Skip to main content

Parallel (Hi)Stories: A Subjective Approach to Energy-Efficient Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy Efficient Building Design

Abstract

Nicolae Iorga (Romanian historian and politician) once said that “who forgets doesn’t deserve.”

This aphorism can be extended to the history of any field of human activity, including the history of building materials, technologies, and styles. Periodically they are “reinvented” from new perspectives, with nuanced or new uses, but with the same defining elements.

Throughout history, buildings have been the “mirror” of their time: they preserve the ideas, values, beliefs, and culture of the era in which they were conceived and elevated, as well as customer values, achieved by economy and technology levels.

Going to the essence (and ignoring fashion and style), the principles of construction have not changed, and they can be identified in all the built heritage that we have inherited, from traditional homes to contemporary trends: high-tech, bioclimatic, eco-buildings, green, etc.

As we build on planet Earth, we need to consider the agents that are acting on buildings, both natural and anthropic. Nature’s laws must be respected: physics, chemistry, and biology are fundamentals, and as Oren Lyons said, (O. Lyons, The Ice is Melting (2004), in https://centerforneweconomics.org/publications/the-ice-is-melting/. Accessed 31 July 2019) “You can’t negotiate with a beetle. You are now dealing with natural law. And if you don’t understand natural law, you will soon.”

It therefore seems reasonable to use the forces of nature in the act of architectural creation and not defy them.

The building components, technologies, and products (because we only refer to them) have a periodic comeback to the present, each time with new contributions given by the technical progress, regarding new construction materials or new performances, while the principles of the whole constructive approach are (always) the same.

This work concerns – in parallel – several technological systems for construction from a geographical, spatial, and temporal perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Also known as “the Brundtland Report,” it was elaborated by the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) and was published in 1987 by the United Nations, 1 year after the Chernobyl accident in the USSR [2].

  2. 2.

    People–Planet–Profit: In other words, the societal, environmental, and economic pillars that developed into four and then five pillars, with the rising of specific problems: safety and cultural issues

  3. 3.

    According to the Regulation (EU) No. 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council, “The construction works must be designed, built and demolished in such a way that the use of natural resources is sustainable and in particular ensure the following:

    (a) Reuse or recyclability of the construction works, their materials and parts after demolition;

    (b) Durability of the construction works;

    (c) Use of environmentally compatible raw and secondary materials in the construction works.”

References

  1. O. Lyons, The Ice is Melting (2004), https://centerforneweconomics.org/publications/the-ice-is-melting/. Accessed 31 July 2019

  2. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf. Accessed 8 July 2019

  3. V. Olgyay, A. Olyay, Design with Climate. Bioclimatic Approach to Architectural Regionalism (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products and repealing Council Directive 89/106/EEC, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/RO/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32011R0305. Accessed 5 Jun 2019

  5. Warming and ventilating apartments by the sun’s rays Inventor: Edward S. Morse, (1881), https://www.google.com/patents/US246626. Accessed 12 Aug 2019

  6. M. Dabaieh, A. Elbably, Ventilated Trombe wall as a passive solar heating and cooling retrofitting approach; a low-tech design for off-grid settlements in semi-arid climates. Sol. Energy 122, 820–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.10.005

  7. https://www.tudelft.nl/en/architecture-and-the-built-environment/research/research-stories/modern-trombe-wall-saves-loads-of-energy/. Accessed 12 Aug 2019

  8. http://www.greendiary.com/interesting-historic-facts-renewable-energy.html

  9. D. Marasco, B. Hunter, P. Culligan, S. Gaffin, W. McGillis, Quantifying evapotranspiration from urban green roofs: A comparison of chamber measurements with commonly used predictive methods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 10273 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vegetation-bearing architectonic structure and system Inventor White Stanley Hart, (1937), https://www.google.com/patents/US2113523. Accessed in 2019

  11. W. Streicher, et al., On the typology, costs, energy performance, environmental quality and operational characteristics of double skin facades in European buildings, in Advances in Building Energy Research, Volume 1, ed. M. Santamouris (2007), p. 3

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Poirazis, Double skin facades, in A Report of IEA SHC Task 34 ECBCS Annex 43, p. 29, Lund Institute of Technology, (2006). Accessed 12 Aug 2019

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Magill, A History And Definition Of Green Roof Technology With Recommendations For Future Research, Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale April 2011, http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1132&context=gs_rp

  14. C.G. Wark, W.W. Wark, Green Roof Specifications and Standards. Establishing an emerging technology The Construction Specifier, August 2003, Vol. 56, No.8, http://www.fussypainting.com/pdf/GreenRoof.pdf

  15. FLL Guideline for the Planning, Execution and Upkeep of Green-Roof Sites

    Google Scholar 

  16. Strabo, “Geography XVI.1.5”, published in Vol. VII Loeb Classical Library edition, 1932, http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Strabo/16A∗.html#1.5translation. Accessed March 2018

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.G. Macqueen, Babylon (Frederick A. Praeger, Inc., Publishers, New York, 1965), p. 158

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Dalley, The Mystery of the Hanging Garden of Babylon. An Elusive World Wonder Traced (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. https://www.stefanoboeriarchitetti.net/en/project/vertical-forest/. Accessed 19 Aug 2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana-Maria Dabija .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dabija, AM. (2020). Parallel (Hi)Stories: A Subjective Approach to Energy-Efficient Design. In: Dabija, AM. (eds) Energy Efficient Building Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40671-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40671-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40670-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40671-4

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics