Skip to main content

Sustainable Corporate Development: A Resource-Oriented Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knowledge, People, and Digital Transformation

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Abstract

Sustainable corporate development can be understood as a strategy that respects not only economic goals but also environmental and social aspects, weigh against each other and thus, ensures the long-term business success. The number of enterprises that are oriented towards corporate sustainability has increased in recent years, but the implementation still encounters a variety of limits. The goal of this chapter is the development of an integrated approach to foster sustainable development on the corporate level. In this context, not only tangible resources (e.g. raw material, energy or machines) but in particular intangible resources (e.g. expertise and professional competence of the employees, corporate culture or relations with stakeholders) are considered key success factors for a sustainable corporate development. For its application, the integrated approach provides a set of instruments and procedures, which can be used for the purpose of analysis, planning, controlling and reporting of sustainable corporate development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Various concepts are used in the sustainability literature to operationalize the concept of resources at company level. Some authors use so-called capital approaches (e.g. IIRC 2013; SIGMA 2003; White 2010). Also in the discussion about intellectual capital, intangible resources in particular are divided into different types of capital (e.g. Alwert et al. 2013; Edvinsson and Malone 1997).

  2. 2.

    For the development of the performance indicator catalogue to promote sustainable corporate development, several KPI collections (e.g. Alwert et al. 2013; Global Reporting Initiative [GRI] 2013; Kaldschmidt 2009; Kohl 2007; VDI 2016) were analysed and evaluated systematically. Based on interim results, expert surveys were conducted among company representatives and scientists from various disciplines in order to prioritise particularly meaningful indicators. Selected results have been incorporated into the catalogue of indicators presented here. For more details on the process and for a more detailed list of indicators see Orth (2016).

  3. 3.

    For developing the principles and content elements of the integrated reporting approach outlined in this chapter, different guidelines for non-financial reporting have been analysed (e.g. Alwert et al. 2013; Gebauer and Westermann 2012; GRI 2013; IIRC 2013). For more details see Orth (2016).

References

  • Alwert K, Bornemann M, Will M, Wuscher S (2013) Wissensbilanz—Made in Germany. Leitfaden 2.0 zur Erstellung einer Wissensbilanz. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Berns M, Townend A, Khayat Z, Balagopal B, Reeves M, Hopkins MS, Kruschwitz N (2009) Sustainability and competitive advantage. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 51(1):19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocca S, Meiren T (2013) Green Services – Studie zu Trends und Perspektiven nachhaltiger Dienstleistungsangebote. 2. überarbeitete Auflage. Fraunhofer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsches Institut für Normung (2011) Leitfaden zur gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung (ISO 26000:2010). English edition: Guidance on social responsibility (ISO 26000:2010). Beuth, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsches Institut für Normung (2015) Quality management systems—fundamentals and vocabulary (ISO 9000:2015). German and English version EN ISO 9000:2015. Beuth, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Drenk D (2009) Nachhaltiges Wirtschaften bei kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen. Eine Untersuchung der ökonomischen und sozialen Effekte von ÖKOPROFIT-Unternehmen. Dissertation, TU Dortmund, Kovač, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles RG, Cheng B, Saltzman D (eds) (2010) The landscape of integrated reporting. Reflections and next steps. Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • EC European Commission (2019) Reflection paper—towards a sustainable Europe by 2030. European Union, 2019. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/factsheets_sustainable_europe_012019_v3.pdf

  • Edvinsson L, Malone T (1997) Intellectual capital. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer J, Westermann U (2012) IÖW/future-Ranking der Nachhaltigkeitsberichte deutscher KMU 2011: Ergebnisse und Trends. Münster, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Reporting Initiative (2013) G4 sustainability reporting guidelines. Reporting principles and standard disclosures. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part1-Reporting-Principles-and-Standard-Disclosures.pdf. Accessed 22 Apr 2016

  • Global Reporting Initiative (2015) Sustainability and reporting trends in 2025—preparing for the future. GRI’s reporting 2025 projects: first analysis paper, May 2015. Retrieved from https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/sustainability-and-reporting-trends-in-2025-1.pdf

  • Hammer M, Champy J (2003) Business Reengineering. Die Radikalkur für das Unternehmen. 7. Auflage. Campus, Frankfurt/Main

    Google Scholar 

  • International Integrated Reporting Council (2013) International <IR> Framework. Retrieved from http://integratedreporting.org/resource/international-ir-framework/

  • Kaldschmidt S (2009) Benchmarking zur Messung und Steigerung der Nachhaltigkeit. In Mertins K, Kohl H (eds) Benchmarking. Leitfaden für den Vergleich mit den Besten. 2. Auflage. Symposion, Düsseldorf, pp 209–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl H (2007) Integriertes Benchmarking für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen. Dissertation, Technische Universität Berlin. IRB, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kölle A (2008) Risikomanagement als strategisches Instrument zum nachhaltigen Wirtschaften. Dargestellt am Beispiel der Ernährungsbranche. Dissertation, Kovač, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Küpper H-U (2005) Controlling. Konzeption, Aufgaben, Instrumente. 4. Auflage. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertins K, Will M, Orth R (2016) Die Wissensbilanz. In: Kohl H, Mertins K, Seidel H (eds) Wissensmanagement im Mittelstand. Grundlagen—Lösungen—Praxisbeispiele. Springer, Berlin, pp 91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Christ G (2010) Nachhaltiges Management. Einführung in Ressourcenorientierung und widersprüchliche Managementrationalitäten. Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Onischka M, Ritthoff M, Liedtke C (2011) Instrumentenwegweiser zur Steigerung der Ressourceneffizienz. Praxishandbuch des Umwelt- und Nachhaltigkeitscontrollings für KMU. 2. Auflage. Books on Demand, Norderstedt

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth R (2016) Nachhaltige Unternehmensentwicklung aus ressourcenorientierter Perspektive: Integrierte Methode zur Bewertung, Steuerung und Berichterstattung für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen. Dissertation, TU Berlin. Fraunhofer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strat Manag J 14(3):179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (2003) The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective, Stanford Business Books. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Promberger K, Spiess H, Kössler W (2006) Unternehmen und Nachhaltigkeit. Eine management-orientierte Einführung in die Grundlagen nachhaltigen Wirtschaftens. Linde, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S (2013) Messung und Steuerung unternehmerischer Nachhaltigkeit. In: Rogall H, Binswanger HC, Ekardt F, Grothe A, Hasenclever W-D, Hauchler I (eds) 3. Jahrbuch Nachhaltige Ökonomie. Im Brennpunkt: Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement. Metropolis, Marburg, pp 285–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Herzig C, Kleiber O, Klinke T, Meyer J-A (2007) Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement in Unternehmen. Von der Idee zur Praxis: Managementansätze zur Umsetzung von Corporate Social Responsibility und Corporate Sustainability. Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM), Lüneburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmelzer HJ, Sesselmann W (2013) Geschäftsprozessmanagement in der Praxis. Kunden zufrieden stellen—Produktivität steigern—Wert erhöhen. 8. überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Hanser, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder RW (2011) Integration der Nachhaltigkeit in Performance Measurement-Systeme von kleinen und mittelständischen Unternehmen. In: Meyer J-A (Hg.) Nachhaltigkeit in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen. Jahrbuch der KMU-Forschung und -Praxis 2011. Lohmar, Eul, S 225–243

    Google Scholar 

  • SIGMA (2003) Sigma guidelines—putting sustainable development into practice: a guide for organisations. http://www.projectsigma.co.uk/Guidelines/SigmaGuidelines.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2017

  • Stahlmann V, Clausen J (1999) Öko-Effizienz und Öko-Effektivität. In: Ökologisches Wirtschaften 3/1999. IÖW and oekom, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Global Compact, Accenture (2013) The UN Global Compact-Accenture CEO study on sustainability 2013. Architects of a better world

    Google Scholar 

  • Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (2014) Resource efficiency—methodical principles and strategies. VDI 4800 Blatt 1:2014-07. Beuth, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (2016) Sustainable management in small and medium-sized enterprises. Guidance notes for sustainable management. VDI Richtlinie 4070, Part 1. Beuth, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Vester F (2015) Die Kunst vernetzt zu denken. Ideen und Werkzeuge für einen neuen Umgang mit Komplexität. Der neue Bericht an den Club of Rome. 10. Auflage. DTV, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White AL (2010) The five capitals of integrated reporting: toward a holistic architecture for corporate disclosure. In: Eccles RG, Cheng B, Saltzman D (eds) The landscape of integrated reporting. Reflections and next steps. Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA, pp 29–32

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald Orth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Orth, R., Kohl, H., Galeitzke, M. (2020). Sustainable Corporate Development: A Resource-Oriented Approach. In: Matos, F., Vairinhos, V., Salavisa, I., Edvinsson, L., Massaro, M. (eds) Knowledge, People, and Digital Transformation. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40390-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics