Skip to main content

Disruptive Technology, Foreign Direct Investment and Private Sector Development Polices in Africa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disruptive Technologies, Innovation and Development in Africa

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

Abstract

The chapter examines how privatization and investment policies can serve as a source of foreign direct investment (FDI) in Africa. The current policy focus on domestic resource mobilization (DRM) needs to be complemented with external resource transfer such as FDI because the latter is a major route for technological spillover and a key source of development finance. Many African countries have been opening their economies to various degrees since the late 1980s. There is an increasing trend in privatizing state enterprises in African countries, and that is encouraging investment from emerging economies such as China, India and Turkey as well as from traditional development partners such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Using a longitudinal/panel data, this chapter discusses the current state and evolution of development finance such as inward foreign direct investment (IFDI) within the context of privatization and investment policies in Africa. It finally emphasizes the role of IFDI for employment and the transfer of technical and management know-how.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The eight building blocs are ECOWAS, EAC, ECCAS, SADC, AMU, IGAD, COMESA and CEN-SAD. Other regional initiatives such as CEPGL and CEMAC, among others, exist but are not recognized by the AUC.

References

  • Akinlo, A. (2004). Foreign Direct Investment and Growth in Nigeria: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Policy Modelling, 26, 627–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1969). Classificatory Notes on the Production and Transmission of Technological Knowledge. American Economic Review, 59(2), 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayanwale, A. B. (2007). FDI and Economic Growth: Evidence from Nigeria. African Economic Research Consortium Paper 165. Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbera, F., & Moores, K. (2013). Firm Ownership and Productivity: A Study of Family and Non-family SMEs. Small Business Economics, 40, 953–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, A., & Kildegaard, A. (2010). Clean Technological Change in Developing-Country Industrial Clusters: Mexican Leather Tanning. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 12(3), 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borensztein, J., DeGregorio, J., & Lee, J. W. (1998). How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth? Journal of International Economics, 45, 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, A. (2012). Green Growth, Green Jobs and Labour Markets. Policy Research Working Paper 5990. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. J. (2002). Source Kicking Away the Ladder: An Unofficial History of Capitalism, Especially in Britain and the United States. Challenge, 45(5), 63–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. J. (2003). Globalization, Economic Development and the Role of the State. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cling, J.-P., Razafindindirakoto, M., & Roubaud, F. (2007). Export Processing Zones in Madagascar: The Impact of the Dismantling of Clothing Quotas on Employment and Labour Standards. IRD Working Document DT/2007–06.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, N., & Fontoura, M. (2007). Determinant Factors of FDI Spillovers—What Do We Really Know? World Development, 35(3), 410–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira, J. A. P., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2017). Environmental Management, Climate Change, CSR, and Governance in Clusters of Small Firms in Developing Countries Toward an Integrated Analytical Framework. Business and Society, 56(1), 130–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, X. (2015). Is Corporate Philanthropy Used as Environmental Misconduct Dressing? Evidence from Chinese Family-Owned Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echandi, R., & Scronce, E. (2016). Three Key Ideas for Creating Effective Investment Policies. World Bank Blog.

    Google Scholar 

  • FDI Markets. (2019). The FDI Report 2019, Global Greenfield Investment Trends, FDI Intelligence, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, M., & Goh, C. (2012). Chinese FDI in Ethiopia: A World Bank Survey. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Mera, L., Kenyon, T., Margalit, Y., Reis, J. G., & Varela, G. (2015). New Voices in Investment. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, T., & Javorcik, B. S. (2011a). Roll Out the Red Carpet and They Will Come: Investment Promotion and FDI Inflows. Economic Journal, 121(557), 1445–1476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Torfinn, & Beata S. Javorcik. (2011b). FDI and Export Upgrading. Economics Series Working Papers 526. University of Oxford, Department of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, T., & Javorcik, B. S. (2013). Investment Promotion and FDI Inflows: Quality Matters. CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo, 59, 337–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermes, N., & Lensink, R. (2003). Foreign direct investment, financial development and economic growth. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(1), 142–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joomun, G. (2006). The Textile and Clothing Industry in Mauritius in the Future of the Textile and Clothing Industry in Sub-Saharan Africa. Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedir, A. (2014). Debating Critical Issues of Green Growth and Energy in Africa: Thinking beyond our lifetimes. In K. T. Hanson et al. (Eds.), Managing Africa’s Natural Resources: Capacities for Development (International Political Economy Series). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedir, A. (2015). Enhancing Regionalism for Intra-African and African Inward Foreign Direct Investment. In K. Hanson (Ed.), Contemporary Regional Development in Africa, The International Political Economy of New Regionalisms Series. Ashgate Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machado, M., & K. Hatakeyama (2018). From Technology Transfer to Disruptive Innovation: The Case of EMBRAER. Proceedings of PICMET ‘18: Technology Management for Interconnected World.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey, (2018). Delivering with Diversity. McKinsey & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narraidoo, K. (2018). FinTech in Mauritius – A ‘Disruptive’ Innovation, DLA Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, C., Page, J., Rand, J., Shimeles, A., Söderbom, M., & Tarp, F. (2018). Linked in by Foreign Direct Investment: The Role of Firm-Level Relationships in Knowledge Transfers in Africa and Asia. WIDER Working Paper 2018/161, Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, A. N., & Nguyen, T. (2007). Foreign Direct Investment in Vietnam: An Overview and Analysis of the Determination of Spatial Distribution. Working Paper, Development and Polices Research Center, Hanoi, Vietnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nhamo, G. (2017). New Global Sustainable Development Agenda: A Focus on Africa. Sustainable Development, 25, 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). Strengthening Chile’s Investment Promotion Strategy. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/investment/investment-policy/chile-investment-promotion-strategy.htm

