Abstract
A network theory of governance situates learning processes in the sharing of stories (which we might call ‘agency’) against a background of traditions and norms (which could be seen as ‘structure’). This perspective has implications for both the conceptualisation and study of learning and innovation as a distributed process within organisations. This chapter explores, and develops further, the role of stories in innovation by drawing on aspects of practice theory, in particular, John Shotter’s concept of ‘dialogical practice’ which explores the co-construction of agency through dialogue which represents a ‘third’ way of knowing that does not belong to any one individual, but is a shared, creative act. If such stories are co-constructed through interaction, rather than being formulated and shared by individuals, this has implications for how we conceptualise agency in learning and innovation processes. When considered dialogically, stories can be seen as enduring or ephemeral, and to support or impede change, depending on the networks though which they are co-constructed. This chapter explores this idea using ethnographic evidence from an NHS provider in England of specialist eye services managing a network of clinics. It examines the planning and implementation of innovation through this network and the ways in which the co-construction of stories draws on professional power, and the potential for both creativity and breakdown as they unfold, influence the resulting innovation processes. This perspective also has practical implications for the use of ethnography as a method for inquiring into innovation processes through stories.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Best, A., Greenhalgh, T., Lewis, S., Saul, J. E., Carroll, S., & Bitz, J. (2012). Large-system transformation in health care: A realist review. Milbank Quarterly, 90(3), 421–456.
Bevir, M.,& Richards, D. (2009a). Decentring policy networks: A theoretical agenda. Public administration, 87(1), 3–14.
Bevir, M., & Richards, D. (2009b). Decentring policy networks: Lessons and prospects. Public Administration, 87(1), 132–141.
Bevir, M., & Waring, J. (Ed.). (2018). Decentring health policy: Learning from British experiences in healthcare governance. London: Routledge.
Bloomfield, B. P., & Danieli, A. (1995). The role of management consultants in the development of information technology: The indissoluble nature of socio-political and technical skills. Journal of Management Studies, 32(1), 23–46.
Boje, D. M. (1991). The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(1), 106–126.
Cameron, A., Lart, R., Bostock, L., & Coomber, C. (2014). Factors that promote and hinder joint and integrated working between health and social care services: A review of research literature. Health and Social Care in the Community, 22(3), 225–233.
Lipsky, M. (1971). Street-level bureaucracy and the analysis of urban reform. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 6(4), 391–409.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2009, April). Glaucoma diagnosis and management of chronic open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension, NICE clinical guideline 85.
National Patient Safety Agency. (2009). Rapid response report NPSA/2009/RRR004: Preventing delay to follow up for patients with glaucoma. Available at https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NPSA_RRR_on_glaucoma_2009_supporting_info.pdf. Accessed 7 April 2019.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shotter, J. (1993). Cultural politics of everyday life: Social constructionism, rhetoric and knowing of the third kind. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
Shotter, J. (1997). Dialogical realities: The ordinary, the everyday, and other strange new worlds. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 27(2–3), 345–357.
Shotter, J. (2010). Situated dialogic action research: Disclosing ‘‘beginnings’’ for innovative change in organizations. Organizational Research Methods, 13(2), 268–285.
Turner, S., Goulding, L., Denis, J. L., McDonald, R., & Fulop, N. J. (2016a). Major system change: A management and organisational research perspective. In Raine, R., Fitzpatrick, R., Barratt, H., Bevan, G., Black, N., Boaden, R. et al. Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health. Health Services and Delivery Research, 4(16), 85–104.
Turner, S., Ramsay, A., Perry, C., Boaden, R., McKevitt, C., Morris, S. et al. (2016b). Lessons for major system change: Centralization of stroke services in two metropolitan areas of England. Journal of health services research & policy, 21(3), 156–165.
Van de Ven, A. H. (2017). The innovation journey: You can’t control it, but you can learn to maneuver it. Innovation, 19(1), 39–42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Turner, S., Wright, J.S.F. (2020). Sharing Stories or Co-Constructing Practice? Challenges to Undertaking and Researching Innovation Using Evidence from the English NHS. In: Bevir, M., Waring, J. (eds) Decentring Health and Care Networks. Organizational Behaviour in Healthcare. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40889-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40889-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40888-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40889-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)