Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

British South Asian Transnational Marriage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Marriage Migration and Integration

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life ((PSFL))

Abstract

In this chapter we look at patterns and trends transnational marriage among British Pakistani Muslims and British Indian Sikhs, explore attitudes towards transnational marriage and look at how participants own marriages came about. Labour Force Survey data shows a clear downward trend in the popularity of transnational marriage. They also show transnational marriage is less common among those with higher education. We explore the possibility that the opportunity for migration might be ‘exchanged’ for educational capital so that transnational marriage could provide British South Asians access to more educated partners in India or Pakistan. The LFS figures show that educational homogamy (spouses having the same level of education) is the dominant pattern in both transnational and intranational marriages. We nevertheless find evidence of educational selectivity in transnational marriages, with migrant spouses’ educational profiles comparing very favourably to those in the origin countries. The qualitative data from the MMI study shows that educational similarity constitutes just one aspect of understandings of compatibility which make transnational marriage attractive for some, and undesirable for others. Family considerations, such as care for parents as they age, and for British Pakistanis the possibility of marriage between cousins, also appear in these accounts, alongside the opportunities to meet marriage partners presented by the transnational social field.

Sections of this chapter draw on Ersanilli & Charsley. (2019). A good match? Education, Labour Market Position, and British South Asian transnational marriage. European Sociological Review, 35(1), 133–146. The analysis has been revised in response to additional data from new waves of the LFS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdul-Rida, C., & Baykara-Krumme, H. (2016). Staying in Turkey or marrying to Europe? Understanding transnational marriages from the country-of-origin perspective. European Sociological Review, 32(6), 702–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagguley, P., & Hussain, Y. (2016). Negotiating mobility: South Asian women and higher education. Sociology, 50(1), 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, R. (1987). The political economy of migration: Pakistan, Britain and the Middle East. In J. Eades (Ed.), Migrants, workers and the social order (pp. 17–41). London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (2010). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010 (NBER Working Paper No. 15902). National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baykara-Krumme, H. (2016). Consanguineous marriage in Turkish families in Turkey and in Western Europe. International Migration Review, 50(3), 568–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baykara-Krumme, H., & Fuß, D. (2009). Heiratsmigration nach Deutschland: determinanten der transnationalen Partnerwahl türkeistämmiger migranten. Zeitschrift Für Bevölkerungswissenschaft, 34, 135–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2011). The marriage route to migration: Of border artistes, transnational matchmaking and imported spouses. Nordic Journal of Migration Studies, 1(2), 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld, H. P. (2009). Educational assortative marriage in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 513–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonjour, S., & Kraler, A. (2015). Family migration as an integration issue? Policy perspectives and academic insights. Journal of Family Issues, 36(11), 1407–1432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carol, S., Ersanilli, E., & Wagner, M. (2014). Spousal choice among the children of Turkish and Moroccan immigrants in six European countries: Transnational spouse or co-ethnic migrant? International Migration Review, 48(2), 387–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casier, M., Heyse, P., Clycq, N., Zemni, S., & Timmerman, C. (2013). Breaking the in-group out-group: Shifting boundaries in transnational partner choice processes of individuals of Moroccan, Tunisian, Algerian, Turkish, Punjabi Sikh, Pakistani and Albanian descent in Belgium. The Sociological Review, 61(3), 460–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çelikaksoy, A., Nielsen, H. S., & Verner, M. (2006). Marriage migration: Just another case of positive assortative matching? Review of Economics of the Household, 4(3), 253–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charsley, K. (2007). Risk, trust, gender and transnational cousin marriage among British Pakistanis. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1117–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charsley, K. (2012). Transnational marriage: New perspectives from Europe and beyond. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charsley, K. (2013). Transnational Pakistani connections: Marrying ‘back home’. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charsley, K., & Bolognani, M. (2017). Being a freshie is (not) cool: Stigma, capital and disgust in British Pakistani stereotypes of new subcontinental migrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(1), 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charsley, K., & Bolognani, M. (2019). Marrying ‘in’/marrying ‘out’? Blurred boundaries in British Pakistani marriage choices. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1625131.

  • Charsley, K., & Liversage, A. (2013). Transforming polygamy: Migration, transnationalism and multiple marriages among Muslim minorities. Global Networks, 13(1), 60–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charsley, K., & Shaw, A. (2006). South Asian transnational marriages in comparative perspective. Global Networks, 6(4), 331–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constable, N. (2005). Cross-border marriage: Gender and mobility in transnational Asia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, A., & Ahmed, S. (2011). Marriage and employment patterns among UK-raised Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi women. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(6), 902–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggebø, H., & Brekke, J. P. (2018). Family migration and integration: A literature review. Nordland Research Institute. http://www.nordlandsforskning.no/publikasjoner/family-migration-and-integration-a-literature-review-article5504-152.html. Accessed 5 July 2019.

  • Ersanilli, E., & Charsley, K. (2019). A Good Match? Education, Labour Market Position, and British South Asian Transnational Marriage. European Sociological Review, 35(1), 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiadis, A., & Manning, A. (2011). Change and continuity among minority communities in Britain. Journal of Population Economics, 24(2), 541–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Ferrer, A. (2006). Who do immigrants marry? Partner choice among single immigrants in Germany. European Sociological Review, 22(2), 171–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullickson, A., & Torche, F. (2014). Patterns of racial and educational assortative mating in Brazil. Demography, 51(3), 835–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, C., Huschek, D., Milewsky, N., & Valk, H. A. G. (2012). Union formation and partner choice. In M. Crul, J. Schneider, & F. Lelie (Eds.), The European second generation compared: does the integration context matter? (pp. 225–284). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hester, M., Chantler, K., Gangoli, G., Ahmed, B., Burman, E., McCarry, M., et al. (2006). Forced marriage: The risk factors and the effect of raising the minimum age for a sponsor, and of leave to enter the UK as a spouse or fiancé (e) (Phase 1 Report to Home Office). http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/sps/migrated/documents/rk6612finalreport.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2019.

  • Home Office. (2011). Family migration: Evidence and analysis (Occasional Paper 94: 2nd ed.). London: Home Office. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/306889/occ94.pdf. Accessed 24 July 2019.

  • Huschek, D., de Valk, H. A., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2012). Partner choice patterns among the descendants of Turkish immigrants in Europe. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie, 28(3), 241–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, M. B. (2012). Danish regulations on marriage migration: Policy understandings of transnational marriage. In K. Charsley (Ed.), Transnational marriage: New perspectives from Europe and beyond. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 395–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M. (2010). Educational inequality, homogamy, and status exchange in black-white intermarriage: A comment on Rosenfeld. American Journal of Sociology, 115(4), 1252–1263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofman, E., Saharso, S., & Vacchelli, E. (2015). Gendered perspectives on integration discourses and measures. International Migration, 53(4), 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulu-Glasgow, I., & Leerkes, A. (2011). Playing hard (er) to get: The state, international couples, and the income requirement. European Journal of Migration and Law, 13(1), 95–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, P., & Glick Schiller, N. (2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. The International Migration Review, 38(3), 1002–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, J. (1999). Family-forming migration from Turkey and Morocco to Belgium: The demand for marriage partners from the countries of origin. International Migration Review, 33(3), 717–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liversage, A., & Rytter, M. (2015). A cousin marriage equals a forced marriage: Regulations, discourses and strategies of transnational consanguineous marriages in Denmark. In A. Shaw & A. E. Raz, Cousin marriages: Between tradition, genetic risk and cultural change (pp. 130–153). Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüken-Klaßen, D., & Heckmann, F. (2013). The impacts of restrictions and entitlements on the integration of family migrants: National Report Germany. https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/PR-2013-IMPACIM_National_Germany.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2019.

  • Mand, K. (2002). Place, gender and power in transnational Sikh marriages. Global Networks, 2(3), 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migration Advisory Committee. (2018). EEA migration to the UK: Final report. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/741926/Final_EEA_report.PDF.

  • Muttarak, R. (2010). Explaining trends and patterns of immigrants’ partner choice in Britain. ZfF–Zeitschrift für Familienforschung/Journal of Family Research, 22(1), 37–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niedomysl, T., Östh, J., & Van Ham, M. (2010). The globalisation of marriage fields: The Swedish case. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(7), 1119–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi, K. (2015). Beyond code-switching: young Punjabi Sikhs in Britain. In K. Jacobsen & K. Myrvold (Eds.), Young Sikhs in a global world. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi, K. (2016). Marital breakdown among British Asians. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi, K., Charsley, K., & Shaw, A. (2014). Marital instability among British Pakistanis: Transnationality, conjugalities and Islam. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(2), 261–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rait, S. K. (2005). Sikh women in England. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rytter, M. (2012). Between preferences: Marriage and mobility among Danish Pakistani youth. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18(3), 572–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachdeva, S. (1993). The primary purpose rule in British immigration law. London: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G. (2011). The Powerful Map of Transnational Families. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 1(2), 80–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, A. (2001). Kinship, cultural preference and immigration: Consanguineous marriage among British Pakistanis. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 7(2), 315–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterckx, L. (2015). Marrying ‘in’ or ‘out’: Scrutinizing the link between integration and the partner choice of young people of Turkish and Moroccan origin in the Netherlands. Journal of Family Issues, 36(11), 1550–1570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straßburger, G. (2003). Heiratsverhalten und Partnerwahl im Einwanderungskontext: Eheschließungen der zweiten Migrantengeneration türkischer Herkunft. Würzburg: Ergon-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Migration Observatory. (2014). Love and money: How immigration policy discriminates between families. https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/commentaries/love-and-money-how-immigration-policy-discriminates-between-families/. Accessed 25 July 2019.

  • Timmerman, C. (2006). Gender dynamics in the context of Turkish marriage migration: The case of Belgium. Turkish Studies, 7(1), 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, H. (2011). Regulating marriage migration into the UK: A stranger in the home. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    Katharine Charsley

  2. Bristol, UK

    Marta Bolognani

  3. Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Evelyn Ersanilli

  4. Centre on Migration, Policy and Society, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Sarah Spencer

Authors
  1. Katharine Charsley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marta Bolognani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Evelyn Ersanilli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sarah Spencer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katharine Charsley .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Charsley, K., Bolognani, M., Ersanilli, E., Spencer, S. (2020). British South Asian Transnational Marriage. In: Marriage Migration and Integration. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40252-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40252-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40251-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40252-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation