, T., Ike, S., & Umino, M. (2006). Mean affective ratings of 1,894 concepts by Japanese undergraduates, 1989–2002. Distributed at affect control theory website, program Interact. http://research.franklin.uga.edu/act/.

  • Smith, H. W., Matsuno, T., & Umino, M. (1994). How similar are impression-formation processes among Japanese and Americans? Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 124–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lovin, L. (1987). Impressions from events. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 13(1–2), 35–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lovin, L., & Heise, D. R. (Eds.). (1988). Analyzing social events: Advances in affect control theory. New York: Gordon and Breach Scientific Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lovin, L., & Robinson, D. T. (2006). Control theories of identity, action and emotion: In search of testable differences between affect control theory and identity control theory. In K. McClelland & T. Fararo (Eds.), Purpose, meaning and action: Control systems theories in sociology (pp. 163–188). New York: MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lovin, L. (2015). Interpreting and responding to events in arabic culture, final report. Durham, NC. Distributed at UGA affect control theory website. http://research.franklin.uga.edu/act/.

  • Smith-Lovin, L., Soudi, A., Robinson, D. T., Cannon, B. C., Curdy, B., Kriegel, D. J., & Morgan, J. H. (2016). Mean affective ratings of identities, behaviors, and modifiers by residents of Rabat, Morocco in 2014–2015. Distributed at UGA affect control theory website. http://research.franklin.uga.edu/act/.

  • Stets, J. E. (1997). Status and identity in marital interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 185–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2005). Identity verification, control, and aggression in marriage. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(2), 160–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G. P. (1981/2006). Appearance and the self: A slightly revised version. In D. Brissett & C. Edgley (Eds.), Life as theater: A dramaturgical sourcebook (pp. 141–162). New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transactions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., Serpe, R. T., & Hunt, M. O. (2005). Making good on a promise: The impact of larger social structures on commitments. Advances in Group Processes, 22, 93–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1980/2000). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA/Caldwell, NJ: Benjamin-Cummings/Blackburn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. (1953). In H. S. Perry & M. L. Gawel (Eds.) Interpersonal theory of psychology. New York, NY: WW Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. This volume. The link between identity importance and identity salience: Context matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. H., & Lynn, F. B. (2013). The embedded self: A social networks approach to identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 76(2), 151–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, E. A., & Deutschberger, P. (1963). Some dimensions of altercasting. Sociometry, 454–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, B., & Heise, D. R. (1987). Expectations, intentions, and behavior: Some tests of affect control theory. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 13(1–2), 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willigan, D., & Heise, D. R. (2006). Mean affective ratings of 1,026 concepts by catholic high school students in Belfast, Northern Ireland in 1977.https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~jhoey/research/ACTBackup/ACT/index.htm

  • Zhao, J. (2017). The role of educational expectations, friendship networks, and moral codes in the mental health of adolescents (Ph.D.). University of Georgia, Athens, GA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawn T. Robinson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Robinson, D.T., Smith-Lovin, L., Zhao, J. (2020). The Role of the Other: How Interaction Partners Influence Identity Maintenance in Four Cultures. In: Serpe, R.T., Stryker, R., Powell, B. (eds) Identity and Symbolic Interaction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41231-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics