Skip to main content

Gustav Špet’s “Hermeneutical Phenomenology” Project: His Reinterpretation of Husserl’s Phenomenology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Early Phenomenology in Central and Eastern Europe

Part of the book series: Contributions to Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 113))

  • 193 Accesses

Abstract

Over the past several decades, the figure of Gustav Špet (1879–1937) has grown unceasingly in prominence, and the significance of his work in contemporary philosophy has increased accordingly. Alongside this process has been another, equally relentless one—that of the elaboration and enrichment of our conceptions of this philosopher’s creative character, as well as of the nature and essence of his philosophy. Špet is set to become yet another major figure in the synthesis of the humanities that emerged during the first half of the twentieth century. From the point of view of historical fact, Špet’s involvement with the phenomenological movement is limited to him being Husserl’s student in Göttingen from 1912–1913, and to their subsequent written correspondence. Appearance and Sense, his monograph devoted to the problems of phenomenology, was published in 1914. The interweaving of phenomenology and hermeneutics that occurred in Appearance and Sense allowed Špet to reveal the very essence of phenomenology, the exact essence which, according to him, Husserl was unable to unveil. Here he relied on hermeneutics to present phenomenology in a fundamental way. In this text, hermeneutics and phenomenology are bound tightly together, and they intersect constantly. Following A. Savin, we endeavour to justify the thesis that hermeneutics only gained meaning within the scope of his phenomenological program, and as such for Špet himself hermeneutics most likely served to provide a detailed commentary of his phenomenological research with no independent significance of its own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Regarding Heidegger, we should put a special focus on the figure of Špet. After all, Heidegger was the thinker who proposed a radical revision of the subject, method, and implementation of philosophical work. He was, on the one hand, fashioning his ontological project in close connection with the traditional views which had already become thoroughly obscured in his day, and in a break with the tradition and a claim to a fundamentally new initiation, on the other hand. These claims Heidegger made, which might seem excessive, were in fact partly justified, due to the fact that one of the major questions that agitated Heidegger throughout his intellectual life was the question of what philosophy is. So Heidegger’s destruction of the philosophical tradition, the destruction which was this tradition’s only means of survival, emerged as a result of the attempts made to answer this central question. All the above makes us think of Špet, as both thinkers believed that the revival of genuine philosophy is possible through returning to its origins and to real philosophical problems.

  2. 2.

    Anna Han notes, “In the course of interpreting Husserl’s phenomenology of consciousness, Špet made two critical corrections to this system in his Appearance and Sense. … Špet saw a void in Husserl’s doctrine which consisted in the fact that he had not emphasized social existence as a special kind of existence and had not elaborated a phenomenological method of describing it. According to Špet, phenomenology as such would have experienced certain modifications and obtained some new cultural perspectives with the elaboration of such a method. The second critical correction Špet made pertains to the definition of the category of ‘sense’. Špet believed that, while describing the logical sphere as pertaining to a specific act within the whole of intentional experience, Husserl defined notion (that which expresses the meaning), but he did not define sense. According to Špet’s philosophical reasoning, sense represents not an abstract, logical area of an object but its inherent characteristic, an essential feature of the real being of an object. Therefore, the main question concerns the way in which an object can reveal sense, concealed within as the truth in…” (Denn et al. 2014).

References

  • Denn, Mariz. 2009. Novyi vzglyad na germenevtiku cherez tvorchestvo Gustava Shpeta [A new view of hermeneutics through Gustav Špet’s oeuvre; in Russian]. In Tvorcheskoe nasledie G.G. Shpeta v kontekste sovremennogo gumanitarnogo znaniya. Pyatye shpetovskie chteniya. G.G. Shpet / Comprehensio. Pyatye shpetovskie chteniya[G.G. Špet’s oeuvre in the context of the contemporary humanitarian knowledge. Špet G.G. Comprehensio. The fifth Špet conference], ed. by Olga Mazaeva, 84–85. Tomsk: Natsional’nyi issledovatel’skii Tomskii gosudarstvennyi universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denn, Mariz, Anna Khan, Igor’ Mikhailov, Viktor Molchanov, Nelli Motroshilova, Tomas Nemet, Boris Pruzhinin, Alexei Savin, Fransuaza Tepp, Ul’rich Shmid, and Tatiana Shchedrina. 2014. Kniga “Yavlenie i smysl” Gustava Shpeta i ee znachenie v intellektual’noi kul’ture XX veka (materialy konferentsii-kruglogo stola) [Book Appearance and Sense by Gustav Špet and its value in intellectual culture of twentieth century (conference-round table proceedings); in Russian]. Voprosy filosofii 5: 129–171. http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=960. Accessed 29 October 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1986. Wahrheit und Methode. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grondin, Jean. 1994. Introduction to philosophical hermeneutics. Trans. Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven/London: Yale UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horuzhy, Sergei. 2010. K predelam fenomenologii: Shpet, Gusserl’ i intentsional’nost’ v mire dukhovnoi praktiki [To the limits of phenomenology: Špet, Husserl and intentionality in the world of spiritual practice; in Russian]. In Gustav Shpet i ego filosofskoe nasledie. U istokov semiotiki i strukturalizma [Gustav Špet and his philosophical heritage. At the origins of semiotics and structuralism], ed. by Mariz Denn, 130–143. Moscow: ROSSPEN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazaeva, Olga. 2010. K istorii issledovaniya tvorcheskogo naslediya G. Shpeta (obsuzhdenie problem filosofii yazyka) [On history of the research of Špet’s legacy (discussing problems of philosophy of language); in Russian]. Tomsk State University Journal Series Philosophy, Sociology, and Political Science 4 (12): 172–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, Paul. 2002. Konflikt interpretatsii. Ocherki o germenevtike[The conflict of interpretations: Essays in hermeneutics;in Russian]. Moscow: Kanon-Press-TS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savin, Аlexei. 2015. Fenomenologicheskoe istolkovanie germenevtiki Shpeta [Phenomenological interpretation of Špet’s hermeneutics; in Russian]. In Fenomenologo-ontologicheskiei zamysel G.G. Shpeta i gumanitarnye proekty XIX-XX vv.: G.G. Shpet/Comprehensio. Shestye shpetovskie chteniya: sbornik statei i materialov mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii (1–7 iyunya 2015 g.) [G.G. Špet’s phenomenological-ontological conception and humanitarian projects of 19-20th. G.G. Špet. Comprehensio. The sixth Špet conference: Conference proceedings (1–7 of June, 2015)], ed. by Olga Mazaeva, 342–352. Tomsk: Izdatel’stvo Tomskogo Universiteta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlan, James P. 1970. Nicholas Chernyshevsky and philosophical materialism in Russia. Journal of the History of Philosophy 8 (1): 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shchedrina, Tatiana, ed. 2005. Gustav Shpet: Zhizn’ v pis’makh. Epistolyarnoye naslediye[Gustav Špet: Life in letters. Epistolary heritage; in Russian]. Мoscow: ROSSPEN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shpet, Gustav. 1917. Mudrost’ ili razum? [Wisdom or reason?; in Russian]. Mysl’ i slovo 1: 1–69. 

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Appearance and sense. Phenomenology as the fundamental science and its problems. Trans: Thomas Nemeth. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Rabota po filosofii [Work on philosophy; in Russian]. Nachala 1: 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Yavlenie i smysl. Fenomenologiya kak osnovnaya nauka i ee glavnye problem [Appearance and sense. Phenomenology as the basic science and its main problems; in Russian]. In Mysl’ i slovo. Izbrannyye trudy[Thought and word. Selectas], ed. Gustav Shpet. Мoscow: ROSSPEN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shpet, Gustav, and Edmund Gusserl’. 1996. Otvetnye pis’ma G. Shpeta [Gustav Špet’s answerring letters; in Russian]. Logos 7: 123–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelberg, Herbert. 1960. The phenomenological movement. A historical introduction. Vol. 1. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Artemenko, N. (2020). Gustav Špet’s “Hermeneutical Phenomenology” Project: His Reinterpretation of Husserl’s Phenomenology. In: Płotka, W., Eldridge, P. (eds) Early Phenomenology in Central and Eastern Europe. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 113. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39623-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics