Advertisement

Clean Energy Manufacturing: Renewable Energy Technology Benchmarks

Chapter
  • 504 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Energy book series (LNEN, volume 74)

Abstract

The manufacturing of clean energy technologies has become a global enterprise. An analysis of four clean energy technology manufacturing processes—wind turbine components, crystalline silicon solar photovoltaic modules, light-duty vehicle lithium-ion battery cells, and light-emitting diodes—was conducted to provide a reference point for comparison over time as this sector evolves. The manufacturing supply chain analysis included processing of raw materials, making required subcomponents, and assembling final products, using benchmarks that crossed 12 economies: Brazil, Canada, China, Germany, India, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, South Korea, Republic of China (Taiwan), the United Kingdom, and the United States. Larger economies, with extensive manufacturing supply chains and high prevailing wages, tend to retain more value added from clean energy manufacturing than small economies. Manufacturing of clean energy technologies drives extensive trade among economies to support the widely distributed supply chain links. Production of wind turbine components and photovoltaic modules is more centralized than production of light-emitting diodes and lithium-ion battery cells. Across the four clean energy technologies evaluated, there was generally an excess of manufacturing capacity relative to global supply.

Keywords

Clean energy manufacturing Renewable energy Energy efficiency Global trade Benchmarks 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Ed Balistreri, Rebecca Hill, Donald Chung, Chris Scarlata, Chris Mone, Tian Tian, and Scott Gossett for their contributions to the manuscript.

References

  1. Benchmarks of Clean Energy Manufacturing (2016) Manufacturing analysis center (CEMAC). NREL/TP-6A20-66086. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, COGoogle Scholar
  2. Chung D, Elgqvist E, Santhanagopalan S (2015) Automotive lithium-ion battery supply chain and U.S. competitiveness considerations. Clean Energy Manufacturing Analysis Center. NREL/PR-6A50-63354. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, COGoogle Scholar
  3. Chung D, Elqqvist E, Santhanagopalan S (2016) Automotive lithium-ion cell manufacturing: regional cost structures and supply chain considerations. Clean EnergyGoogle Scholar
  4. Cotrell J (2014) Land-based wind turbine transportation and logistics barriers and their effects on U.S. wind markets. PR-5000-61780. Presented at the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) WINDPOWER 2014 Conference, Las Vegas, NevadaGoogle Scholar
  5. Fu R, James TL, Woodhouse M (2015) Economic measurements of polysilicon for the photovoltaic industry: market competition and manufacturing competitiveness. IEEE J Photovolt 5:2–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goodrich AC, Powell DM, James TL, Woodhouse M, Buonassisi T (2013) Assessing the divers of regional trends in solar photovoltaic manufacturing. Energy Environ Sci 10:85–95Google Scholar
  7. James T, Goodrich A (2013) Supply chain and blade manufacturing considerations in the global wind industry. NREL/PR-6A20-60063. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, COGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnansson TB, Patwardhan A, Nebojsa N, Gomez-Echerverri L (eds) (2012) Global energy assessment: toward a sustainable future. IIASA, Laxenberg, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  9. Moné C, Stehly T, Maples B, Settle E (2015) 2014 cost of wind energy review. TP-5000-64281. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, COGoogle Scholar
  10. Sandor D, Chung D, Keyser D, Mann M, Engel-Cox J (2017) Clean energy manufacturing analysis center benchmark report: framework and methodologies. NREL/TP-6A50-67666. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, COGoogle Scholar
  11. Yang M, Dixon RK, Taylor PG (eds) (2010) Energy efficiency policies and strategies. Energy Policy 38(11):6391–6485Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoldenUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Department of EnergyWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations