Advertisement

Understanding Integration

Chapter
  • 150 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life book series (PSFL)

Abstract

Enquiry into the impact of transnational marriage on ‘integration’ requires clarity on the nature of integration processes and on the many factors known from earlier research to impact on them. Only in this way can we identify the potential relevance of marriage with a partner from abroad among the many other factors at play. In this chapter we set out our distinct, holistic definition of integration; and a heuristic model of integration processes across structural, social, cultural and civic political domains, and in relation to identity, on which our research design and analysis is based. The model highlights the importance of ‘effectors’ that can facilitate or impede integration processes, identified in the empirical data presented in later chapters.

References

  1. Ager, A., & Strang, A. (2008). Understanding integration: A conceptual framework. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21(2), 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alba, R., & Foner, N. (2015). Strangers no more: Immigration and the challenges of integration in North America and Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alba, R., & Nee, V. (1997). Rethinking assimilation theory for a new era of immigration. International Migration Review, 31(4), 826–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ambrosini, M., & Abbatecola, E. (2004). Immigrazione e metropoli. Un confronto Europeo. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  5. Anthias, F., & Pajnic, M. (Eds.). (2014). Contesting integration, engendering migration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Charsley, K. (2013). Transnational Pakistani connections: Marrying ‘back home’. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Charsley, K., & Liversage, A. (2015). Silenced husbands: Muslim marriage migration and masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 18(4), 489–508.Google Scholar
  8. Commission on Integration and Cohesion (CIC). (2007). Our shared future. Communities and Local Government Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Cook, M. L. (2013). Is incorporation of unauthorized immigrants possible? Inclusion and contingency for non-status migrants and legal immigrants. In J. Hochschild, J. Chattopadhyay, C. Gay, & M. Jones-Correa (Eds.), Outsiders no more? Models of immigrant political incorporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cooke, T. J. (2008). Migration in a family way. Population, Space and Place, 14(4), 255–265.Google Scholar
  11. Crul, M., & Vermeulen, H. (2003). The second generation in Europe. International Migration Review, 37(4), 965–986.Google Scholar
  12. Crul, M., Schneider, J., & Lelie, F. (Eds.). (2012). The European second generation compared: Does the integration context matter? Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  13. De Haas, H. (2006). Migration, remittances and regional development in Southern Morocco. Geoforum, 37(4), 565–580.Google Scholar
  14. De Haas, H., & Fokkema, T. (2011). The effects of integration and transnational ties on international return migration intentions. Demographic Research, 25(24), 755–782.Google Scholar
  15. Decimo, F. (2005). Quando Emigrano le Donne. Percorsi e Reti Femminili Della Mobilità Transnazionale. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  16. Dustman, C., Fabbri, F., Preston, I., & Wadsworth, J. (2003). Labour market performance of immigrants in the UK labour market (Report 05/03). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  17. Entzinger, H. (2000). The dynamics of integration policies: A multidimensional model. In R. Koopmans & P. Statham (Eds.), Challenging immigration and ethnic relations politics: Comparative European perspectives (pp. 97–118). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Erdal, M. B., & Oeppen, C. (2013). Migrant balancing acts: Understanding the interactions between integration and transnationalism. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(6), 867–884.Google Scholar
  19. Favell, A. (2010). Integration and nations: the nation-state and research on immigrants in Western Europe. In M. Martiniello & J. Rath (Eds.), Selected studies in international migration and immigrant incorporation. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. (Article first published in Comparative Social Research, 22(2003), 13–42.)Google Scholar
  20. Fennema, M., & Tillie, J. (2004). Do immigrant politics matter? Ethnic civic communities and immigrant policies in Amsterdam, Liege, and Zurich. In R. Penninx, K. Krall, M. Martiniello, & S. Vertovec, (Eds.), Citizenship in European cities: Immigrants, local politics, and integration policies. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  21. Fog Olwig, K. (2011). ‘Integration’: Migrants and refugees between Scandinavian welfare societies and family relations. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(2), 179–196.Google Scholar
  22. Garbaye, R. (2004). Ethnic minority local councillors in French and British cities: Social determinants and political opportunity structures. In R. Penninx, K. Krall, M. Martiniello, & S. Vertovec (Eds.), Citizenship in European cities: Immigrants, local politics, and integration policies. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  23. Gedalof, I. (2007). Unhomely homes: Women, family and belonging in UK discourses of migration and asylum. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(1), 77–94.Google Scholar
  24. Gidley, B., & Caputo, M. L. (2013). Residential integration—Towards a sending country perspective (INTERACT Research Report 2013/04). Oxford: COMPAS; Florence: EUI.Google Scholar
  25. GLA. (2018). All of us: The mayor’s strategy for social integration. Greater London Authority. https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/communities/all-us-mayors-strategy-social-integration. Accessed 24 July 2019.
  26. Heckmann, F., & Schnapper, D. (Eds.). (2003). The integration of immigrants in European societies: National differences and trends of convergence. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.Google Scholar
  27. Heckmann, F., et al. (2006). Integration and integration policies: IMISCOE network feasibility study. Amsterdam: IMISCOE.Google Scholar
  28. Hochschild, J., Chattopadhyay, J., Gay, C., & Jones-Correa, M. (2013). Outsiders no more? Models of immigrant political incorporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson-Hanks, J. (2002). On the limits of life stages in ethnography: Toward a theory of vital conjunctures. American Anthropologist, 104(3), 865–880.Google Scholar
  30. Joppke, C. (2013). Tracks of immigrant political incorporation. In J. Hochschild, J. Chattopadhyay, C. Gay, & M. Jones-Correa (Eds.), Outsiders no more? Models of immigrant political incorporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Joppke, C., & Morawska, E. (2003). Integrating immigrants in liberal nation-states: Policies and practices. In C. Joppke & E. Morawska (Eds.), Toward assimilation and citizenship: Immigrants in liberal nation states. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Kloosterman, R., & Rath, J. (Eds.). (2003). Immigrant entrepreneurs: Venturing abroad in the age of globalisation. Oxford and New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  33. Kofman, E., Phizacklea, A., Raghuram, P., & Sales, R. (2000). Gender and international migration in Europe. London and New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  34. Koopmans, R. (2010). Trade-offs between equality and difference: Immigrant integration, multiculturalism and the welfare state in cross-national perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  35. Martinello, M. (2013). Comparisons in migration studies. Comparative Migration Studies, 1(1), 7–22.Google Scholar
  36. Martiniello, M., & Rath, J. (Eds.). (2010). Selected studies in international migration and immigrant incorporation. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Maxwell, R. (2012). Ethnic minority migrants in Britain and France: Integration trade-offs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. McDonald, S., & Elder, G. H. (2006). When does social capital matter? Non-searching for jobs across the life course. Social Forces, 85(1), 521–549.Google Scholar
  39. Migrant Rights Network. (2014). The family migration income threshold: Pricing UK workers out of a family life. London: Migrants’ Rights Network. https://migrantsrights.org.uk/blog/2017/02/23/family-migration-income-threshold-pricing-uk-workers-family-life/. Accessed 25 July 2019.
  40. Modood, T. (2012). Post immigration ‘difference’ and integration. London: British Academy. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/publications/post-immigration-difference-and-integration-case-muslims-western-europe. Accessed 25 July 2019.
  41. Modood, T., Berthoud, R., Lakey, J., Nazroo, J., Smith, P., Virdee, S., & Beishon, S., (1997). Ethnic minorities in Britain: Diversity and disadvantage. London: Policy Studies Institute. http://www.psi.org.uk/pdf/Ethnic%20Minorities%20In%20Britain_small_file.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2019.
  42. Oliver, C. (2013). The impact of restrictions and entitlements on the integration of family migrants. Oxford: COMPAS. https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/PR-2013-IMPACIM_Comparative.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2019.
  43. Özdemir, C., Özcan, V., Uslucan, H. H., Uslucan, Ş., & Erdem, E. (2004). Die Situation der türkischstämmigen Bevölkerung in Deutschland. Gutachten im Auftrag des Sachverständigenrates für Zuwanderung und Integration. Berlin: BAMF.Google Scholar
  44. Penninx, R., & Garcés-Mascareñas, B. (2016). The concept of integration as an analytical tool and as a policy concept. In B. Garcés-Mascareñas & R. Penninx (Eds.), Integration processes and policies in Europe: Contexts, levels and actors (pp. 11–29). Heidelberg: Springer. http://www.springer.com/us/book/9783319216737.
  45. Penninx, R., & Martiniello, M. (2004). Integration processes and policies: State of the art and lessons. In R. Penninx, K. Kraal, M. Martiniello, & S. Vertovec (Eds.), Citizenship in European cities: Immigrants, local politics and integration policies. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  46. Phillimore, J. (2012). Implementing integration in the UK: Lessons for integration theory, policy and practice. Policy & Politics, 40(4), 525–545.Google Scholar
  47. Platts-Fowler, D., & Robinson, D. (2015). A place for integration: Refugee experiences in two English cities. Population, Space and Place, 21(5), 476–491.Google Scholar
  48. Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants among post-1965 immigrant youth. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 530(1), 74–96.Google Scholar
  49. Portes, A., Fernandez-Kelly, P., & Haller, W. (2005). Segmented assimilation on the ground: The new second generation in early adulthood. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(6), 1000–1040.Google Scholar
  50. Robinson, D., & Reeve, K. (2006). Neighbourhood experiences of new immigration. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  51. Rudiger, A., & Spencer, S. (2003, January). Social integration of migrants and ethnic minorities: Policies to combat discrimination. Paper Presented at OECD/European Commission Conference, The Economic and Social Aspects of Migration. http://www.oecd.org/migration/mig/15516956.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2019.
  52. Rytter, M. (2010). ‘The family of Denmark’ and ‘the Aliens’: Kinship images in Danish integration politics. Ethnos, 75(3), 301–322.Google Scholar
  53. Rytter, M. (2012). Between preferences: Marriage and mobility among Danish Pakistani youth. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18(3), 572–590.Google Scholar
  54. Rytter, M. (2018). Writing against integration: Danish imaginaries of culture, race and belonging. Ethnos, 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2018.1458745.
  55. Schinkel, W. (2011). The nationalization of desire: Transnational marriage in Dutch culturist integration discourse. Focaal—Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 2011(59), 99–106.Google Scholar
  56. Schinkel, W. (2018). Against ‘immigrant integration’: For an end to neocolonial knowledge production. Comparative migration studies, 6(1), 31.Google Scholar
  57. Schmidt, G. (2011). Law and identity: Transnational arranged marriages and the boundaries of Danishness. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(2), 257–275.Google Scholar
  58. Schmidtke, O. (2014). Beyond national models? Governing migration and integration at the regional and local levels in Canada and Germany. Comparative Migration Studies, 1(1), 77–99.Google Scholar
  59. Snel, E., Engbersen, G., & Leerkes, A. (2006). Transnational involvement and social integration. Global Networks, 6(3), 285–308.Google Scholar
  60. Spencer, S. (2011). The migration debate. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  61. Spencer, S., & Charsley, K. (2016). Conceptualising integration: A framework for empirical research, taking marriage migration as a case study. Comparative Migration Studies, 4(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  62. Spencer, S., & Cooper, B. (2006). Social integration of migrants in Europe: A review of the European literature 2000–2006. COMPAS. https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/2006/er-2006-integration_europe_literature_review_oecd/. Accessed 25 July 2019.
  63. Spencer, S., Ruhs, M., Anderson, B., & Rogaly, B. (2007). Migrants’ lives beyond the workplace. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  64. Van Tubergen, F., Maas, I., & Flap, H. (2004). The economic incorporation of immigrants in 18 Western societies: Origin, destination, and community effects. American Sociological Review, 69(5), 704–727.Google Scholar
  65. Vermeulen, F. (2005). Organisational patterns: Surinamese and Turkish associations in Amsterdam, 1960–1990. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 3(5), 951–973.Google Scholar
  66. Vislie, L. (2003). From integration to inclusion: Focusing global trends and changes in the western European societies. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 18(1), 17–35.Google Scholar
  67. Waters, M. C., & Jiminez, T. (2005). Assessing immigrant assimilation: New empirical and theoretical challenges. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 105–125.Google Scholar
  68. Wellman, B., Wong, R. Y. L., Tindall, D., & Nazer, N. (1997). A decade of network change: Turnover, persistence and stability in personal communities. Social Networks, 19(1), 27–50.Google Scholar
  69. Wieviorka, M. (2011, February 23). Cessons d’en appeler à l’intégration! Paper presented to the conference on ‘Immigration and Integration in Europe’, Grenoble. http://www.pacte.cnrs.fr/IMG/pdf_WIEVIORKA_Michel.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2019.
  70. Wimmer, A., & Glick Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: National-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301–334.Google Scholar
  71. Yuval-Davis, N. (1993). Gender and nation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 16(4), 621–632.Google Scholar
  72. Zetter, R., Griffiths, D., Sigona, N., & Hauser, M. (2003). A survey of policy and practice related to refugee integration in the EU (Final Report to European Refugee Fund Community Actions). Oxford: Oxford Brookes University. file:///C:/Users/lm13656/Downloads/Survey_on_policy_and_practice.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2019.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Sociology, Politics and International StudiesUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.BristolUK
  3. 3.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Centre on Migration, Policy and SocietyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations