Abstract
This study is an interdisciplinary research that applies Phronesis in Social Sciences illustrated in Internet research methodologies in an experimental intervention research design to investigate the impact of the usage of internet communication technologies on the reconciliation process, applied in a case study in the Palestinian –Israeli context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Mohammed Dajani Daoudi, is the founder of the Wasatia movement in Palestine, also a founder and former director of the American Studies at Alquds University.
- 2.
Barakat, Z. (2017). From Heart of Stone to Heart of Flesh: Evolutionary Journey from Extremism to Moderation. München: Herbert Utz Verlag GmbH.
- 3.
Wasatia: A term used to identify Moderation in Islamic theology.
- 4.
cf. Vrasidas et al. 2009, p. 233.
- 5.
Professor Mohammad Dajani Daoudi, is the founder of Wasatia Movement in Palestine in 2007and the Former Dirctor of the American Studies Institute at Al-Quds University.
- 6.
The term is form a research done by Barakat, Z. (2017). From Heart of Stone to Heart of Flesh: Evolutionary Journey from Extremism to Moderation. München: Herbert Utz Verlag GmbH. That defines Wasatia Circl as a transfromation from reconciliation to moderation that leads to democracy.
Bibliography
Books
Barakat, Z. (2017). From heart of stone to heart of flesh: Evolutionary journey from extremism to moderation. München: Herbert Utz Verlag GmbH.
Bar-Siman-Tov, Y. (Ed.). (2004). From conflict resolution to reconciliation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bekerman, Z., & Horenzsyk, G. (2009). Computer supported collaborative Intercultural Education. In C. Vrasidas, M. Zembylas, & G. Glass (Eds.), ICT for education, development and social justice (pp. 201–213) Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
Bernhard, B. (1952). Content analysis in communicative research. New York: Free Press.
Boellstrorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., & Taylor, T. (2012). Ethnography and the virtual world: A handbook of methods. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cammaert, B., & Carpentier, N. (2007). Reclaiming the media: Communication rights and democratic media roles. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world social theory and digital media practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design qualitative quantitative mixed-methods approach (4th ed.). California: SAGE.
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed-method research (2nd ed.). California: SAGE.
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed-Methods Research. London: SAGE. Available at Amazon [Kindle Edition].
Cronin, C. (2008). Between naturalism and religion by Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge: Polity. [German, 2005b].
Elster, J. (1998). Deliberative democracy (Cambridge studies in the theory of democracy). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175005.
Fishkin, J. (2009). When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2013). Mega projects and risks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., & Schram, S. (Eds.). (2012). Applied Phronesis in Real Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.
Gastil, J., & Levine, P. (2005a). The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century. New York: Wiley.
Gould, M. (2013). Social media gospel. Minnesota: Liturgical Press.
Green, J. C. (2007). Mixed-methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2009). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kozinets, R. (2015). Netnography redefined (2nd ed.). California: SAGE.
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Pennsylvania: SAGE.
Leiner, M., & Flämig, S. (Hg.). (2012). Latin America between conflict and reconciliation. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Leiner, M., & Schließer, C. (Eds.). (2018). Alternative approaches in conflict resolution. Palgrave Macmillan.
Lenhardt, C., & Nicholsen, W. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Original in German, published in 1983].
Luskin, R. C. (2003). The heavenly public: What would the ideal democratic citizenry be like? In M. B. MacKuen & G. Rabinowitz (Eds.), Electoral Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Lysack, C. L., Krefting, L., & Gliner, J. A. (1994). Qualitative methods in field research: An Indonesian experience in community based practice. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 14(2), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/153944929401400203.
Mcleod, S., & Lehmann, C. (2012). What school leaders need to know about digital technologies and social media. San Francisco: Wiley.
Miall, H. (2003). Conflict transformation: A multi-dimensional task. Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management – Edited version, August 2004 (First launch March 2001).
Newman, M. (2010). Networks: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pool, I. (1983). Technologies of Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Ritzer, G. (2008). Classical sociological theory (5th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill Higher Education.
Saldana, J. (2013a). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). London: SAGE. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Los Angeles: SAGE. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.
Selian, B. A. (2002). ICTs in support of human rights, democracy, and good governance. Geneva: International Union Telecommunication.
Vrasidas, C., Zembylas, M., & Glass, G. (2009). ICT for education development and social justice. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Articles in Journals & Chapters in Books
Basset, E. H., & O'Riordan, K. (2002). Contesting the human subject research model, ethics and information technologies. Ethics of Internet Research, 4, 233–247.
Boneva, B., Kraut, R., & Frohlich, D. (2001). Using email for personal relationships. American Behavioral Sciences., 43(3), 530–549.
Botes, J. (2001, Autumn/Winter). Conflict transformation: A debate over semantics Botes. The International Journal of Peace Studies, 6(2), 1–4.
Brantmeier, E. (2009). ICT for peace and reconciliation. In C. Vrasidas, M. Zembylas, & G. Glass (Eds.), ICT for education, development and social justice (pp. 213–236). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Cohen, J. (1998). Democracy and liberty. In J. Elster (Ed.), Deliberative democracy (Cambridge studies in the theory of democracy) (pp. 185–231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175005.010.
Cole, R., & Crawford, T. (2007). Building peace through information and communications technologies. Accessed 24 Jan 2016. Available at http://apo.org.au/node/16132
Cuban, L. (2003). Review of oversold and underused computers in the classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 42–45.
Dajani, M. (2009, December). The Arab peace initiative: Lost in the translation. Crosscurrent, 59(4), 532–539.
Dangwal, K. L., & Srivastava, S. (2015). Fostering peace education through ICT. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews., 2(2), 64–73.
Ess, C., & Jones, S. (2004). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the aoir ethics working committee. In Reading in Virtual Ethics Issues and Contverseries (p. 357). Hershey: Information Science Publishing.
Fishkin, J., & Habermas, J. (1995). The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy, deliberative politics. In Estlund (Ed.), Democracy, deliberative politics (p. 33, 114–115, 120–121). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Gastil, J., & Levine, P. (2005b). The deliberative democracy handbook. In The deliberative democracy handbook. New York: Wiley.
Gibson, J. (2006). The contribution of truth to reconciliation: Lessons from South Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3(50), 409–432.
Hattotuwa, S. (2004). Untying the Gordian knot: ICT for conflict transformation and peacebuilding. Dialogue, 2(2), 39–68.
Jentz, N. K., & Zimmerman, M. (1996). Evaluation of 37 AIDS projects: Successful approaches and barriers to program effectiveness. Health Education Quarterly, 23(1), 80–97.
Karefe, J. H. (2012). Participation through mobile phones: A study of SMS use during the Ugandan general elections 2011. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on information and communication technologies and development (pp. 249–258).
Kohlbacher, F. (2012). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1), 1–30. From http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0601211.
Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using Netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(1), 61–72.
Larrauri, H. P. (2013). New technologies and conflict prevention in Sudan and South Sudan. In F. Mancini (Ed.), International Peace Institute – New Technologies and Conflict Prevention in Sudan and South Sudan (pp. 71–86).
Nussbaum, S. (2012). Social media is changing the way we live and learn. In What school leaders need to know about digital technologies and social media (pp. 67–73). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
O’Malley, M., Leiner, M., Summe, D., & Knoeppfler, N. (Hrsg.). (2017). Thüringen: Braucht das Land Versöhnung? Kritisches Jahrbuch der Philosophie, Band 17. 17 ed. Jena: Thüringischen Gesellschaft für Philosophie e.V.Vorsitzender: Klaus-M. Kodalle.
Saldana, J. (2013b). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). London: SAGE. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.
Sandelowski, M. (2000, August). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing and Health, 23(4), 334–340.
Skinner, B. F. (1985). Quoted in Bourdieu’s theory of practice as theoretical framework. In Repatriation to France and Germany, mir-Edition (p. 7). © Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05700-8_2.
Walther, M. (2014). Repatriation to France and Germany (mir-Edition) (pp. 7–16). © Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05700-8_2.
Internet Resources
Dajani, M. (2007). Wasatia Booklet. Ramallah: Modern Press. Accessed at 9 Sept 2015. Available at http://www.wasatia.info/articles/about-wasatia.html
Dajani, M. (2010). Wasatia-the-middle-road article: الوسطية تحديات الواقع الفلطسيني. Accessed 12 Oct 2014. Available at http://www.wasatia.info/articles/about-wasatia/16-wasatia-the-middle-road.html
Dajani, M. (2014). Wasatia NGO. Accessed 15 Jan 2016. Available at www.wasatia.info/aboutWasatia
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Accessed 6 May 2015. Available at from http://qix.sagepub.com/content/12/2/219.short
Jorgic, B. (2013). Kenya tracks Facebook, Twitter for election “hate speech.” Accessed 20 Apr 2014. Available at http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/05/kenya-elections-socialmedia-idUSL5N0B4C4120130205, 05, 2-5.
Leiner, M. (2015a). https://de.wikipedia.org. (n.d.). Wikipedia. Accessed 15 Sept 2015. From https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Leiner#cite_note-10
Leiner, M. (2015b, January 13). Hearts of flesh not stone: AICGS. Accessed 17 Mar 2015. Available at: https://www.aicgs.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Leiner_HeartsWashington_2-3-2015.pdf
Oliver P. Richmond, Ioannis Tellidis, Emerging Actors in International Peacebuilding and Statebuilding: Status Quo or Critical States?. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 20 (4):563-584
Penna, S. E. Q. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVIVO. [Online 7 June 2013]. Accessed 20 May 2014. Available at from www.youtube.com: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YyVySrV2cM
Perera, M. (2015). Reconciliation in Sri Lanka: The role of ICT. [Online 30, June 2015]. Accessed 20 Jan 2016. Available at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/reconciliation-sri-lanka-role-ict-mahesh-perera
Schulz, D. (2012). YouTube – analyzing your interviews. Accessed 4 May 2015. Available at Southampton Education School. Available at http://www.southampton.ac.uk/~sesvideo/
Toni, G. L. A., & van der Meer. (2016). Public Frame Building: The Role of Source Usage in Times of Crisis. Communication Research, 45(6), 956–981.
UNDP. (2008). Action for cooperation and trust (ACT): Building lasting relationships islandwide. Nicosia: UNDP-ACT.
Weitzman, P. F., & Levkoff, S. E. (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in health research with minority elders: Lesson from a study of dementia caregiving. Fields Methods, 12(3), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X0001200302
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
AlDajani, I.M. (2020). Internet Communication Research Overview. In: Internet Communication Technology (ICT) for Reconciliation. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41203-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41203-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41202-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41203-6
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)