Abstract
Chapter 4 ‘Constituents’ is the first analytic/presentation of data chapter, which sketches out some preliminary demographic features of THE advocates and advocacy groupings encountered while moving across locations in the field. This chapter outlines some common social variables apparently common among those I met in spaces associated with THEA, as well as accounts offered by actors regarding the levels/forms of enhancement advocacy they had encountered themselves. Finally, it examines the socially constructed boundaries THE advocates evoked to limit or restrict access to groups organised around this objective.
“The overman… Who has organized the chaos of his passions, given style to his character, and become creative. Aware of life’s terrors, he affirms life without resentment.”
—Friedrich Nietzsche Thus Spoke Zarathustra [1885]
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). The Extreme Male Brain Theory of Autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 248–254.
Davis, E. (1998). TechGnosis: Myth, Magic and Mysticism in the Age of Information. San Francisco: Harmony Books.
Fox, C. (2001). Technogenarians: The Pioneers of Pervasive Computing Aren’t Getting Any Younger, Wired, (Issue 9.11, November). [Online]. Retrieved March 21, 2017, from https://www.wired.com/2001/11/aging/.
Fuller, S. (2010). Science: The Art of Living. Durham: Acumen.
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits. American Psychologist., 48, 26–34.
Hardey, M. (1999). Doctor in the House: The Internet as a Source of Lay Health Knowledge and The Challenge to Expertise. Sociology of Health and Illness, 21(6), 820–835.
Hoffer, E. (2002). The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements. Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
Hughes, J. (2003). Report on the 2003 Interests and Beliefs Survey of the Members of the World Transhumanist Association. [Online]. Retrieved April 7, 2017, from https://ieet.org/archive/WTASurvey03Report.pdf.
Hughes, J. (2005). Report on the 2005 Interests and Beliefs Survey of the Members of the World Transhumanist Association. [Online]. Retrieved July 14, 2013, from http://www.humanityplus.org/index.php/WTA/more/.
Hughes, J. (2008) Report on the 2007 Interests and Beliefs Survey of the Members of the World Transhumanist Association. [Online]. Retrieved July 14, 2013, from http://www.humanityplus.org/index.php/WTA/more/2007survey/.
Hughes, J. (2015). Politics. In R. Ranisch & S. L. Sorgner (Eds.), Post- and Transhumanism: An Introduction. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH.
Istvan, Z. (2016). Can Transhumanism Overcome a Widespread Deathist Culture? The Huffington Post. (May 26). [Online]. Retrieved March 27, 2017, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/zoltan-istvan/can-transhumanism-overcom_b_7433108.html.
Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQueen, K. M., Guest, G., Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector’s Field Guide. Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International.
More, M. (2013). The Philosophy of Transhumanism. In M. More & N. Vita-More (Eds.), The Transhumanist Reader (Chapter 1). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Dellusion. London: Penguin Books.
Turkle, S. (1984). The Second Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the Screen. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
MacFarlane, J.M. (2020). Constituents. In: Transhumanism as a New Social Movement. Palgrave Studies in the Future of Humanity and its Successors. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40090-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40090-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40089-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40090-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)