Skip to main content

Information-Loss-Bounded Policy Optimization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reinforcement Learning Algorithms: Analysis and Applications

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 883))

  • 3040 Accesses

Abstract

Proximal and trust-region policy optimization methods (PPO and TRPO) belong to the standard reinforcement learning toolbox. Notably, PPO can be viewed as transforming the constrained TRPO problem into an unconstrained one, either via turning the constraint into a penalty or via objective clipping. In this chapter, an alternative problem reformulation is studied, where the information loss is bounded using a novel transformation of the KullbackLeibler (KL) divergence constraint. In contrast to PPO, the considered method does not require tuning of the regularization parameter, which is known to be hard due to its sensitivity to the reward scaling. The resulting algorithm, termed information-loss-bounded policy optimization (ILBPO), both enjoys the benefits of the first-order methods, being straightforward to implement using automatic differentiation, and maintains the advantages of the quasi-second order methods. It performs competitively in simulated OpenAI MuJoCo environments and achieves robust performance on a real robotic task of the Furuta pendulum swing-up and stabilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amari, S.I.: Natural gradient works efficiently in learning. Neural Comput. 10(2), 251–276 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bagnell, J.A., Schneider, J.: Covariant policy search. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 1019–1024. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brockman, G., Cheung, V., Pettersson, L., Schneider, J., Schulman, J., Tang, J., Zaremba, W.: Openai gym. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01540 (2016)

  4. Dhariwal, P., Hesse, C., Klimov, O., Nichol, A., Plappert, M., Radford, A., Schulman, J., Sidor, S., Wu, Y., Zhokhov, P.: Openai Baselines (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fantoni, I., Lozano, R.: Non-linear Control for Underactuated Mechanical Systems. Springer Science & Business Media (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kakade, S.M.: A natural policy gradient. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pp. 1531–1538 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

  8. Minsky, M.: Steps toward artificial intelligence. Proc. IRE 49(1), 8–30 (1961)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Peters, J., Mülling, K., Altun, Y.: Relative entropy policy search. In: Proceedings of the 24th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 1607–1612 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schulman, J., Levine, S., Abbeel, P., Jordan, M., Moritz, P.: Trust region policy optimization. In: International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 1889–1897 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schulman, J., Moritz, P., Levine, S., Jordan, M., Abbeel, P.: High-dimensional continuous control using generalized advantage estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.02438 (2015)

  12. Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., Klimov, O.: Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347 (2017)

  13. Sutton, R.S., McAllester, D.A., Singh, S.P., Mansour, Y.: Policy gradient methods for reinforcement learning with function approximation. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pp. 1057–1063 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Todorov, E., Erez, T., Tassa, Y.: Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control. In: International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 5026–5033 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Williams, R.J.: Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist reinforcement learning. Mach. Learn. 8(3–4), 229–256 (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunlong Song .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Song, Y. (2021). Information-Loss-Bounded Policy Optimization. In: Belousov, B., Abdulsamad, H., Klink, P., Parisi, S., Peters, J. (eds) Reinforcement Learning Algorithms: Analysis and Applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 883. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41188-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics