Skip to main content

Psychogenic Illness on the Battlefield: From the Civil War to Gulf War Syndrome

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Havana Syndrome

Abstract

In this chapter we address claims that ‘Havana Syndrome’ is a novel clinical entity that has never been previously encountered by physicians. For over a century, and coinciding with advancements in medical surveillance, a curious pattern has emerged among soldiers returning from the theatre of war: the appearance of clusters of unexplained symptoms that parallel the complaints experienced by Embassy staff in Cuba. During the First World War and Civil War it was named shell shock and soldier’s heart. In the Second World War it was dubbed Combat Stress Reaction. During the Vietnam War, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder was used to describe the condition, while more recently it has been labeled Gulf War Syndrome. The common theme in these conditions is the appearance of psychogenic symptoms in soldiers exposed to the trauma of war. These illness clusters typically involve the appearance of persistent neurological complaints that can and have been misdiagnosed as concussions and brain damage. The American diplomats were being continuously surveilled in a hostile environment amid unfamiliar sounds that were framed within the Cold War context of Cuban-American relations, giving rise to a folk belief that they were being targeted with an acoustical weapon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jones E, HodginsVermaas R, McCartney H, Everitt B, Beech C, Poynter D, et al. Post-combat syndromes from the Boer War to the Gulf War: a cluster analysis of their nature and attribution. BMJ. 2002;324:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bentley S. A short history of PTSD: from Thermopylae to Hue, soldiers have always had a disturbing reaction to war. The Veteran. 2005. http://archive.vva.org/archive/TheVeteran/2005_03/feature_HistoryPTSD.htm. Accessed 10 Nov 2019.

  3. Jones E, Wessely S. Shell shock to PTSD: military psychiatry from 1900 to the Gulf War. New York: Psychology Press; 2005. p. 2.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Da Costa J. On irritable heart: a clinical study of a form of functional cardiac disorder and its consequences. Am J Med Sci. 1871;61:17–52.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jones E. Historical approaches to post-combat disorders. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2006;361:533–42. See pp. 534–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rubin R. More questions raised by concussion-like symptoms found in US diplomats who served in Havana. JAMA. 2018;319(11):1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Osborne L. Come on in, America: the United States in world war. New York: Abrams; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Toland E. The aftermath of battle: with the red cross in France. New York: The Macmillan Company; 1916. p. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alexander C. The shock of war. Smithsonian Magazine. 2010;41(5):58–64, 66. See p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Myers CS. A contribution to the study of shell shock. Lancet. 1915;186:316–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Myers CS. Shell shock in France 1914–1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Salmon TW. The care and treatment of mental diseases and war neurosis. New York: National Committee for Mental Hygiene; 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Loughran T. Shell shock, and the First World War: the making of a diagnosis and its histories. J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2012;67(1):94–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrq052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Linden S, Jones E. ‘Shell shock’ revisited: an examination of the case records of the national hospital in London. Med Hist. 2014;58(4):519–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2014.51. The London Hospital was called the Hospital for the Paralyzed and Epileptic at the time

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. French and German neurologists and psychiatrists were even more barbaric. Most felt that shell shock reflected the unconscious need to escape the hell of war. Since hysterical symptoms were thought to be the product of suggestion, the soldiers had to be persuaded to abandon them. The notion that sufferers were weak-willed and even faking, was common among commanding officers, particularly generals. Heavy losses on the battlefield and the need for replacements influenced the aggressive treatments. The most common treatment used by French and German doctors was a combination of suggestion and shock therapy. German doctor Fritz Kaufman developed the “Kaufman cure” consisting of shocks and forced military drills accompanied by loudly shouted orders. Soldiers with paralysis received painful electrical impulses to the paralyzed limb until they gave up and began to move it. In Vienna, Doctors applied shocks to the mouth and testicles of soldiers with shell shock. In France, neurosurgeon Clovis Vincent organized a re-education camp along the banks of the Loire. Soldiers were shocked, threatened and abused until they gave up on their psychogenic symptoms. Vincent, who was known for his forceful personality, would do whatever it took to break a soldier’s will, to the point of using extra-large electrodes to deliver a massive current. After the war, doctors on the winning side were largely forgiven for their ruthless behavior, but in Germany, some soldiers and their families sought revenge and several neurologists were chased from their offices. In Austria, psychiatrist Julius Wagner-Jauregg was charged with war crimes for his ruthless treatment of soldiers with ‘shell shock’ but he was eventually acquitted. Sigmund Freud was called as an expert witness at the trial. See: Scull A. Hysteria: the disturbing history. New York: Oxford University Press;2009. p. 168–73.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cannon WB. Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear and rage: an account of recent researches into the function of emotional excitement. New York: Appleton; 1915.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahrenfeldt RH. Psychiatry in the British army in the second world war. New York: Columbia University Press; 1958. p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weinstein EA. Conversion disorders. In: Jones FD, Sparacino MA, Wilcox VL, Rothberg JM, Stokes JW, editors. War psychiatry. Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General at TMM Publications; 1995. p. 383–407.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Grinker RR, Spiegel JP. Men under stress. Philadelphia: Blakiston; 1945.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Crocq M, Crocq L. From shell shock and war neurosis to posttraumatic stress disorder: a history of psychotraumatology. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2000;2(1):47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jones E. Army psychiatry in the Korean War: the experience of 1 Commonwealth Division. Mil Med. 2000;165(4):256–60. See p. 259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Friedman MJ. PTSD history and overview. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bhattacharjee Y. Shell shock revisited: solving the puzzle of blast trauma. Science. 2008;319(5862):406–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nelson L, Tarima S, LaRoche A, Hammeke T, Barr W, Guskiewicz K. Preinjury somatization symptoms contribute to clinical recovery after sport-related concussion. Neurology. 2016;86(20):1856–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. This possibility is real given that sufferers may be in line to receive disability payments, pensions or file lawsuits which seek compensation. Symptoms may be a soldier’s ticket out of a combat zone. In Germany, just before the First World War, there was an outbreak of “pension neurosis” after the government passed a law that provided pensions for victims of railway and industrial accidents who developed mental and nervous problems. With the onset of the war, the German government was determined to prevent a similar outbreak of war neurosis so they supported an unsympathetic treatment of soldiers with shell shock. Follow-up studies of people with post-concussion symptoms consistently show that those with compensation claims have more and lasting symptoms than those without compensation claims.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cotton P. Veterans seeking answers to syndrome suspect they were goats in Gulf War. JAMA. 1994;271:1559–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jaynes G. Walking wounded. Esquire. May 1994:70–6.

    Google Scholar 

  28. France D. The families who are dying for our country. Redbook. Sept 1994:114–7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Showalter E. Hystories: hysterical epidemics and modern media. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Darcangelo V. VA takes tough stance on Gulf War illness. Sharon: The Herald; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Clauw D, Engel CC, Aronowitz R, Jones E, Kipen HM, Kroenke K, et al. Unexplained symptoms after terrorism and war: an expert consensus statement. J Occup Med. 2001;45(10):1040–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000091693.43121.2f.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Price J. New York firefighters suffer after effects. The Washington Times. 3 Nov 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert W. Baloh .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Baloh, R.W., Bartholomew, R.E. (2020). Psychogenic Illness on the Battlefield: From the Civil War to Gulf War Syndrome. In: Havana Syndrome. Copernicus, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40746-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40746-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Copernicus, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40745-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40746-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics