Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Importance of Hinterland Transport Network Structures for Seaport Container Terminals: An Update

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Terminal Planning

Part of the book series: Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series ((ORCS))

Abstract

In recent decades, the intermodal container transport has emerged more and more as the basis for a globalized economy. This results in appropriate seaport container terminal requirements with terminals serving as transshipment nodes and as an important interface between different transport modes. However, the operational performance in such network nodes is only one fundamental aspect. Especially the capacities of inbound and outbound flows, i.e., the deep-sea and the hinterland transport, play an essential role, in particular because hinterland transport is a typical bottleneck. To solve these problems, different concepts are presented including a dislocation of the terminal structures as well as an increased involvement of rail freight transport. However, some crucial problems and questions should be investigated. Although after the economic crisis in 2009 the international container transport increased again, it is much lower than predicted in previous years. Furthermore, there are some uncertainties that need to be analyzed with regard to future developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aerts G, Grage T, Dooms M, Haezendonck E (2014) Public-private partnerships for the provision of port infrastructure: an explorative multi-actor perspective on critical success factors. Asian J Ship Logist 30(3):273–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Alicke K (2002) Modelling and optimization of the intermodal terminal mega hub. OR Spect 24:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA) (2005) AAPA World port rankings 2005. https://web.archive.org/web/20070927223354/ http://aapa.files.cms-plus.com/Statistics/WORLD%20PORT%20RANKINGS%202005.xls. Accessed 25 June 2019

  • Aperte XG, Baird AJ (2013) Motorways of the sea policy in Europe. Marit Policy Manag 40(1):10–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby A (2016) From global to local: reshoring for sustainability. Oper Manag Res 9(3):75–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Attaran M (2017) The rise of 3-D printing: the advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing. Bus Horiz 60(5):677–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengler K, Dietmayer K, Farber B, Maurer M, Stiller C, Winner H (2014) Three decades of driver assistance systems: review and future perspectives. IEEE Intell Transp Syst Mag 6(4):6–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ner A, Siemsen E (2017) Decentralization and localization of production: the organizational and economic consequences of additive manufacturing (3D printing). Calif Manag Rev 59(2):5–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresford A, Pettit S, Xu Q, Williams S (2012) A study of dry port development in China. Marit Econ Logist 14(1):73–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhofen DM, El-Sahli Z, Kneller R (2016) Estimating the effects of the container revolution on world trade. J Int Econ 98:36–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhoopalam AK, Agatz N, Zuidwijk R (2018) Planning of truck platoons: a literature review and directions for future research. Transp Res B 107:212–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Bikas H, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G (2016) Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(1):389–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogers M, Hadar R, Bilberg A (2016) Additive manufacturing for consumer-centric business models: implications for supply chains in consumer goods manufacturing. Technol Forecast Soc Change 102:225–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges G (2016) Haftung für selbstfahrende Autos. Comput Recht 32(4):272–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchery Y, Fazi S, Fransoo JC (2015) Hinterland transportation in container supply chains. In: Lee CY, Meng Q (eds) Handbook of ocean container transport logistics: making global supply chains effective. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 497–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Boysen N, Fliedner M, Jaehn F, Pesch E (2013) A survey on container processing in railway yards. Transp Sci 47(3):312–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Caris A, Macharis C, Janssens GK (2012) Corridor network design in hinterland transportation systems. Flex Serv Manuf J 24(3):294–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlo HJ, Vis IF, Roodbergen KJ (2014) Transport operations in container terminals: literature overview, trends, research directions and classification scheme. Eur J Oper Res 236(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles L (2008) Sea-river shipping competitiveness and its geographical market area for the Rhône-Saône corridor. J Transp Geogr 16:100–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SL, Jeevan J, Cahoon S (2016) Malaysian container seaport-hinterland connectivity: status, challenges and strategies. Asian J Ship Logist 32(3):127–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, He Y, Yang Y, Niu S, Ren H (2017) The research status and development trend of additive manufacturing technology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(9):3651–3660

