Abstract
In this chapter we address claims that ‘Havana Syndrome’ is a novel clinical entity that has never been previously encountered by physicians. For over a century, and coinciding with advancements in medical surveillance, a curious pattern has emerged among soldiers returning from the theatre of war: the appearance of clusters of unexplained symptoms that parallel the complaints experienced by Embassy staff in Cuba. During the First World War and Civil War it was named shell shock and soldier’s heart. In the Second World War it was dubbed Combat Stress Reaction. During the Vietnam War, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder was used to describe the condition, while more recently it has been labeled Gulf War Syndrome. The common theme in these conditions is the appearance of psychogenic symptoms in soldiers exposed to the trauma of war. These illness clusters typically involve the appearance of persistent neurological complaints that can and have been misdiagnosed as concussions and brain damage. The American diplomats were being continuously surveilled in a hostile environment amid unfamiliar sounds that were framed within the Cold War context of Cuban-American relations, giving rise to a folk belief that they were being targeted with an acoustical weapon.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Jones E, HodginsVermaas R, McCartney H, Everitt B, Beech C, Poynter D, et al. Post-combat syndromes from the Boer War to the Gulf War: a cluster analysis of their nature and attribution. BMJ. 2002;324:1–7.
Bentley S. A short history of PTSD: from Thermopylae to Hue, soldiers have always had a disturbing reaction to war. The Veteran. 2005. http://archive.vva.org/archive/TheVeteran/2005_03/feature_HistoryPTSD.htm. Accessed 10 Nov 2019.
Jones E, Wessely S. Shell shock to PTSD: military psychiatry from 1900 to the Gulf War. New York: Psychology Press; 2005. p. 2.
Da Costa J. On irritable heart: a clinical study of a form of functional cardiac disorder and its consequences. Am J Med Sci. 1871;61:17–52.
Jones E. Historical approaches to post-combat disorders. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2006;361:533–42. See pp. 534–7
Rubin R. More questions raised by concussion-like symptoms found in US diplomats who served in Havana. JAMA. 2018;319(11):1079.
Osborne L. Come on in, America: the United States in world war. New York: Abrams; 2017.
Toland E. The aftermath of battle: with the red cross in France. New York: The Macmillan Company; 1916. p. 97.
Alexander C. The shock of war. Smithsonian Magazine. 2010;41(5):58–64, 66. See p. 58.
Myers CS. A contribution to the study of shell shock. Lancet. 1915;186:316–20.
Myers CS. Shell shock in France 1914–1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1940.
Salmon TW. The care and treatment of mental diseases and war neurosis. New York: National Committee for Mental Hygiene; 1917.
Loughran T. Shell shock, and the First World War: the making of a diagnosis and its histories. J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2012;67(1):94–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrq052.
Linden S, Jones E. ‘Shell shock’ revisited: an examination of the case records of the national hospital in London. Med Hist. 2014;58(4):519–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2014.51. The London Hospital was called the Hospital for the Paralyzed and Epileptic at the time
French and German neurologists and psychiatrists were even more barbaric. Most felt that shell shock reflected the unconscious need to escape the hell of war. Since hysterical symptoms were thought to be the product of suggestion, the soldiers had to be persuaded to abandon them. The notion that sufferers were weak-willed and even faking, was common among commanding officers, particularly generals. Heavy losses on the battlefield and the need for replacements influenced the aggressive treatments. The most common treatment used by French and German doctors was a combination of suggestion and shock therapy. German doctor Fritz Kaufman developed the “Kaufman cure” consisting of shocks and forced military drills accompanied by loudly shouted orders. Soldiers with paralysis received painful electrical impulses to the paralyzed limb until they gave up and began to move it. In Vienna, Doctors applied shocks to the mouth and testicles of soldiers with shell shock. In France, neurosurgeon Clovis Vincent organized a re-education camp along the banks of the Loire. Soldiers were shocked, threatened and abused until they gave up on their psychogenic symptoms. Vincent, who was known for his forceful personality, would do whatever it took to break a soldier’s will, to the point of using extra-large electrodes to deliver a massive current. After the war, doctors on the winning side were largely forgiven for their ruthless behavior, but in Germany, some soldiers and their families sought revenge and several neurologists were chased from their offices. In Austria, psychiatrist Julius Wagner-Jauregg was charged with war crimes for his ruthless treatment of soldiers with ‘shell shock’ but he was eventually acquitted. Sigmund Freud was called as an expert witness at the trial. See: Scull A. Hysteria: the disturbing history. New York: Oxford University Press;2009. p. 168–73.
Cannon WB. Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear and rage: an account of recent researches into the function of emotional excitement. New York: Appleton; 1915.
Ahrenfeldt RH. Psychiatry in the British army in the second world war. New York: Columbia University Press; 1958. p. 26.
Weinstein EA. Conversion disorders. In: Jones FD, Sparacino MA, Wilcox VL, Rothberg JM, Stokes JW, editors. War psychiatry. Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General at TMM Publications; 1995. p. 383–407.
Grinker RR, Spiegel JP. Men under stress. Philadelphia: Blakiston; 1945.
Crocq M, Crocq L. From shell shock and war neurosis to posttraumatic stress disorder: a history of psychotraumatology. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2000;2(1):47–55.
Jones E. Army psychiatry in the Korean War: the experience of 1 Commonwealth Division. Mil Med. 2000;165(4):256–60. See p. 259
Friedman MJ. PTSD history and overview. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs; 2016.
Bhattacharjee Y. Shell shock revisited: solving the puzzle of blast trauma. Science. 2008;319(5862):406–8.
Nelson L, Tarima S, LaRoche A, Hammeke T, Barr W, Guskiewicz K. Preinjury somatization symptoms contribute to clinical recovery after sport-related concussion. Neurology. 2016;86(20):1856–63.
This possibility is real given that sufferers may be in line to receive disability payments, pensions or file lawsuits which seek compensation. Symptoms may be a soldier’s ticket out of a combat zone. In Germany, just before the First World War, there was an outbreak of “pension neurosis” after the government passed a law that provided pensions for victims of railway and industrial accidents who developed mental and nervous problems. With the onset of the war, the German government was determined to prevent a similar outbreak of war neurosis so they supported an unsympathetic treatment of soldiers with shell shock. Follow-up studies of people with post-concussion symptoms consistently show that those with compensation claims have more and lasting symptoms than those without compensation claims.
Cotton P. Veterans seeking answers to syndrome suspect they were goats in Gulf War. JAMA. 1994;271:1559–61.
Jaynes G. Walking wounded. Esquire. May 1994:70–6.
France D. The families who are dying for our country. Redbook. Sept 1994:114–7.
Showalter E. Hystories: hysterical epidemics and modern media. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
Darcangelo V. VA takes tough stance on Gulf War illness. Sharon: The Herald; 2017.
Clauw D, Engel CC, Aronowitz R, Jones E, Kipen HM, Kroenke K, et al. Unexplained symptoms after terrorism and war: an expert consensus statement. J Occup Med. 2001;45(10):1040–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000091693.43121.2f.
Price J. New York firefighters suffer after effects. The Washington Times. 3 Nov 2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baloh, R.W., Bartholomew, R.E. (2020). Psychogenic Illness on the Battlefield: From the Civil War to Gulf War Syndrome. In: Havana Syndrome. Copernicus, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40746-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40746-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Copernicus, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40745-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40746-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)