Abstract
Using courtroom observations, in-depth interviews, and third-party media accounts, we examine identity management by lawyers facing challenges to verification of prominent role and social identities implicated by participation in Operation Streamline. A controversial criminal procedure in which undocumented border crossers are processed en masse, Operation Streamline provides a strategic case for theory building integrating internal and external role and social identity processes. Relying on systematic interpretative methods to refract non-laboratory data through the conceptual lens of identity theory, we found that defense attorneys participating in Operation Streamline experienced substantial role strain, that is, felt problems in meeting role expectations, because they were torn between role-related values of substantive justice and formal legality that could not be satisfied simultaneously. However, they also perceived these two values to provide culturally available and positive but competing role identity standards to draw from as resources to deflect potential non-verification of their professional identities. Latino/a lawyers—who faced intensified professional role strain and also conflict between a role identity standard of formal legality and meanings and expectations associated with their racial/ethnic identity—perceived culturally available, competing social identity group standards based on race/ethnicity and citizenship. Faced with challenges to positive identity confirmation, attorneys pushed back against role and social identity group standards whose adoption would lead to non-verification and adopted instead the competing standards facilitating verification. Based on our findings and conceptual scope conditions pertaining to our empirical case, we propose three theoretical propositions that may link internal, perceptual control and external, social structural identity processes and can be tested in further research.
We thank the National Science Foundation for its support of this research. Stryker also thanks the Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavioral Sciences (CASBS), Stanford University (2016–17), for providing a congenial place to think and write. Authorship is alphabetical; the authors contributed equally to this chapter. An earlier version of this chapter was presented at the Indiana University Identity Conference in April, 2018. We are appreciative of the constructive comments we received in that venue.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bliss, J. (2017). Divided selves: professional role distancing among law students and new lawyers during a period of market crisis. Law and Social Inquiry, 42(3), 855–897.
Brenner, P. S., Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (2018). Role-specific self-efficacy as precedent and product of the identity model. Sociological Perspectives, 61(1), 57–80.
Burke, P. J. (1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review, 56, 836–849.
Burke, P. J. (2003). Relationships among multiple identities. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, & P. A. Thoits (Eds.), Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 195–204). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Burke, P. J. (2020). Identity dispersion: Flexibility, uncertainty or inconsistency? This volume.
Burke, P. J., & Cerven, C. D. (2015). Emotional outcomes from identity accumulation and verification. Paper presented at the International Society for Research on Emotion. July, Geneva, Switzerland.
Burke, P. J., & Stryker, S. (2016). Identity theory: progress in relating the two strands. In J. E. Stets & R. T. Serpe (Eds.), New directions in identity theory and research (pp. 657–682). New York: Oxford University Press.
Cantwell, A. M. (2011). Dispersion of identity meanings: exploration and implications. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Riverside.
Cantwell, A. M. (2016). Dispersion of identity meanings, negative emotions, and identity discrepancy. In J. E. Stets & R. T. Serpe (Eds.), New directions in identity theory and research (pp. 571–600). New York: Oxford University Press.
Finch, J. K. (2015). Legal borders, racial/ethnic boundaries: Operation Streamline and identity processes on the U.S.-Mexico border. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.
Granfield, R. (1992). Making elite lawyers: Visions of law at Harvard and beyond. New York: Routledge.
Grassroots Leadership. (2012). Operation Streamline: costs and consequences. http://grassrootsleadership.org/sites/default/files/uploads/GRL_Sept2012_Report%20final.pdf. Accessed January 8, 2019.
Kalkhoff, W., Serpe, R. T., Pollock, J., Miller, B., & Pfeiffer, M. (2016). Neural processing of identity-relevant feedback. In J. E. Stets & R. T. Serpe (Eds.), New directions in identity theory and research (pp. 195–238). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lydgate, J. J. (2010). Assembly-line justice: A review of operation streamline. Chief Justice Earl Warren Institute on Race, Ethnicity and Diversity, University of California, Berkeley School of Law. http://www.law.berkeley.edu/files/Operation_Streamline_Policy_Brief.pdf. Accessed January 8, 2019.
Maroney, T. A. (2017). (What we talk about when we talk about) judicial temperament. Unpublished Paper. Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavioral Sciences (CASBS). On file with authors.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mertz, E. (2007). The language of law school: Learning to think like a lawyer. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Newport, F. (2014). Gallup review: Black and White attitudes toward police; criminal justice system viewed skeptically by Blacks. http://www.gallup.com/poll/175088/gallup-review-black-white-attitudes-toward-police.aspx. Accessed January 8, 2019.
Olson, S. M., & Dzur, A. W. (2003). Reconstructing professional roles in restorative justice programs. Utah Law Review, 1, 57–89.
Pedriana, N., & Stryker, R. (2017). From legal doctrine to social transformation: Comparing U.S. voting rights, equal employment opportunity and fair housing legislation. American Journal of Sociology, 123(1), 86–135.
Robertson, C. B. (2009). Judgement, identity and independence. Connecticut Law Review, 42, 1–89.
Robertson, C. B. (2011). Organizational management of conflicting professional identities. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 43, 603–623.
Scheingold, S. A., & Sarat, A. (2004). Something to believe in: Politics, professionalism and cause lawyering. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Schleef, D. (2006). Managing elites: Professional socialization in law and business schools. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Smith-Lovin, L. (2003). Self, identity, and interaction in an ecology of identities. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, & P. A. Thoits (Eds.), Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 167–178). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Stets, J. E. (2018). Identity theory. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (2nd ed., pp. 81–111). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2005). New directions in identity control theory. Advances in Group Processes, 22, 43–64.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2014). Emotions and identity nonverification. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(4), 387–410.
Stets, J. E., Savage, S. V., Burke, P. J., & Fares, P. (2020). Cognitive and behavioral responses to the identity verification process. This volume.
Stets, J. E., & Serpe, R. T. (2013). Identity theory. In J. Delamater & A. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 31–60). New York: Springer.
Stryker, R. (1996). Beyond history vs. theory: Strategic narrative and sociological explanation. Sociological Methods and Research, 24, 304–352.
Stryker, R. (2000). Legitimacy processes as institutional politics: Implications for theory and research in the sociology of organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 17, 179–223.
Stryker, R. (2007). Half empty, half full or neither? Law, inequality and social change in capitalist democracies. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 69–97.
Stryker, R., Docka-Filipek, D., & Wald, P. (2012). Employment discrimination law and industrial psychology: Social science as social authority and the co-production of law and science. Law and Social Inquiry, 37, 777–814.
Stryker, R., & Stryker, S. (2016). Is Mead’s framework still sound? In J. E. Stets & R. T. Serpe (Eds.), New directions in identity theory and research (pp. 31–57). New York: Oxford University Press.
Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience and role performance. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 4, 558–564.
Stryker, S. (2002 [1980]). Symbolic interaction: A social structural version. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press.
Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 284–297.
Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1994). Identity salience and psychological centrality: Equivalent, overlapping or complementary concepts? Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 16–35.
Sutton, J. (2001). Law/society: Origins, interactions and change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tajfel, H. (2010 [1982]). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Thoits, P. A. (2003). Personal agency in the accumulation of multiple role identities. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, & P. A. Thoits (Eds.), Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 17–19). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Trevizo, P. (2013, March). Operation streamline takes hard line on illegal border crossers. Arizona Daily Star. https://tucson.com/news/local/border/operation-streamline-takes-hard-line-on-illegal-border-crossers/article_35cb6dc5-45e3-55e5-b471-c1dd2a72bc31.html. Accessed January 8, 2019.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. In G. Roth, C. Wittich (Eds.) translated by E. Fischoff. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Finch, J.K., Stryker, R. (2020). Competing Identity Standards and Managing Identity Verification. In: Serpe, R.T., Stryker, R., Powell, B. (eds) Identity and Symbolic Interaction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41231-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41231-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41230-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41231-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)