    Google Scholar 

  • Daduna JR (2009) Verkehrsträgerwettbewerb im Güterverkehr – Eine Scheindiskussion? In: Voß S, Pahl J, Schwarze S (eds) Logistik management – systeme, methoden, integration. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 247–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Daduna JR (2011) Aspects of information management in road freight transport. In: Böse J, Hu H, Jahn C, Shi X, Stahlbock R, Voß S (eds) Proceedings of the second international conference on computational logistics, ICCL’11. Springer, Berlin, pp 29–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Daduna JR (2013) Short sea shipping and river-sea shipping in the multi-modal transport of containers. Int J Ind Eng Theory Appl Pract 20(1–2):227–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Daduna JR, Hanisch M (2015) Impacts of the locks enlargement on the access to the Panama canal on maritime container transport in the Central American region. In: Dethloff J, Haasis HD, Kopfer H, Kotzab H, Schönberger J (eds) Logistics management. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 213–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Daduna JR, Hunke K, Prause G (2012) Analysis of short sea shipping-based logistics corridors in the Baltic Sea region. J Ship Ocean Eng 2:304–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrijevic B, Spasovic LN (2006) Innovative transportation technologies: an alternative for providing linkages between port terminals and inland freight distribution facilities. Contribution to METRANS National Urban Freight Conference (Long Beach, February 1–3, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Do NH, Nam KC, Le QLN (2011) A consideration for developing a dry port system in Indochina area. Marit Policy Manag 38(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragović B, Tzannatos E, Park NK (2017) Simulation modelling in ports and container terminals: literature overview and analysis by research field, application area and tool. Flex Serv Manuf J 29(1):4–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagnant DJ, Kockelman K (2015) Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transp Res A 77:167–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraedrich E, Lenz B (2016) Societal and individual acceptance of autonomous driving. In: Maurer M, Gerdes JC, Lenz B, Winner H (eds) Autonomous driving: technical, legal and social aspects. Springer, Berlin, pp 621–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Franc P, van der Horst M (2010) Understanding hinterland service integration by shipping lines and terminal operators: a theoretical and empirical analysis. J Transp Geogr 18(4):557–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederich F, Mairhofer F, Schabert M Hans (2002) The CargoMover®: an innovation for automated freight transportation. ZEVrail Glasers Annalen 126(10):442–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasser TM (2016) Fundamental and special legal questions for autonomous vehicles. In: Maurer M, Gerdes JC, Lenz B, Winner H (eds) Autonomous driving: technical, legal and social aspects. Springer, Berlin, pp 523–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattuso D, Cassone GC, Lucisano A, Lucisano M, Lucisano F (2017) Automated rail wagon for new freight transport opportunities. In: 2017 5th IEEE international conference on models and technologies for intelligent transportation systems (MT-ITS), pp 57–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Gharehgozli AH, Roy D, de Koster R (2016) Sea container terminals: new technologies and OR models. Marit Econ Logist 18(2):103–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon TJ, Lidberg M (2015) Automated driving and autonomous functions on road vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn 53(7):958–994

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimstad A, Neumann-Larsen E (2013) Ultra-large container vessels: can the economy of scale be quantified? Container Ship Update 1:4–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Halim R, Kauppila J, Martinez L, Merk O (2017) International freight. OECD Publishing, Paris, pp 69–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymann E (2006) Containerschifffahrt: Überkapazitäten trotz steigender Nachfrage programmiert. Aktuelle Themen 347, Deutsche Bank Research, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • International Association of Ports and Harbors (IAPH) (2017) World container traffic data 2017: world top 20 ports, 2007–2016. http://www.iaphworldports.org/iaph/wp-content/uploads/WorldPortTraffic-Data_for_IAPH_using_LL_data_2017_Final.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2019

  • Islamjanova A, Iddrisu I, Suy R, Bekbaunova D, Suleiman AS (2017) The impact of silk road economic belt on economic development of the Republic of Kazakhstan - the case of Khorgos City. J Soc Sci Stud 4(2):177–192

    Google Scholar 

  • James KA, Gurol S (2006) Urban Maglev freight container movement at the ports of Los Angeles/Long Beach. In: Contribution to METRANS National Urban Freight Conference, Long Beach, February 1–3, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaržemskis A, Vasisliaukas AV (2007) Research on dryport concept as intermodal node. Transport 22:207–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang X, Chew EP, Lee LH (2015) Innovative container terminals to improve global container transport chains. In: Lee CY, Meng Q (eds) Handbook of ocean container transport logistics: making global supply chains effective. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 3–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang R, Kleer R, Piller FT (2017) Predicting the future of additive manufacturing: a Delphi study on economic and societal implications of 3D printing for 2030. Technol Forecast Soc Change 117:84–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamali M, Dennis LA, McAree O, Fisher M, Veres SM (2017) Formal verification of autonomous vehicle platooning. Sci Comput Program 148:88–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Khajavi SH, Partanen J, Holmström J (2014) Additive manufacturing in the spare parts supply chain. Comput Ind 65(1):50–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer I (2016) Autonomes Fahren auf Hafengleisen. HANSA Int Marit J 153(11):82–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreutzberger E, Konings R (2016) The challenge of appropriate hub terminal and hub-and-spoke network development for seaports and intermodal rail transport in Europe. Res Transp Bus Manag 19:83–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakidis M, van de Weijer C, van Arem B, Happee R (2015) The deployment of advanced driver assistance systems in Europe. In: 22nd ITS World Congress, Bordeaux, France, October 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee ES, Song DW (2015) Competition and co-operation in maritime logistics operations. In: Lee CY, Meng Q (eds) Handbook of ocean container transport logistics: making global supply chains effective. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 477–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Jiang B (2014) Cooperation performance evaluation between seaport and dry port; Case of Qingdao port and Xi’an port. Int J e-Navig Marit Econ 1:99–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Jia G, Cheng Y, Hu Y (2017) Additive manufacturing technology in spare parts supply chain: a comparative study. Int J Prod Res 55(5):1498–1515

    Google Scholar 

  • Limbourg S (2007) Planification strategique de systemes de transport de marchandises en Europe: Modèles de localisations optimales de hubs de conteneurs sur un réseau multimodal. These de doctorat, Falcultés Universitaires Catholiques de Mons, Mons

    Google Scholar 

  • Limbourg S, Jourquin B (2009) Optimal rail-road container terminal locations on the European network. Transp Res E 45(4):551–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Meng Q, Wang S, Sun Z (2014) Global intermodal liner shipping network design. Transp Res E 61:28–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfeld W (2010) Satellitenortung und Navigation, 3rd edn. Vieweg+Teubner, Braunschweig

    Google Scholar 

  • Medda F, Trujillo L (2010) Short-sea shipping: an analysis of its determinants. Marit Policy Manag 37(3):285–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng Q, Weng J, Suyi L (2017) Impact analysis of mega vessels on container terminal operations. Transp Res Procedia 25:187–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Merk O, Notteboom T (2015) Port hinterland connectivity. Discussion paper 2015-13, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Transport Forum (OECD/ITF)

    Google Scholar 

  • Merk O, Busquet B, Aronietis R (2015) The impact of mega-ships. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Transport Forum (OECD/ITF)

    Google Scholar 

  • Merk O, Busquet B, Aronietis R (2016) The impact of mega-ships: the case of Gothenburg. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Transport Forum (OECD/ITF)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr S, Khan O (2015) 3D printing and its disruptive impacts on supply chains of the future. Technol Innov Manag Rev 5(11):20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales-Fusco P, Saurí S, Lago A (2012) Potential freight distribution improvements using motorways of the sea. J Transp Geogr 24:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng AKY (2009) Competitiveness of short sea shipping and the role of port: the case of North Europe. Marit Policy Manag 36(4):337–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen C, Notteboom T (2016) Dry ports as extensions of maritime deep-sea ports: a case study of Vietnam. J Int Logist Trade 14(1):65–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Nießen N, Schindler CFW, Vallée DHA (2017) Assisted, automatic or autonomous operation: potential for rail traffic. Eisenbahntechnische Rundschau ETR 66(1):10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Ninnemann J (2015) Relevance of efficient hinterland access for the inter-port competitiveness of European container ports. In: Dethloff J, Haasis HD, Kopfer H, Kotzab H, Schönberger J (eds) Logistics management. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 227–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom TE (2004) Container shipping and ports: an overview. Rev Netw Econ 3(2):86–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom TE, Rodrigue JP (2008) Containerisation, box logistics and global supply chains: the integration of ports and liner shipping networks. Marit Econ Logist 10:152–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilha F, Ng AKY (2012) The spatial evolution of dry ports in developing economies: the Brazilian experience. Marit Econ Logist 14(1):99–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Paixão Casaca AC, Marlow PB (2009) Logistics strategies for short sea shipping operating as part of multimodal transport chains. Marit Policy Manag 36(1):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Panayides PM, Song DW (2008) Evaluating the integration of seaport container terminals in supply chains. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 38:562–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Panayides PM, Parola F, Lam JSL (2015) The effect of institutional factors on public private partnership success in ports. Transp Res A 71:110–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastori E (2015) Modal share of freight transport to and from EU ports. European Parliament, Directorate-General for Internal Policies – Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies – Transport and Tourism. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/540350/IPOL_STU(2015)540350_EN.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2019

  • Petersen EE, Kidd RW, Pearce JM (2017) Impact of DIY home manufacturing with 3D printing on the toy and game market. Technologies 5(3):45

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaff R, Schmidt BD, Enning M (2017) Towards inclusion of the freight rail system in the industrial internet of things: Wagon 4.0. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, IMechE Stephenson Conference 2017, London, April 25–27, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Radmilović Z, Zobenica R, Maras̆ V (2011) River sea shipping competitiveness of various transport technologies. J Transp Geogr 19(6):1509–1516

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayna T, Striukova L (2016) From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: how 3D printing is changing business model innovation. Technol Forecast Soc Change 102:214–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigue JP (2008) The Thruport concept and transmodal rail freight distribution in North America. J Transp Geogr 16(4):233–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigue JP, Notteboom TE (2015) Containerization, box logistics and global supply chains: the integration of ports and liner shipping networks. In: Haralambides HE (ed) Port management. Palgrave Macmillan UK, Houndmills, pp 5–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa A, Roscelli R (2009) Innovative ideas and design of an integrated dry port and sea port system. In: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) (ed) Transport and communications bulletin for Asia and the Pacific 78 (Development of dry ports), pp 57–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose CR, Peterson DE, Leung EM (2008) Implementation of cargo MagLev in the United States. Presented at Maglev 2008: 20th International Conference on Maglev Systems and Drives San Diego, California, 12/15-18/2008. https://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/964981. Accessed 25 June 2019

  • Roso V (2008) Factors influencing implementation of a dry port. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 38:782–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Roso V, Rosa A (2015) Dry port in concept and practice. In: Song DW, Panayides P (eds) Maritime logistics: a guide to contemporary shipping and port management, 2nd edn. Kogan Page, London, pp 227–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Roso V, Woxenius J, Lumsden K (2009) The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland. J Transp Geogr 17:338–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos TA, Soares CG (2017) Modeling transportation demand in short sea shipping. Marit Econ Logist 19(4):695–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasson A, Johnson JC (2016) The 3D printing order: variability, supercenters and supply chain reconfigurations. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 46(1):82–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Savastano M, Amendola C, D’Ascenzo F, Massaroni E (2016) 3-D printing in the spare parts supply chain: an explorative study in the automotive industry. In: Caporarello L, Cesaroni F, Giesecke R, Missikoff M (eds) Digitally supported innovation. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 153–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreurs MA, Steuwer SD (2016) Autonomous driving: political, legal, social, and sustainability dimensions. In: Maurer M, Gerdes JC, Lenz B, Winner H (eds) Autonomous driving: technical, legal and social aspects. Springer, Berlin, pp 149–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Semak YA, Raimbelov BK, Assanova MK, Kozhabergenova (2017) Development of transport system of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Economy 85(1):45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegmann J, Heidmeier S (2005) Improved quality of rail freight service by using self-propelled freight wagons. In: Konings R, Priemus H, Nijkamp P (eds) The future of automated freight transport. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 35–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack B (1999) Satellite terminals: a local solution to hub congestion? J Transp Geogr 7:241–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack B (2007) The terminalisation of seaports. In: Wang J, Olivier D, Notteboom T, Slack B (eds) Ports, cities and global supply chains, Ashgate, Farnham, pp 41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) (2014) Standard J3016 – levels of driving automation related to on-road motor vehicles. https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_201401/. Accessed 25 June 2019

  • Stahlbock R, Voß S (2008) Operations research at container terminals: a literature update. OR Spectr 30:1–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenken D, Voß S, Stahlbock R (2004) Container terminal operation and operation research: a classification and literature review. OR Spectr 26:3–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzannatos E, Papadimitriou S, Katsouli A (2014) The cost of modal shift: a short sea shipping service compared to its road alternative in Greece. Eur Transp 56(2):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) – Secretariat (2016 and previous years) Review of maritime transport

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Horst MR, de Langen PW (2015) Coordination in hinterland transport chains: a major challenge for the seaport community. Palgrave Macmillan UK, Basingstoke, pp 57–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Vining AR, Boardman AE (2008) The potential role of public private partnerships in the upgrade of port infrastructure: normative and positive considerations. Marit Policy Manag 35(6):551–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Zhang M, Ma J, Zhou X (2016) Survey on driverless train operation for urban rail transit systems. Urban Rail Transit 2(3):106–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller C, Kleer R, Piller FT (2015) Economic implications of 3D printing: market structure models in light of additive manufacturing revisited. Int J Prod Econ 164:43–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesmann B, Snoei JR, Hilletofth P, Eriksson D (2017) Drivers and barriers to reshoring: a literature review on offshoring in reverse. Eur Bus Rev 29(1):15–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisnicki B, Chybowski L, Czarnecki M (2017) Analysis of the efficiency of port container terminals with the use of the data envelopment analysis method of relative productivity evaluation. Manag Syst Prod Eng 25(1):9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Wits WW, García JRR, Becker JMJ (2016) How additive manufacturing enables more sustainable end-user maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) strategies. Procedia CIRP 40:693–698

    Google Scholar 

  • World Shipping Council (2017) Container ship design. http://www.worldshipping.org/about-the-industry/liner-ships/container-ship-design. Accessed 25 June 2019

  • Zhang J, Ioannou PH, Chassiakos A (2006) Intelligent transportation system for container movement between inland port and terminals. METRANS Transportation Center, California. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a1b2/bcc5e52c6cccfe569a4901579eb6edfed9a2.pdf?_ga=2.202019025.1959022392.1561891207-834833028.1561891207. Accessed 25 June 2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Berlin School of Economics and Law - Campus Schöneberg, Berlin, Germany

    Joachim R. Daduna

  2. Institute of Information Systems - University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Robert Stahlbock

  3. FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie und Management, Essen / Hamburg, Germany

    Robert Stahlbock

Authors
  1. Joachim R. Daduna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Stahlbock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim R. Daduna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, Suderburg, Niedersachsen, Germany

    Jürgen W. Böse

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Daduna, J.R., Stahlbock, R. (2020). Importance of Hinterland Transport Network Structures for Seaport Container Terminals: An Update. In: Böse, J.W. (eds) Handbook of Terminal Planning. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39990-0_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation