Abstract
A reconstruction of historical and modern building objects is often based on the fact that the as-built documentation is not accurate, is not actual or even does not exist. At present, technology of terrestrial laser scanning and aerial photogrammetry using drones can serve as effective and progressive tools in the area of 3D spatial digitization of buildings and their geometric dimensions. Both technologies offer the same result called point cloud—detailed 3D representation of building in a digital environment. One of advantage is connectivity of both results into one result. Terrestrial laser scanner is a great tool for measuring existing buildings, but what is not visible for him cannot be scanned. Scanning of some surfaces of roof structures or metallic surfaces can be problem for terrestrial laser scanner and for person’s safety handling with it. In this case, drone can serve a complementary technology for laser scanning or can replace laser scanning completely. The aim of this paper is to find out the advantages and disadvantages of these two technologies through a real example. For scanning, the building of Faculty of Civil Engineering, located in Kosice, Slovakia, was chosen.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adán, A., Quintana, B., Prieto, S.A., Bosché, F.: Scan-to-BIM for ‘secondary’ building components. Adv. Eng. Informat. 37, 119–138 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2018.05.001
Muralikrishnan, B., Rachakonda, P., Lee, V., Shilling, M., Sawyer, D., Cheok, G., Cournoyer, L.: Relative range error evaluation of terrestrial laser scanners using a plate, a sphere, and a novel dual-sphere-plate target. Measurement. 111, 60–68 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.07.027
Pejić, M., Ogrizović, V., Božić, B., Milovanović, B., Marošan, S.: A simplified procedure of metrological testing of the terrestrial laser scanners. Measurement. 53, 260–269 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.03.024
Wang, C., Cho, Y.K.: Performance evaluation of automatically generated BIM from laser scanner data for sustainability analyses. Proc. Eng. 118, 918–925 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.531
Shini, R.Z., Sacks, R., Ma, L., Filin, S.: Towards generation of as-damaged BIM models using laser scanning and as-built BIM First estimate of as-damaged locations of reinforced concrete frame members in masonry infill structures. ISPRS J. Photogram. Rem. Sens. 126, 168–179 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2016.04.001
Tang, P., Huber, D., Akinci, B., Lipman, R., Lytle, A.: Automatic reconstruction of as-built building information models from laser-scanned point clouds: a review of related techniques. Auto. Constr. 19(7), 829–843 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.06.007
Bosché, F., Guillemet, A., Turkan, Y., Haas, C., Haas, R.: Tracking the built status of MEP works: assessing the value of a scan-vs-BIM system. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 28(4), 1 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000343
Belsky, M., Sacks, R., Brilakis, I.: Semantic enrichment for building information modelling. Comput. Aided Civ. Inf. Eng. 31(4), 261 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12128
Kim, C., Son, H.: Automated construction progress measurement using a 4D building information model and 3D data. Auto. Constr. 31, 75–82 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.041
Bosche, F., Ahmed, M., Turkan, Y., Haas, C.T., Haas, R.: Automated retrieval of 3D CAD model objects in construction range images. Auto. Constr. 17(4), 499–512 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2007.09.001
Bosche, F.: Automated recognition of 3D CAD model objects in laser scans and calculation of as-built dimensions for dimensional compliance control in construction. Adv. Eng. Informat. 24, 107–118 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2009.08.006
Bosche, F., Ahmed, M., Turkan, Y., Haas, C.T., Haas, R.: The value of integrating Scan-to-BIM and Scan-vs-BIM techniques for construction monitoring using laser scanning and BIM: the case of cylindrical MEP components. Auto. Constr. 49(B), 201–213 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.014
Shahbazi, M., Menard, P., Sohn, G., Theau, J.: Unmanned aerial image dataset ready for 3D reconstruction. Data Brief. 25, 103962 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.103962
Pecho, P., Magdolenova, P., Bugaj, M.: Unmanned aerial vehicle technology in the process of early fire localization of buildings. Transport. Res. Proc. 40, 461–468 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.067
Zhong, X., Peng, X., Yan, S., Shen, M., Zhai, Y.: Assessment of the feasibility of detecting concrete cracks in images acquired by unmanned aerial vehicles. Auto. Constr. 89, 49–57 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.01.005
Corrigan, F.: Introduction to UAV Photogrammetry and Lidar Mapping Basics. DroneZon (2018). Available from https://www.dronezon.com/learn-about-drones-quadcopters/introduction-to-uav-photogrammetry-and-lidar-mapping-basics/
Eisenbeiss, H., Zhang, L.: Comparison of DSMS generated from mini UAV imagery and terrestrial laser scanner in a cultural heritage application. In: ISPRS Commission V Symposium Image Engineering and Vision Metrology, pp. 1–7 (2006)
Gruszczyński, W., Matwij, W., Ćwiąkała, P.: Comparison of low-altitude UAV photogrammetry with terrestrial laser scanning as data-source methods for terrain covered in low vegetation. ISPRS J. Photogram. Rem. Sens. 126, 168–179 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.02.015
Altuntas, C.: Integration of point clouds originated from laser scanner and photogrammetric images for visualization of complex details of historical buildings. Int. Arch. Photogram. Rem. Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XL-5(W4), 431–435 (2015). Available from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/INTEGRATION-OF-POINT-CLOUDS-ORIGINATED-FROM-LASER-Altuntas/3a5a22af37ddc29da529aabce73bf4cf27804591/
Pejic, P., Krasic, S.: Modern methods of three-dimensional presentations of the building heritage. In: IV International Symposium for Students of Doctoral Studies in the Fields of Civil Engineering, pp. 111–119 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W7-207-2015
Saaty, H., et al.: Group Decision Making: Drawing Out and Reconciling Differences. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA (2008)
Goepel, K.D.: Implementation of an online software tool for the analytic hierarchy process (AHP-OS). Int. J. Anal. Hierar. Proc. 10(3), 469–487 (2018). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v10i3.590
Cherney, D., Denton, T., Rohit, T., Waldron, A.: Linear Algebra (2013). Available from https://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~linear/linear-guest.pdf
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract no. APVV-17-0549.
The paper presents a partial research result of project VEGA 1/0828/17 “Research and application of knowledge-based systems for modeling cost and economic parameters in Building Information Modeling”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krajníková, K., Smetanková, J., Mésároš, P., Behún, M. (2020). Different Approaches in Building Digitization Through the Use of 3D Laser Scanning. In: Knapcikova, L., Balog, M., Peraković, D., Periša, M. (eds) New Approaches in Management of Smart Manufacturing Systems. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40176-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40176-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40175-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40176-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)