  • Pigato, M. A. (2000). Foreign Direct Investment in Africa: Old Tales and New Evidence. World BankAfrica Region Working Paper Series No. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollin, R., Heintz, J., & Garrett-Peltier, H. (2009). The Economic Benefits of Investing in Clean Technology. Department of Economic and Political Economy Research Institute (PERI), University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robecka, J., Rosuneeb, S., & Pattison, J. (2012). The Mauritius Apparel Manufacturing Industry: Explorations of the Past to the Present. International Journal of Trade and Commerce-IIARTC, 1(2), 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), Part 2: The Problem of Development: A Conference of the Institute for the Study of Free Enterprise Systems, pp. S71–S102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltani, H., & Ochi, A. (2012). Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Economic Growth: An Approach in Terms of Cointegration for the Case of Tunisia. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 2, 193–207. Tang, S., Selvanathan, E., Selvanathan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, H. (2008). Africa, Industrial Policy and Export Processing Zones: Lessons from Asia, Center for Afro-American and African Studies (CAAS). University of Michigan, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J., Lin, J., & Monga, C. (2013). The Rejuvenation of Industrial Policy. SSRN Scholarly Paper No ID 2333944, Social Science Research Network, Rochester.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2019). Special Economic Zones, World Investment Report. Geneva: Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. H. (2015). The Role of Industrial Policy in Developing Countries. In A. Calcagno, S. Dullien, A. Marquez-Valazquez, & N. M. J. Priewe (Eds.), Rethinking Development Policies After the Financial Crisis, Vol. 1, Making the Case for Policy Space. Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank, (2017). Good Practices for Financial Consumer Protection. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yenkey, C, Doering, L., & Aleves, P. (2015). Multiple Uses of Mobile Money, Implications for Financial Inclusion. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafar, A. (2011). Mauritius: An Economic Success Story. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abbi M. Kedir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Annex 1: Main FDI Destinations (in Billions of Dollars)

Destination

2012

Destination

2013

Destination

2014

Destination

2015

Destination

2016

Destination

2017

Destination

2018

Nigeria

7127.39

South Africa

8300.10

South Africa

5770.66

Angola

10028.22

Angola

−179.52

Egypt

7408.70

Egypt

6797.60

Egypt

6031.00

Mozambique

6175.12

Mozambique

4901.79

Egypt

6925.20

Togo

−46.28

Congo

4406.04

South Africa

5334.00

Mozambique

5629.41

Nigeria

5608.45

Nigeria

4693.83

Mozambique

3866.83

Gambia

−27.70

Ethiopia

4017.10

Congo

4313.14

South Africa

4558.85

Egypt

4256.00

Egypt

4612.00

Congo

3803.30

South Sudan

−17.00

Nigeria

3503.00

Morocco

3640.38

Congo, DRC

3312.14

Morocco

3298.10

Angola

3657.51

Morocco

3254.80

Libya

0.00

Ghana

3255.00

Ethiopia

3310.30

Ghana

3293.43

Ghana

3226.33

Morocco

3561.24

Ghana

3192.30

Mayotte

0.00

Morocco

2686.03

Ghana

2989.00

Morocco

2728.36

Zambia

2099.80

Ghana

3356.99

Nigeria

3064.17

Reunion

0.00

Mozambique

2293.10

Mozambique

2711.13

Sudan

2311.00

Congo, DRC

2098.25

Ethiopia

1855.05

Ethiopia

2626.52

Saint Helena

0.00

South Africa

2006.86

Nigeria

1997.49

Tanzania

1799.60

Tanzania

2087.30

Congo, DRC

1843.17

South Africa

1729.38

Burundi

0.06

Gabon

1498.04

Kenya

1625.92

Zambia

1731.50

Algeria

1696.87

Congo

1659.45

Sudan

1728.37

Comoros

3.57

Congo, DRC

1340.20

Algeria

1506.32

  1. Source: Authors from UNCTAD, 2019, and FDI Markets, 2019

Annex 2: Main FDI Destinations, Ten Years Average (in Billions of Dollars)

Destination

1990–1999

Destination

2000–2009

Destination

2010–2018

Tanzania

1.21

Congo

6.61

Sudan

14.04

Zambia

1.41

Angola

12.19

Congo

17.23

Algeria

1.58

Sudan

12.88

Congo, DR

17.59

Côte d’Ivoire

2.32

Tunisia

13.46

Ethiopia

18.34

Tunisia

4.20

Libya

14.10

Morocco

25.47

Morocco

5.59

Algeria

14.14

Ghana

28.56

Angola

5.74

Morocco

18.27

Mozambique

34.76

Egypt

8.05

South Africa

40.98

South Africa

37.81

South Africa

8.50

Nigeria

41.79

Nigeria

45.46

Nigeria

14.94

Egypt

47.99

Egypt

50.04

  1. Source: Authors from UNCTAD, 2019, and FDI Markets, 2019

Annex 3: Top Ten FDI Receiving African Countries, from the 1990s to the 2010s (in Billions of Dollars)

figure a

Source: Authors from UNCTAD, 2019

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Baricako, J., Kedir, A.M. (2020). Disruptive Technology, Foreign Direct Investment and Private Sector Development Polices in Africa. In: Arthur, P., Hanson, K., Puplampu, K. (eds) Disruptive Technologies, Innovation and Development in Africa. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40647-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics