Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Valuable Intersections: Why CSR Requires Mindfulness for Higher Ed Leaders

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

While academic leaders are under pressure to expand partnerships and acquisition of financial support, a main area of partnering has become companies. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a powerful interface that the business world provides to higher education for vital resources if planned and managed well with appropriate mutual goals. Mindful leadership is valuable to plan, orchestrate, and reflect on actions including those relating to inter-organizational behavior, which is highly visible. To be successful, higher education leaders need to utilize mindfulness to manage and leverage win–win relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbot, E., Borchert, A., Dwyer, M., Fuller, C., Gibbs, G., Hanifan, M., … Zeller, K. (2011). Five elements of a successful twenty-first century University corporate relations program (White Paper). Network of Academic Corporate Relations Officers Benchmarking Committee. Retrieved from http://web.mac.com/nacro/NACRO/Welcome_files/White_Paper_FINAL.pdf

  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baden, D., & Harwood, I. A. (2013). Terminology matters: A critical exploration of corporate social responsibility terms. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 615–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/2/10551-012-1498-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, J., Achbar, M., & Abbott, J. (2003). The corporation (movie). Brooklyn, NY: Big Picture Media Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. P. (2012). Business and its environment (7th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big give personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield, M., & Frynas, J. G. (2005). Setting new agendas: Critical perspective on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. International Affairs, 81(3), 499–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. D. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (6th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. (2003). Legitimacy in the academic presidency: From entrance to exit. Washington, DC: Roman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. (2011). Fundraising advice for college and university presidents: An insider’s guide. Washington, DC: AGB Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. E., & McKee, A. (2005). Resonant leadership: Renewing yourself and connecting with others through mindfulness, hope, and compassion. Boston, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, D. S., Fry, R. E., & Cooperrider, D. L. (2006). Transformative innovations for the mutual benefit of business, society, and environment. BAWB Interactive Working Paper Series, 1(1), 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell. (2018). 2018 Corporate social responsibility report executive summary: Where we’re headed. Camden, NJ: Campbell Soup Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie, D. (1998). How to win friends & influence people. Riverside, NJ: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2017). Business & society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management (10th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, M. (2008). The mindful leader: Ten principles for bringing out the best in ourselves and others. Boston, MA: Trumpeter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G., & Martinez-Martinez, A. (2009). Linking corporate social responsibility with admiration through organizational outcomes. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(4), 499–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaskalson, M. (2011). The mindful workplace: Developing resilient individuals and resonant organizations with MBSR. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, T. A., Colledge, B., Ellerbrock, M., Lynch, K., McGowan, D., Patera, S., … See, J. (2012, August 2). Metrics for a successful twenty-first century academic corporate relations program (White Paper). Network of Academic Corporate Relations Officers Benchmarking Committee. Retrieved from http://www.nacroonline.org

  • Clevenger, M. R. (2014). An organizational analysis of the inter-organizational relationships between a public American higher education university and six United States corporate supporters: An instrumental, ethnographic case study using Cone’s corporate citizenship spectrum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clevenger, M. R. (2016). Senior leaders as effective fundraisers: A toolbox for dealing with complexities in the new ecology. In H. C. Alphin Jr., J. Lavine, S. Stark, & A. Hocker’s (Eds.), Facilitating higher education growth through fundraising and philanthropy (pp. 82–107). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clevenger, M. R. (2018). Mandate for higher ed leaders: Effective fundraising and resource development. International Journal of Technology and Educational Marketing (IJTEM), 8(1), 48–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clevenger, M. R. (2019). Corporate citizenship and higher education: Behavior, engagement, and ethics. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clevenger, M. R., & MacGregor, C. J. (2016). The role of corporate and foundation relations development officers. In H. C. Alphin Jr., J. Lavine, S. Stark, & A. Hocker’s (Eds.), Facilitating higher education growth through fundraising and philanthropy (pp. 256–293). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clevenger, M. R., & MacGregor, C. J. (2019). Business and corporation engagement with higher education: Models, theories, and best practices. Bingley: Emerald.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cone, C. (2010). The new era of global corporate citizenship & compliance. Paper presented at Net Impact Conference, October 27, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, A. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and business ethics. In J. Conill, C. Luetge, & T. Schönwälder-Kuntze’s (Eds.), Corporate citizenship, contractarianism and ethical theory: On philosophical foundations of business ethics (pp. 69–78). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, H. (2019). Mindfulness at work: Using mindful leadership in the workplace. Positive Psychology Program. Retrieved from https://positivepsychologyprogram.com/mindfulness-at-work/

  • Crane, A., Matten, D., McWilliams, A., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. S. (Eds.). (2008). The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, M. M., & Dabars, W. B. (2015). Designing the new American university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, J., & Lewis, S. (2003). CSR in stakeholder expectations: And their implications for company strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D. L. (1998). The effective advancement professional: Management principles and practices. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Hond, F., de Bakker, F. G. A., & Neergaard, P. (2007). Managing social responsibility in action: Talking, doing and measuring. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, N. D., & Huels, F. (2014). Fundraising and institutional advancement: Theory, practice, and new paradigms. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1954). The practice of management. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunoon, D., & Langer, E. (2012). Mindful leadership communication: Three keys for action. Training & Development, 39(3), 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. (2008). Just another emperor? The myths and realities of philanthrocapitalism. New York, NY: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essex, G. L., & Ansbach, C. (1993). Fund raising in a changing economy: Notes for presidents and trustees. Foundation Development Abstracts, III(2), 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, R. N., & Hogue, W. D. (1973). Corporate social responsibility. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. (2002). Successful fundraising: A complete handbook for volunteers and professionals. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes Coaches Council. (2018). 14 simple steps to encourage mindfulness in your workplace. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescoachescouncil/2018/07/19/14-simple-steps-to-encourage-mindfulness-in-your-workplace/#2d243a3826e8

  • Forbes Coaches Council. (2019). 15 tips to help business leaders be more mindful when speaking to team members. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescoachesCouncil/2019/04/18/15-tips-to-help-business-leaders-be-more-mindful-when-speaking-to-team-members/#36e32f1033324

  • Frederick, W. C. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: Deep roots, flourishing growth, promising future. In A. Crane, A. Williams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 522–532). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, H. L. (1991). Corporate strategic philanthropy: A million here, a million there, it can add up to real corporate choices. Vital Speeches of the Day, 246–250. Speech given to the Business Leaders of Europe on September 16, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frooman, J. (1997). Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior with shareholder wealth: A meta-analysis of event studies. Business & Society, 36(3), 221–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garecht, J. (2015). Major donor fundraising 101. The Fundraising Authority. Retrieved from http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/individual-fundraising/major-donor-fundraising-101/

  • Garriga, E., & MelĂ©, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, B. (2016). The power of mindful leadership. Huffington Post. Retrieved from https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-power-of-mindful-lead_b_7878482

  • George, J. M. (2000). Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence. Human Relations, 53(8), 1027–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glomb, T. M., Duffy, M. K., Bono, J. E., & Yang, T. (2011). Mindfulness at work. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 30, 115–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (2010). Leadership: The power of emotional intelligence. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (2015). Focus: The hidden driver of excellence. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, D. J., Lyddy, C. J., Glomb, T. M., Bono, J. E., Brown, K. W., Duffy, M. K., … Lazar, S. W. (2015). Journal of Management, 42(1), 114–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Googins, B. K., Mirvis, P. H., & Rochlin, S. A. (2007). Beyond good company. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, E. (2003). The university in a corporate culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., Christianson, M. K., & Price, R. H. (2007). Happiness, health, or relationships? Managerial practices and employee well-being tradeoffs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(3), 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., & Sharma, N. (2009). CSR—A business opportunity. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(3), 396–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J. C. (2003). Diversifying campus revenue streams: Opportunities and risks. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, J. B. (2010). Leading the way: The role of presidents and academic deans in fundraising. In J. B. Hodson & B. W. Speck’s (Eds.), Perspectives on fund raising: New directions for higher education, number 149 (pp. 39–49). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • HĂĽlsheger, U. R., Alberts, H. J. E. M., Feinholdt, A., & Lang, J. W. B. (2013). Benefits of mindfulness at work: The role of mindfulness in emotion regulation, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 310–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, P. K., Lee, R. A., & Mills, M. J. (2015). Mindfulness at work: A new approach to improving individual and organizational performance. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(4), 576–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, N., & Moon, J. (2012). Institutional complementarity between corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: A comparative institutionalism of three capitalisms. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 85–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, B. (2004). Juggling act: Today’s college or university president must be a champion fundraiser and a strong internal leader. University Business, 7(7), 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnicutt, S., & Pinney, C. (2010). Getting to the roots of success: The leadership competencies that grow corporate citizenship pros. The Corporate Citizen, 4, 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudesia, R. S. (2019). Mindfulness as metacognitive practice. Academy of Management Review, 44(2), 405. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, D., & Washburn, N. T. (2012). Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. The Academy of Management, 37(2), 300–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, A. T., & Weber, J. (2017). Business and society: Stakeholders, ethics, public policy (15th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levesque, C., & Brown, K. W. (2007). Mindfulness as a moderator of the effect of implicit motivational self-concept on day-to-day behavioral motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 284–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, B. R. (2012). Defining your leadership role in promoting ethical practice. Paper presented at the Association of Fundraising Professionals’ 49th AFP International Conference on Fundraising, Vancouver, BC. Retrieved from http://conference.afpnet.org/

  • MacAllister, J. A. (1991). Why give? Notes to a new CEO. In J. P. Shannon (Ed.), The corporate contributions handbook: Devoting private means to public needs (pp. 121–125). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, C., & Andriof, J. (1998). Towards an understanding of corporate citizenship and how to influence it. Citizenship Studies, 2(2), 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621029808420686

  • Marturano, J. (2015). Finding the space to lead: A practical guide to mindful leadership. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence: Implications for educators. In P. Salovey & D. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development, emotional literacy, and emotional intelligence (pp. 3–31). New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, M. (Ed.). (2016). Globalization and corporate citizenship: The alternative gaze. Sheffield: Greenleaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, S. (2014). Mindfulness at work: How to avoid stress, achieve more, and enjoy life! Pompton Plains, NJ: The Career Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milham, A., & Parsons, G. (2016). Mindful leadership. Leadership Excellence Essentials, 33(6), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2005). Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3), 429–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munilla, L. S., & Miles, M. P. (2005). The corporate social responsibility continuum as a component of stakeholder theory. Business and Society Review, 110(4), 371–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olano, H. A., Kachan, D., Tannenbaum, S. L., Mehta, A., Annane, D., & Lee, D. J. (2015). Engagement in mindfulness practices by U.S. adults: Sociodemographic barriers. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 21(2), 100–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, E. (2018). Administration slashes federal afterschool funding. After School Alliance. Retrieved from http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/afterschoolSnack/Administration-slashes-federal-afterschool-funding_02-12-2018.cfm

  • Pinney, C., & Kinnicutt, S. (2010). Leadership competencies for community involvement: Getting to the roots of success. Boston, MA: The Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto-CarrĂłn, M., Lund-Thomsen, P., Chan, A., Muro, A., & Bhusan, C. (2006). Critical perspectives on CSR and development: What we know, what we don’t know, and what we need to know. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs), 82(5), 977–987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichart, J. (1999). Corporate ethics and environmental values: Issues, perceptions, and the logic of stakeholder action. Unpublished dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, F. H. T. (2001). The creation of the future: The role of the American university. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, T., & Berman, S. (2000). A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business and Society, 39(4), 397–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saul, J. (2011). The end of fundraising: Raise more money selling your impact. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. T. (1945). Administrative behavior. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirsly, C.-A. T. (2009). 75 years of lessons learned: Chief executive officer values and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management, 15(1), 78–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stangis, D. (2007). Where does philanthropy fit in the CSR spectrum? CSR@Intel Blog. Retrieved from http://blogs.intel.com/csr/2007/07/

  • Stangis, D., & Smith, K. V. (2017). The executive’s guide to 21st century corporate citizenship: How your company can win the battle for reputation and impact. Bingley: Howard House, Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sturgis, R. (2006). Presidential leadership in institutional advancement: From the perspective of the president and the vice president of institutional advancement. International Journal of Higher Educational Advancement, 6(3), 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, A. H. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. (2004). Parallel universes: Companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 109(1), 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walach, H., Buchheld, N., Buttenmuller, V., Kleinknecht, N., & Schmidt, S. (2006). Measuring mindfulness--The Freiburg mindfulness inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1543–1555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6(3), 280–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warhurst, A. (2001). Corporate citizenship and corporate social investment: Drivers of tri-sector partnerships. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Spring, 1, 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, S. (2009). The complete guide to fundraising management. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(3), 229–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Carroll, M. (2006). Awake at work: 35 Practical Buddhist principles for discovering clarity and balance in the midst of work’s chaos. Boston, MA: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J., van der Heijden, A., & Jonker, J. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Making sense through thinking and acting. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 380–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dane, E., & Brummel, B. J. (2013). Examining workplace mindfulness and its relations to job performance and turnover intention. Human Relations, 67(1), 105–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Schutter, O. (2008). Corporate social responsibility European style. European Law Journal, 14(2), 203–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, D. (2015). Mindful work: How meditation is changing business from the inside out. New York, NY: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, M. (2012). Mindful leadership: The 9 ways to self-awareness, transforming yourself, and inspiring others. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardjono, T., & de Klein, P. (2004). Introduction on the European corporate sustainability framework (ECSF). Journal of Business Ethics, 55(2), 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamili, D., & Mirshak, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York: Hyperion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy/bpg016.

  • Leary, M. R. (2007). The curse of the self: Self-awareness, egotism, and the quality of human life. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salovey, P., & Sluyter, D. (Eds.). (1997). Emotional development, emotional literacy, and emotional intelligence. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Monarch Business School, Zug, Switzerland & Grove College of Business, Shippensburg University, Shippensburg, Pennsylvania, USA

    Morgan R. Clevenger

Authors
  1. Morgan R. Clevenger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Woodbury University School of Business, Burbank, CA, USA

    Joan Marques  & Satinder Dhiman  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Clevenger, M.R. (2020). Valuable Intersections: Why CSR Requires Mindfulness for Higher Ed Leaders. In: Marques, J., Dhiman, S. (eds) Social Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39676-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation