Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Peacemaking, Peacekeeping, and Peacebuilding

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Luc Reychler: A Pioneer in Sustainable Peacebuilding Architecture

Part of the book series: Pioneers in Arts, Humanities, Science, Engineering, Practice ((PAHSEP,volume 24))

Abstract

Peacemaking, peacekeeping, and peacebuilding may not have the punch and the means of national security, but they are receiving an increasing amount of attention in education, research, and politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This text was first published as: Reychler, L. (2010). Peacemaking, Peacekeeping, and Peacebuilding. In R. A. Denemark (Ed.), The International Studies Encyclopedia (pp. 5604–5626). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Reprinted with permission.

  2. 2.

    This contribution is based on many experiences, discussions, and research over the years. It is impossible to acknowledge and thank all those who have influenced my thinking on sustainable peacebuilding. Let me express my appreciation for the valuable and timely help from two doctoral students, Julianne Funk and Nikos Manaras.

  3. 3.

    Freedom House, International Institute for Electoral Democracy and Electoral Assistance (EDEA). See at: https://freedomhouse.org/report-types/freedom-world.

References

  • Alger, C. (2007). Peace Studies as a Transdisciplinary Project. In C. Webel & J. Galtung (Eds.), Handbook of Peace and, Conflict Studies (pp. 299–318). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. (1999). Do No Harm: How Aid Can Support Peace or War. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augsburger, D. W. (1992). Conflict Mediation across Cultures: Pathways and Patterns. Louisville: John Knox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azar, E. (1990). The Management of Protracted Social Conflict: Theory and Cases. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, J., & Hailey, V. H. (1999). Exploring Strategic Change. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, K., & Lyytikainen, M. (2008). Improving EU Responses to Gender and Peace Building: Priority Action Areas for the European Commission. London: International Alert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitch, J. (Ed.). (1996). Resolving International Conflicts: The Theory and Practice of Mediation. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdal, M., & Economides, S. (Eds.). (2007). United Nations Interventionism 1991–2004. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. (2007). Theory of World Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, E. (1991). The Challenge of Imaging Peace in Wartime. Futures 23(5), 528–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1978). Stable Peace. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1989). Three Faces of Power. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutros-Ghali, B. (1992). An Agenda for Peace. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., & Rosecrance, R. (1999). The Costs of Conflict: Prevention and Cure in the Global Arena. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, G., & Burgess, H. (n.d.). The Beyond Intractability Knowledge Base Project. Retrieved from https://www.beyondintractability.org/, accessed March 2009.

  • Burton, J. (1969). Conflict and Communication: The Use of Controlled Communication in International Relations. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. W. (1987). Resolving Deep Rooted Conflict: A Handbook. Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, R. (2005). International Governance of War-Torn Territories: Rule and Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2002). Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Task Framework.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesterman, S. (2004). You, The People: The United Nations, Transitional Administration, and State-Building. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, J. (1999). Peace-Maintenance: The Evolution of International Political Authority. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Greed and Grievance in Civil War. Oxford Economic Papers, 56, 563–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., & Sambanis, N. (2005). Understanding Civil War: Evidence and Analysis (Africa). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., Elliott, V. L., Hegre, H., Hoeffler, A., Reynal-Querol, M., & Sambanis, N. (2003). Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, D., & Whitney, D. (1999). Appreciative Inquiry. San Francisco: Berret-Koeller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousens, E., Kumar, C., & Wermester, K. (Eds.). (2000). Peacebuilding as Politics: Cultivating Peace in Fragile Societies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, C. A., Hampson, F. O., & Aall, P. (2004). Taming Intractable Conflicts: Mediation in the Hardest Cases. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curie, A. (1971). Making Peace. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, D. (2008a). Why So Few Troops from among So Many? In D. Daniel, P. Taft, & S. Wiharta (Eds.), Peace Operations: Trends, Progress and Prospects (pp. 47–62). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, D. (2008b). Conclusion. In D. Daniel, P. Taft, and S. Wiharta (Eds.), Peace Operations: Trends, Progress and Prospects (pp. 221–232). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby, J., and Mac Ginty, R. (Eds.). (2008). Contemporary Peacemaking: Conflict, Peace Processes and Post-War Reconstruction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debiel, T., & Terlinden, U. (2005). Promoting Good Governance in Post-Conflict Societies (Discussion paper). Eschborn: Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Coning, C. (2008). Coherence, and Coordination in United Nations Peacebuilding: A Norwegian Perspective. Oslo: NUPI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, D. (1957). Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L., & McDonald, J. W. (1996). Multi-Track Diplomacy: A System’s Approach to Peace. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, J., Jones, S. G., Crane, K., Rathmell, A., Steele, B., Teltschik, R., & Timilsina, A. (2005). The UN’s Role in Nation-Building: From the Congo to Iraq. Santa Monica: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, J., Jones, S. G., Crane, K, & DeGrasse, B. (2007). The Beginner’s Guide to Nation-Building. Santa Monica: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, J., McGinn, J. G., Crane, K, Jones, S. G., Lai, R., Rathmell, A., Swanger, R., & Timilsina, A. (2003) America’s Role in Nation-Building: From Germany to Iraq. Santa Monica: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donini, A. (1996). The Policies of Mercy: UN Coordination in Afghanistan, Mozambique, and Rwanda (Occasional Paper No. 22). Providence, RI: Thomas J. Watson Institute for International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, M. W. (2002). Strategy and Transitional Authority. In S.J. Stedman, D. Rothchild, & E.M. Cousens (Eds.), Ending Civil Wars: The Implementation of Peace Agreements (pp. 71–88). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, M. (2001). Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, S., Carden, F., & Smutylo, T. (2001). Outcome Mapping: Building Learning and Reflection into Development Programs. Ottawa: IDRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbe, S. (2007). HIV/AIDS and Security. In A. Collins (Ed.), Contemporary Security Studies (pp. 331–345). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission External Relations Directorate-General. (2008). From Early Warning to Early Action? Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission. (1996). The European Union and the Issue of Conflicts in Africa: Peace-building, Conflict Prevention and Beyond. SEC (96)332 (6 March).

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. (1999). Predatory Globalization: A Critique. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, T. (2007). Humanitarian Intervention and Peace Operations. In J. Baylis, J. Wirtz, C.S. Gray, & Cohen, E. (Eds.), Strategy in the Contemporary World: Introduction to Strategic Studies (pp. 286–308). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fein, H. (1993). Genocide: A Sociological Perspective. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, D., Nolte, W., & Oberg, J. (1989). Winning Peace: Strategies and Ethics for a Nuclear-Free World. London: Crane Russak.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to Yes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzduff, M. (2006). Core Competences for Graduate Programs in Coexistence and Conflict Work – Can We Agree? (Woodrow Wilson Center Leadership Notes Series No. 1). Waltham: Brandeis University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friis, K., & Jarmyr, P. (2008). Comprehensive Approach: Challenges and Opportunities in Complex Crisis Management. Oslo: NUPI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1981). Social Cosmology and the Concept of Peace, Journal of Peace Research, 18(2), 183–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraldo, J., & Trinkunas, H. (2006). Transnational Crime. In A. Collins (Ed.), Contemporary Security Studies (pp. 346–366). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R., & Harff, B. (1994). Early Warning of Communal Conflicts and Humanitarian Crises. Journal of Ethno-Development (Special Issue), 4(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, F. O. (1996). Nurturing Peace: Why Peace Settlements Succeed or Fail. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. (1992). An Integrative Framework for Strategy Making Processes. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 327–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heldt, B. (2008). Trends from 1948 to 2005: How to View the Relation between the United Nations and Non-UN Entities. In D. Daniel, P. Taft, & S. Wiharta (Eds.), Peace Operations: Trends, Progress and Prospects (pp. 9–26). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoglund, K. (2008). Peace Negotiations in the Shadow of Violence. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingelstam, M. (2001). Motivation and Qualifications, interviewed by K. Kruhonja. In L. Reychler & T. Paffenholz (Eds.), Peace Building: A Field Guide (pp. 16–20). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, H. W. (2005). Peace Building in Postconflict Societies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. (2002). The Challenges of Strategic Coordination. In S.J. Stedman, D. Rothchild, & E.M. Cousens (Eds.), Ending Civil Wars: The Implementation of Peace Agreements (pp. 89–115). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B., & Cherif, F. (2003). Evolving Models of Peacekeeping: Policy Implication and Responses (External Study United Nations Best Practices Section).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A., & Schout, A. (2006). The Coordination of the European Union: Exploring Capacities of Networked Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, P. (2007). Human Security. In A. Collins (Ed.), Contemporary Security Studies (pp. 91–108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesberg, L., Northrup, A., & Thorson, S. J. (Eds.). (1989). Intractable Conflicts and their Transformation. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambourne, W. (2004a, March). Challenging the Hegemonic Discourse of Peacebuilding Theory and Practice. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambourne, W. (2004b). Post-Conflict Peacebuilding: Meeting Human Needs for Justice and Reconciliation. Peace, Conflict and Development, 4, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Large, J. (1998). The War Next Door: A Study of Second-Track Intervention during the War in Ex-Yugoslavia. Stroud: Hawthorn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindner, E. (2006). Making Enemies and Humiliation in International Conflicts. London: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindner, E. (2009). Emotion and Conflict: How Human Rights Can Dignify Emotion and Help Us Wage Good. London: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llamazares, M. (2005). Post-War Peacebuilding Reviewed: A Critical Exploration of Generic Approaches to Post-War Reconstruction (Centre for Conflict Resolution Working Paper No. 14). Bradford: University of Bradford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, M., & Mehler, A. (1999). Peace-Building and Conflict Prevention in Developing Countries: A Practical Guide. Brussels: CPN Guidebook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R. (2006). No War, No Peace: The Rejuvenation of Stalled Peace Processes and Peace Accords. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacQueen, N. (2006). Peacekeeping and the International System. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. D., & Snyder, J. (1995). Democratization and the Danger of War. International Security, 20(1), 5–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marten, K. Z. (2004). Enforcing the Peace: Learning from the Imperial Past. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, D. T., & Meernik, J.D. (Eds.). (2006). Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding in Post-War Societies: Sustaining the Peace. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. J., & Walt, S. (2006). The Israel Lobby. London Review of Books, 28(6), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minear, L. (2002). The Humanitarian Enterprise: Dilemmas and Discoveries. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C., & Banks, M. (1996). Handbook of Conflict Resolution: The Analytical Problem-Solving Approach. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moisi, D. (2008). La Geopolitique de Temotion. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullenbach, M. (2005). Deciding to Keep Peace: An Analysis of International Influences of the Establishment of Third Party Peacekeeping Mission. International Studies Quarterly, 49(3), 529–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murnighan, J. K., & Mowen, J. C. (2002). The Art of High Stakes Decision Making: Tough Calls in a Speed Driven World. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD). (2005). African Post-Conflict Reconstruction Policy Framework. Retrieved from http://www.nepad.org/2005/aprmforum/PCRPolicyFramework_en.pdf, accessed March 2009.

  • Nordstrom, C. (2004). The Shadows of War: Violence, Power, and International Profiteering in the Twenty-First Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD/DAC. (2007). Encouraging Effective Evaluation of Conflict Prevention and Peace Building Activities: Toward DAC Guidance. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, R. (Ed.). (2004). Winning the Peace: An American Strategy for Post-Conflict Reconstruction. Washington, DC: CSIS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, T., & Travers, P. (2007). Peacebuilding while Peacemaking: The Merits of a 3D Approach. Paper presented at the 48th International Studies Association Convention, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paffenholz, T., & Reychler, L. (2007). Aid for Peace: A Guide to Planning and Evaluation for Conflict Zones. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. (1997). Peace Building and the Limits of Liberal Internationalism. International Security, 22(2), 54–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. (2004). At War’s End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, S., & Brown, K. (2007). Greater than the Sum of its Parts: Assessing “Whole of Government” Approaches to Fragile States. New York: International Peace Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrigo, S., & Pearce, J. (2005). European Doctoral Enhancement in Peace and Conflict Studies Qualification Framework (Internal Discussion Paper). Bilbao: University of Deusto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picciotto, R. (2005). Fostering Development in a Global Economy: A Whole Government Perspective. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, M. (2000). Regeneration of War-Torn Societies. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramcharan, B. G. (2008). Preventive Diplomacy at the UN. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T., & Miall, H. (2006). Contemporary Conflict Resolution. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiman, H. (1992). Informal Mediation by the Scholar/Practitioner. In J. Bercovitch & J. Rubin (Eds.), Mediation in International Relations: Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management (pp. 64–95). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reychler, L. (2004). Peace Architecture: The Prevention of Violence. In A. H. Eagly, R. M. Baron, V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Group Identity and Social Conflict: Theory, Application, and Practice (pp. 133–146). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reychler, L. (2009). Sustainable Peace Building. In N. Young (Ed.), The Oxford International Encyclopedia of Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reychler, L., & Carmans, J. (2006). Violence Prevention and Peace Building: A Research Agenda (Cahiers of the Centre of Peace Research and Strategic Studies No. 74). Leuven: Centre of Peace Research and Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reychler, L., & Langer, A. (2006). Researching Peace Building Architecture (Cahiers of the Centre for Peace Research and Strategic Studies No. 75). Leuven: Centre for Peace Research and Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reychler, L., & Stellamans, A. (2005) Researching Peace Building Leadership (Cahiers of the Centre for Peace Research and Strategic Studies No. 71). Leuven: Centre for Peace Research and Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reychler, L., Renckens, S., Coppens, K., & Manaras, N. (2008). A Codebook for Evaluating Peace Agreements (Cahiers of the Centre for Peace Research and Strategic Studies No. 83). Leuven: Centre for Peace Research and Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricigliano, R. (2003). Networks of Effective Action: Implementing an Integrated Approach to Peacebuilding, Security Dialogue, 34(4), 445–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J. (1992). From Confrontation to Cooperation: Resolving Ethnic and Regional Conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, R. L. (Ed.). (1999). After the Peace: Resistance and Reconciliation. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, S. (2007). The Transformation of Violent Intercommunal Conflict. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, C., Abu-Nimer, M., Liebler, C., & Whitney, D. (2003). Positive Approaches to Peace Building. Washington, DC: Pact.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel, A., & Ehrhart, H. G. (2005). Security Sector Reform and Post-Conflict Peacebuilding. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., & Smith, B. (1994). The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (2004). Towards a Strategic Framework for Peacebuilding: Getting their Act Together (Evaluation Report Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs). Oslo: PRIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, M., & Robinson, G. (Eds.). (2001). Researching Violently Divided Societies. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman, S. (1997). Spoiler Problems in Peace Processes. International Security, 22(2), 5–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman, S. J. (2001). International Implementation of Peace Agreements in Civil Wars: Findings from a Study of Sixteen Cases. In C. A. Crocker, F. O. Hampson, & P. R. Aall (Eds.), Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict (pp. 737–752). Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman, S. J., Rothchild, D., & Cousens, E. M. (Eds.). (2002). Ending Civil Wars: The Implementation of Peace Agreements. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, B. H. (2004). Collective Preventive Diplomacy: A Study in International Conflict Management. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, M., & Kehler, N. (2004, May). Rethinking Humanitarian Assistance Coordination. Paper presented at the International Society for Third Sector Research Sixth International Conference, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, F. (Ed.). (2008). Horizontal Inequalities and Conflict: Understanding Group Violence in Multiethnic Societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, A., Szayna, T., & Winnefeld, J. (1997). Anticipating Ethnic Conflict. Santa Monica: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2006). Delivering as One: Report of the UN Secretary General’s High Level Panel on Systemwide Coherence. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of State. (2005). Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Essential Tasks. Office for the Coordinator of Reconstruction and Stabilization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkoren, W. (2008). The Owl and the Dove: Knowledge Strategies to Improve the Peace Building Practice of Local Non-Governmental Organizations (Doctoral Dissertation). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallensteen, P. (2002). Understanding Conflict Resolution: War, Peace and the Global System. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, B. F. (2002). Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, P. (2000a). Peace Support under Fire: Lessons from Sierra Leone (ISIS Briefing on Humanitarian Intervention No. 2). London: International Security Information Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, P. (2000b). Sharpening the Weapons of Peace: Peace Support Operations and Complex Emergencies. International Peacekeeping, 7(1), 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wils, O., Hopp, U., Ropers, N., Vimalarajah, L., & Zunzer, W. (2006). The Systemic Approach to Conflict Transformation. Berlin: Berghof Foundation for Peace Support.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahar, M. J. (2008). Reframing the Spoiler Debate in Peace Process. In J. Darby and R. Mac Ginty (Eds.), Contemporary Peacemaking: Conflict, Peace Processes and Post-War Reconstruction (pp. 159–177). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, W. (1995). Elusive Peace: Negotiating an End to Civil Wars. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

Online Resources

  • Conciliation Resources (CR) is an international nongovernmental organization which publishes Accord, an international review of peace initiatives, and provides many links to other relevant organizations. At http://www.c-r.org/index.php, accessed July 2009.

  • European Peacebuilding Liaison Office (EPLO) is the platform of European NGOs, networks of NGOs, and think-tanks active in the field of peacebuilding, who share an interest in promoting sustainable peacebuilding policies among decision-makers in the European Union. At http://www.eplo.org/, accessed July 2009.

  • INCORE (International Conflict Research) is a joint project of the United Nations University and the University of Ulster. Its Peace Agreement Database lists over 640 documents in over 85 jurisdictions which can be termed “peace agreements.” At http://www.peaceagreements.ulster.ac.uk/, accessed July 2009.

  • International Crisis Group (ICG) is recognized as the leading independent source of analysis and advice to governments and international organization. It publishes reports on conflicts and a crisis watch and provides databases and resources. Available at https://www.crisisgroup.org/, accessed on 20 March 2020.

  • OECD: DAC Network on Conflict, Peace and Development Co-operation (CPDC) is a unique decision-making forum which brings together governments and international organizations in order to support peacebuilding. It has produced “Monitoring principles for good international engagement in fragile states” and many publications about related key concepts, findings and lessons. At http://www.oecd.Org/department/0,3355,en_2649_33693550_l_l_l_l_L00.html, accessed July 2009.

  • The Stockholm Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) has the reputation of publishing objective data and analyses about everything related to arms, arms expenditures, arms control, and peace operations. Each year it produces a SIPRI yearbook on armaments, disarmament, and international security. Available at https://www.sipri.org/, accessed on 20 March 2020.

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP). Its crisis prevention and crisis recovery unit provides a rich set of reports on issues such as DDR, economic recovery, rule of law, small arms, state building, and gender equality. UNDP also produces human development reports. Available at http://www.hdr.undp.org/, accessed July 2009.

  • UN Peacebuilding Commission provides UN documents and resolutions on peacemaking and peacebuilding. Available at https://www.un.org/peacebuilding/commission, accessed on 20 March 2020.

  • United States Institute for Peace (USIP) provides high quality books, issue papers, and practi-tioners’ toolkits on the prevention and resolution of violent international conflicts and on peacebuilding. At http://www.usip.org, accessed July 2009.

  • World Bank: Conflict Prevention and Reconstruction. The aim of the Conflict Analysis Framework (CAF) is to enhance the conflict sensitivity and conflict prevention potential of the World Bank. CAF analyses key factors influencing conflict, focusing on six areas: social and ethnic relations; governance and political institutions; human rights and security; economic structure and performance; environment and natural resources; and external factors.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Social Sciences, Leuven International and European Studies, Centre for Research on Peace and Development (CRPD), University of Leuven/KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Luc Reychler & Arnim Langer

Authors
  1. Luc Reychler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arnim Langer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luc Reychler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Social Sciences, Leuven International and European Studies, Centre for Research on Peace and Development (CRPD), University of Leuven/KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Luc Reychler

  2. Faculty of Social Sciences, Leuven International and European Studies, Centre for Research on Peace and Development (CRPD), University of Leuven/KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Arnim Langer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Reychler, L., Langer, A. (2020). Peacemaking, Peacekeeping, and Peacebuilding. In: Reychler, L., Langer, A. (eds) Luc Reychler: A Pioneer in Sustainable Peacebuilding Architecture. Pioneers in Arts, Humanities, Science, Engineering, Practice, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40208-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40208-2_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40207-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40208-2

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation