Skip to main content

A Systematic Review on IoT and E-Services Co-production

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Information Technology and Systems (ICITS 2020)

Abstract

The availability of different types of data collected by Internet of Things-IoT can be exploited to enhance transparency and promote government action for citizens. However, in this field, how has the approximation between government and citizens been achieved for the co-production of digital public services? Thus, this research aims to identify the applicability of IOT in the coproduction of public services and what the characteristics of related models applicable to public administration. In order to do so, this article carried out a systematic review of the literature, in the period from 2012 to 2018. For this purpose, the database of advanced search Scopus. In general, many authors see IoT as facilitating the concept of smart cities, as well as a new way of managing communities based on information sharing and collaboration. Furthermore, the data collected through IoT can improve the capacity to predict problems in the development of a collective intelligence. The review has shown that there are advantages in the co-production of public services from the use of IoT as an instrument for reaching public value for public administration. However, the exploration of quality aspects of e-government service offerings and the understanding of user preferences are research questions that need to move forward in the face of relevance to society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.scopus.com/.

References

  1. Ramaswamy, V., Gouillart, F.: Building the co-creative enterprise. Harvard Bus. Rev. 88, 100–109 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rasool, G., Pathania, A.: Revisiting marketing mix study of evidences for investigating innovative role of technology in co-creation. J. General Manag. Res. 1(1), 37–50 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gil-Garcia, J., Zhang, J., Puron-Cid, G.: Conceptualizing smartness in government: an integrative and multi-dimensional view. Gov. Inf. Q. 33(3), 524–534 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sato, K.: Mobilidade, Comunicação e Consumo: Expressões da telefonia celular em Angola, Brasil e Portugal, 366 p. Doctoral thesis – Graduação em Ciências da Comunicação, Academia de Comunicação e Artes, Universidade de São Pauo, São Paulo (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sobrinho, G.O.: Serviço de resolução e descoberta de informações sobre objetos em sistemas baseados em RFID. Tese de Doutorado em Engenharia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (2013). http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/3/3141/tde-16102013-162918/pt-br.php. Accessed Nov 2018

  6. Lacerda, F., Lima-Marques, M.: Da necessidade de princípios de Arquitetura da Informação para a Internet das Coisas. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação 20(2), 158–171 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/2356. FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bellavista, P., et al.: Convergence of MANET and WSN in IoT urban scenarios. IEEE Sens. J. 13(10), 3558–3567 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2013.2272099. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. U.S. Government. NIC, National Intelligence Consulate - (Org.). Global trends 2025: a transformed world. Reports & Publications, Washington, 99 p. (2008). https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/Newsroom/Reports%20and%0Pubs/2025_Global_Trends_Final_Report.pd. Accessed Nov 2018. (978-0-16-0)

  9. Zanella, A., et al.: Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet Things J. [s.l.] 1(1), 22–32 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2014.2306328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Szkuta, K., Pizzicannella, R., Osimo, D.: Collaborative approaches to public sector innovation: a scoping study. Telecommun. Policy 38(5–6), 558–567 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.04.002. Accessed Nov 2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Castro, A.: Curso de revisão sistemática e metanálise. 2011 São Paulo: Led-dis/unifesp, 11 p. (2015) http://www.virtual.epm.br/cursos/metanalise. Accessed Nov 2018

  12. Almeida, G., et al.: Co-production of digital services: definitions, frameworks, cases and evaluation initiatives - findings from a systematic literature review. In: Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective, Brazil, pp. 3–19. Springer (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98349-3_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. United Nations. Top leading countries in E-government development. E-Government Survey 2018. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Resources/Infographics. Accessed Jul 2019

  14. Simonofski, A., et al.: Citizen participation in smart cities: evaluation framework proposal. In: 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), pp. 227–236. IEEE, July (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/cbi.2017.21

  15. Webster, C., William, R., Leleux, C.: Smart governance: opportunities for technologically-mediated citizen co-production. Inf. Polity 23(1), 95–110 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-170065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Anthopoulos, G.: Smart government: a new adjective to government transformation or a trick? In: Public Administration and Information Technology, Greece, pp. 263–293. Springer (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57015-0_6

    Google Scholar 

  17. Linders, D.: From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen co-production in the age of social media. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(4), 446–454 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Paletti, A.: Co-production through ICT in the public sector: when citizens reframe the production of public services. LNISO, pp. 141–152 (2016). Springer (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40265-9_10

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fugini, M., Teimourikia, M.: The role of ICT in co-production of e-government public services, pp. 119-139. Springer (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30558-5_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Molinari, F.: Innovative business models for smart cities: overview of recent trends. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Egovernment, Milan, Italy, vol. 1, pp. 483–492. Institute of Public Governance and Management, ESADE Barcelona, Campus Sant Cugat, Barcelona, Spain 14 June 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janine Ulrich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ulrich, J., Gattass e Silva, L., Maciel, C. (2020). A Systematic Review on IoT and E-Services Co-production. In: Rocha, Á., Ferrás, C., Montenegro Marin, C., Medina García, V. (eds) Information Technology and Systems. ICITS 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1137. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40690-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics