Skip to main content

ANAC 2018: Repeated Multilateral Negotiation League

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (JSAI 2019)

Abstract

This is an extension from a selected paper from JSAI2019. There are a number of research challenges in the field of Automated Negotiation. The Ninth International Automated Negotiating Agent Competition encourages participants to develop effective negotiating agents, which can negotiate with multiple opponents more than once. This paper discusses research challenges for such negotiations as well as presenting the competition set-up and results. The results show that winner agents mostly adopt hybrid bidding strategies that take their opponents’ preferences as well as their strategy into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aydoğan, R., Festen, D., Hindriks, K.V., Jonker, C.M.: Alternating offers protocols for multilateral negotiation. In: Fujita, K., Bai, Q., Ito, T., Zhang, M., Ren, F., Aydoğan, R., Hadfi, R. (eds.) Modern Approaches to Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation, pp. 153–167. Springer (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aydoğan, R., Hindriks, K.V., Jonker, C.M.: Multilateral mediated negotiation protocols with feedback. In: Novel Insights in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation, pp. 43–59. Springer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baarslag, T.: What to bid and when to stop. Dissertation, Delft University of Technology (2014). https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:3df6e234-a7c1-4dbe-9eb9-baadabc04bca

  4. Baarslag, T., Aydoğan, R., Hindriks, K.V., Fuijita, K., Ito, T., Jonker, C.M.: The automated negotiating agents competition, 2010–2015. AI Mag. 36(4), 115–118 (2015). http://www.aaai.org/ojs/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/2609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baarslag, T., Fujita, K., Gerding, E., Hindriks, K., Ito, T., Jennings, N.R., Jonker, C., Kraus, S., Lin, R., Robu, V., Williams, C.: Evaluating practical negotiating agents: results and analysis of the 2011 international competition. Artif. Intell. J. (AIJ) 198, 73–103 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baarslag, T., Fujita, K., Gerding, E.H., Hindriks, K., Ito, T., Jennings, N.R., Jonker, C., Kraus, S., Lin, R., Robu, V., Williams, C.R.: Evaluating practical negotiating agents: results and analysis of the 2011 international competition. Artif. Intell. 198, 73–103 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baarslag, T., Gerding, E.H., Aydoğan, R., Schraefel, M.: Optimal negotiation decision functions in time-sensitive domains. In: IEEE International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, vol. 2, pp. 190–197. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baarslag, T., Hindriks, K., Jonker, C.M., Kraus, S., Lin, R.: The first automated negotiating agents competition (ANAC 2010). In: Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V., Fatima, S., Matsuo, T. (eds.) New Trends in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiations. Series of Studies in Computational Intelligence, pp. 113–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24696-8_7

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baarslag, T., Hindriks, K.V.: Accepting optimally in automated negotiation with incomplete information. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS 2013), pp. 715–722 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fatima, S., Kraus, S., Wooldridge, M.: Principles of Automated Negotiation. Cambridge University Press, New York (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Fujita, K.: Automated strategy adaptation for multi-times bilateral closed negotiations. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2014), pp. 1509–1510 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fujita, K.: Compromising adjustment strategy based on TKI conflict mode for multi-times bilateral closed negotiations. Comput. Intell. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/coin.12107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fujita, K., Ito, T., Klein, M.: A secure and fair protocol that addresses weaknesses of the nash bargaining solution in nonlinear negotiation. Group Decis. Negot. 21(1), 29–47 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fujita, K., Ito, T., Klein, M.: Efficient issue-grouping approach for multiple interdependent issues negotiation between exaggerator agents. Decis. Support Syst. 60, 10–17 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gal, K., Ilany, L.: The fourth automated negotiation competition, pp. 129–136. Springer, Tokyo (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55525-4_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Jennings, N.R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A., Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Wooldridge, M.: Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. de Jonge, D., Baarslag, T., Aydoğan, R., Jonker, C.M., Fujita, K., Ito, T.: The challenge of negotiation in the game of diplomacy. In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Agreement Technologies (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jonker, C.M., Aydoğan, R., Baarslag, T., Fujita, K., Ito, T., Hindriks, K.V.: Automated negotiating agents competition (ANAC). In: AAAI, pp. 5070–5072 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kawaguchi, S., Fujita, K., Ito, T.: Compromising strategy based on estimated maximum utility for automated negotiation agents competition (ANAC-10). In: 24th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems (IEA/AIE d2011), pp. 501–510 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lin, R., Kraus, S., Baarslag, T., Tykhonov, D., Hindriks, K., Jonker, C.M.: Genius: an integrated environment for supporting the design of generic automated negotiators. Comput. Intell. 30(1), 48–70 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00463.x

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Mell, J., Gratch, J., Baarslag, T., Aydoğan, R., Jonker, C.M.: Results of the first annual human-agent league of the automated negotiating agents competition. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, IVA 2018, pp. 23–28. ACM, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3267851.3267907

  22. Williams, C., Robu, V., Gerding, E., Jennings, N.: An overview of the results and insights from the third automated negotiating agents competition (ANAC 2012). In: Marsa-Maestre, I., Lopez-Carmona, M., Ito, T., Zhang, M., Bai, Q., Fujita, K. (eds.) Novel Insights in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 535, pp. 151–162. Springer, Japan (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Zafari, F., Mofakham, F.N.: POPPONENT: highly accurate, individually and socially efficient opponent preference model in bilateral multi issue negotiations. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2017), pp. 5100–5104 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is part of the Veni research programme with project number 639.021.751, which is financed by the The Dutch Research Council (NWO). We are thankful for the sponsorship of the ANAC competition by the Artificial Intelligence Journal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reyhan Aydoğan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Aydoğan, R., Fujita, K., Baarslag, T., Jonker, C.M., Ito, T. (2020). ANAC 2018: Repeated Multilateral Negotiation League. In: Ohsawa, Y., et al. Advances in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1128. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39878-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics