Skip to main content

Bosnian Post-Refuge Transnationalism and Ireland

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bosnian Post-Refugee Transnationalism

Abstract

By relying on the concepts of biopolitics and governmentality, this book attempts to ground Bosnian post-refugee transnationalism between racial states of Ireland and Bosnia, thus explaining its enforced nature. The following chapter grounds Bosnian refugee transnationalism in relation to the racial state of Ireland. It argues that particular nature of Irish interculturalism—Irish biopolitical regime of governmentality—enforced Bosnian post-refugee transnationalism. Homogenising and racialising practices of the Irish state and community development approach of the Irish interculturalism were main ways of achieving this. The chapter starts by a general discussion of the concept of interculturalism and narrows the discussion down to a specific example of Irish interculturalism. The chapter argues that the racial state of Ireland expressed its racialising and homogenising tendencies through a particular type of interculturalism that was based on community development approach. This type of interculturalism sees a nation state—in this case Ireland—as a mosaic of different ethnic groups which need to be managed by the state and assumes homogeneity and cohesion behind each group. Using my ethnographic data, this chapter argues that the Irish biopolitical regime of governmentality—as based on community development approach—failed to acknowledge the heterogeneity of the Bosnian population in Ireland, the lack of community sentiment and interconnected nature of Bosnian people with other people from the former Yugoslavia. It produced quite the opposite—it has enforced Bosnian post-refugee transnationalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, Ottoman Islamic Law institutionalised a pact of protection for the non-Islamic subject of the state, collectively known as dhimmi, where in return for their loyalty to the empire, expressed though paying of the jizya tax, they were guaranteed protection and freedom of religion and worship. The millet system of Ottoman Empire has been perceived as an early example of premodern religious pluralism (Sachedina 2001).

  2. 2.

    It is important to note that these models are not clear cut. Not only are there many overlaps between different scenarios, particularly with regard to temporal contexts, but there are inconsistencies within the models themselves. For example, with regard to the melting pot model, it assumes the initial cohort of diversity that will in time melt into the pivotal national identity. In practice, open entry and absorption of new values cannot continue indefinitely, as the incoming minority heritages are incorporated as add-on identities to the already established national value systems, hence the model incorporates the elements of core-plus model. Furthermore, it is questionable if it is possible to have such a unified development of composite national identity considering the power differentials present in all societies.

  3. 3.

    Delanty (2003) argues that the biggest problem with Western multiculturalism lies in the fact that its policies have produced division between cultural and social spheres.

  4. 4.

    Taylor argues that the politics of multiculturalism are about a demand for recognition by minority and subaltern groups. His thesis is based upon the assumption that our identity is partly shaped by the recognition of our own understanding of who we are, or the absence of that recognition. In addition, non-recognition or mis-recognition are forms of oppression. Since mis-recognition can be so oppressive ‘real’ recognition is not just courtesy, but a vital human need that is owed to people. The challenge, according to Taylor, is how to preserve the politics of universality that most Western nation states endorse while dealing with the incoming politics of particularity (Taylor 1994).

  5. 5.

    Descriptive multiculturalism describes the increasing heterogeneity in most post-1945 societies as a result of global political economic changes and increased migration following the demise of colonial regimes. Normative multiculturalism insists on cultural diversity and proliferation of values at the expense of the ideas of national cohesion and unified norms (Goldberg 2004).

  6. 6.

    By ‘cloning theory’ of nation states, he refers to a deep-seated presumption that a nation consists of homogenous, self-reproducing population groups. Therefore, replication of cultural as much as biological is the ground of nation making (Goldberg 2004).

  7. 7.

    The term was adopted from the policy statements of the European Commission, and it was initially applied to the education policy in Ireland before being extended to other areas (Farell and Watt 2001).

  8. 8.

    1997 was designated European Year Against Racism by the European Council of Ministers and member states. In response, in 1998 the National Consultative Committee on Racism and Interculturalism was created in Ireland. The Committee was comprised of government and non-government bodies and was established by the Department of Equality and Law Reform in order to ensure that the needs of minority ethnic groups would become mainstream concerns of the government and anti-racism and positive inclusion a focus of governmental policy (NCCRI 2009). It was closed in December 2008 due to government budget cuts.

  9. 9.

    It is broadly agreed (MacLaughlin 1994) that economic growth during the 1990s transformed Ireland from a country of net-emigration to one of net-immigration. 1996 was identified as a ‘migration turning point’ (Ruhs 2005). Since the recession, however, emigration has returned (CSO 2011; see also Smyth 2011).

  10. 10.

    The Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform (1999: 9) defines integration as ‘the ability to participate to the extent that a person needs and wishes in all the major components of society, without having to relinquish his or her own cultural identity’. Yet, as the turban and hijab examples show, in practice, there is a line to where cultural identity can be taken, which, when overstepped, threatens the cohesiveness of national identity.

  11. 11.

    Titley uses examples such as the murder of Theo van Gogh in the Netherlands and terrorist attacks in London and Madrid to show how the policy of multiculturalism was blamed for these atrocities.

  12. 12.

    The notion of the ‘golden thread of shared values’ was used by Gordon Brown to describe a need to reach back to the core set of social norms that define Britishness in the multicultural ‘crisis’ (Brown 2004).

  13. 13.

    Bosnian Orthodox and Bosnian Catholic populations were, in the light of the Yugoslav ideology of containing nationalism, perceived as having their homeland in Serbia and Croatia, respectively.

  14. 14.

    After the conflict when Bosnia and Herzegovina became an independent republic this identification was further transformed into ‘Bosnjak’.

  15. 15.

    Key concepts within the Yugoslav state’s nationalities’ policy were narodi and narodnosti. While the former was often translated in Western literature as ‘nation’ and latter as ‘ethnicity’, this translation does not convey the accurate meaning in the original usage of the terms (Shanin 1989; Bringa 1995). Narodi were the main constituent ethnicities of the six former republics of Yugoslavia, namely Slovenians, Croats, Serbs, Muslims (after 1961), Macedonians and Montenegrians. Narodnosti included other state recognised minority groups living of the territory of former Yugoslavia whether they were groups who nationally belong to other states, such as Albanians, or other ethnic groups like the Roma population.

  16. 16.

    The census of 1971 allows for the category of Bosanac but it defines it as regional rather than national belonging that fits the category of the undeclared.

  17. 17.

    Wahhabis would be clearly distinguishable on the streets of Bosnia due to their appearance. The men have shaved heads, long beards and wear shin-length trousers, while the women wear burqas.

  18. 18.

    Additionally, it relates to the reclaiming of their European cultural heritage prior to the Ottoman occupation, as well as to the old Orientalist debates concerning the dichotomous nature of Western versus Eastern belonging (Bakic-Hayden 1995).

  19. 19.

    The term nekulturni, while directly translating as ‘non-cultured’, does not exactly mean that these people have no culture. Rather it claims that the culture that they have is not the right kind of culture, it is not the ‘high’ culture of the urban population, but a traditional peasant culture. Furthermore, the term is not to be confused with the second meaning of nekultura in Serbo-Croat which refers to people without manners. While sometimes the second meaning is implied as part of the first, the connection is not straightforward.

  20. 20.

    Brcani are people from Brcko, a city in northern part of Bosnia and Herzegovina considered one of the urban centres in the country. In the post-Dayton Bosnia, following the Dayton Agreement, the Brcko District, of which Brcko is the capital city, is an independent unit of local self-government in Bosnia.

  21. 21.

    Raja and papak are the terms used specifically in Sarajevo. In other parts of the country, different terms are used for the same distinction.

  22. 22.

    ‘Mentality’ is a word used a lot in Serbo-Croat closely related to ‘mindset’.

  23. 23.

    ‘Incoming people’ refers to the demographic changes that have occurred in post-Dayton Bosnia resulting in many rural people moving into urban areas.

  24. 24.

    When she says ‘they’, she is referring to the Refugee Agency and other government bodies that have participated in the refugee resettlement process.

  25. 25.

    This is the last available breakdown of the cases handled by the project.

References

  • Al-Ali, N. 2002 ‘Gender relations, transnational ties and rituals among Bosnian Refugees’, Global Networks, Vol. 3/2, pp. 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthias, F. and Yuval-Davis, N. 1992 Racialised Boundaries: Race, Nation, Gender, Colour and Class and the Anti-racist Struggle, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, G. J., Graham, B. and Tunbridge, J. E. 2007 Pluralising Pasts: Heritages, Societies and Place Identities, Pluto, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Back, L., Keith, M., Khan, A., Shukra, K. and Solomos, J. 2002 ‘New Labour’s White Heart: Politics, Multiculturalism and the Return of Assimilation, Political Quarterly, Vol. 73/4, pp. 445–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakic-Hayden, M. 1995 ‘Nesting Orientalisms: The Case of Former Yugoslavia’, Slavic Review, Vol. 54/4, pp. 917–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balibar, É. 1988 ‘The Nation Form: History and Ideology’, in Balibar, E. and Wallerstein, I. (eds.), Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities, Verso, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodemann, Y. M. and Yurdakul, G. 2006 Migration, Citizenship, Ethnos, Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosnian Community Development Programme. 2005/2006 Working Plan for the Period 2005–2006, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosnian Community Development Project. 1998 Annual Report, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosnian Community Development Project. 2005 Annual Report, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosnian Community Development Project. 2007 Annual Report, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosnian Community Development Project. 2008 Annual Report, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringa, T. 1995 Being Muslim the Bosnian Way: Identity and Community in a Central Bosnian Village, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. 2004 ‘The golden thread that runs through our history’, The Guardian, 8 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, D. 2006 ‘The politics of community’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 9/4, pp. 603–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Statistics Office (CSO). 2011 ‘Press statement, census 2011 preliminary results’, http://www.cso.ie/en/media/csoie/census/documents/Press%20Release%20Census%202011%20Preliminary%20Results.pdf.

  • Cookburn, C. 1998 The Space Between Us: Negotiating Gender and National Identities in Conflict, Zed Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau, M. 1984 The Practice of Everyday Life, University of California Press, Berkley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delanty, G. 2003 Community, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA). 1999 ‘Departure of Second Group of Kosovar Refugees’, www.dfa.ie/home/index.aspx?id=26747.

  • Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform. 1999 Integration: A Two-Way Process: Report to the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform by the Interdepartmental Working Group on the Integration of Refugees in Ireland, DJELR, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanning, B. 2002 Racism and Social Change in the Republic of Ireland, Manchester University Press, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farell, F. and Watt, P. 2001 ‘Responding to racism in Ireland: An Overview’, in Farell, F. and Watt, P. (eds.), Responding to Racism in Ireland, Veritas, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, F. 2004 Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Polity on the Brink, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. T. 1994 Multiculturalism: A Critical Reader, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. T. 2004 ‘The space of multiculturalism’, Open Democracy, 16 September. http://www.opendemocracy.net/.

  • Gray, B. 2006 ‘Migrant integration policy: A nationalist fantasy of management and control’, Translocations, Vol. 1/1, pp. 118–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. 2000 ‘Conclusion: The multi-cultural question’, in Hesse, B. (ed.), Un/settled Multiculturalism: Diasporas, Entanglements, Transruptions, Zed Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, B. 1999 ‘It’s your world: Discrepant Multiculturalisms’, in Cohen, P. (ed.), New Ethnicities, Old Racisms?, Zed Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. 2003 ‘Bosnian refugees in Britain: Questioning community’, Sociology, Vol. 37/1, pp. 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. 2007 Multicultural Odysseys: Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 6, 585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentin, A. and Titley, G. 2011 The Crisis of Multiculturalism: Racism in a Neoliberal Age, Zed Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentin, R. (2012) ‘Turbans, Hijabs and other differences: “Integration from below” and Irish interculturalism’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, Vol. 15/2, pp. 226–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLaughlin, J. 1994 Ireland: The Emigrant Nursery and the World Economy, Cork University Press, Cork.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, H. 2008 ‘Ireland sets test for new citizens’, Guardian Weekly, 14 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVeigh, R. 2002 ‘Between reconciliation and pacification: The British state and community relations in the north of Ireland’, Community Development Journal, Vol. 37/1, pp. 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mrdjen, S. 2002 ‘Narodnost u popisima. Promjenjiva i nestalna kategorija’, BIBLID, 0038-982X, UDK 312.95 (497), pp. 77–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Consultative Committee on Racism and Interculturalism (NCCRI). 2003 Guidelines for Developing ‘Whole Organisation’ Approach to Address Racism and to Support Interculturalism, NCCRI, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Consultative Committee on Racism and Interculturalism (NCCRI). 2009 Background to NCCRI, http://www.nccri.ie.

  • National Consultative Committee on Racism and Interculturalism (NCCRI). 2001 Guidelines on Antiracism and Intercultural Training, NCCRI, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Minister for Integration. 2008 Migration Nation: Statement on Integration Strategy and Diversity Management, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, J. 2001 ‘Integration of Refugees in Ireland: Experience with Programme Refugees 1994–2000’, in Harvey, C. and Ward, M. (eds.), No Welcome Here? Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Ireland and Britain, Democratic Dialogue, Belfast.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan, C. 1998 Report of a Survey of the Vietnamese and Bosnian Refugee Communities Living in Ireland, Refugee Agency, Refugee Resettlement Research Project, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, F. 2007 ‘The choice is simple: All or nothing’, The Irish Times, 7 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, P. 1995 A Profile of the Bosnian Community in Ireland, 1995, Combat Poverty Agency, Bosnian Community Development Project, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Refugee Agency. 1998 Annual Report, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rex, J., Joly, D. and Wilpert, C. 1987 Immigrant Associations in Europe, Macmillan, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhs, M. 2005 Managing the Immigration and Employment of Non-EU Nationals in Ireland, The Policy Institute, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachedina, A. A. 2001 The Islamic Roots of Democratic Pluralism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanin, T. 1989 ‘Ethnicity in the Soviet Union: Analytical Perceptions and Political Strategies’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 3, pp. 409–23, 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. 2011 ‘Inflow of migrants may have been underestimated’, The Irish Times, 1 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefansson, A. 2007 ‘Urban exile: Locals, newcomers and the cultural transformation of Sarajevo’, in Bougarel, X., Helms, E. and Duijzings, G. (eds.), The New Bosnian Mosaic: Identities, Memories and Moral Claims in a Post-War Society, Ashgate, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 1994 ‘The politics of recognition’, in Goldberg, D. T. (ed.), Multiculturalism: A Critical Reader, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 2012 ‘Almost 4 000 from 115 countries became Irish at citizenship ceremony’, The Irish Times, 31 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunbridge, J. E. 2008 ‘Plural and multicultural heritages’, in Graham, B. and Howard, P. (eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Heritage and Identity, Ashgate, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, J. E. 1977 This Scene of Man: The Role and Structure of the City in the Geography of Western Civilisation, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, C. W. 2000 Multiculturalism, Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieviorka, M. 1998 ‘Is multiculturalism a solution?’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 21/5, pp. 881–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zena Project. 2000 Minutes of the Management Committee, Hibernian United Services Club, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maja Halilovic-Pastuovic .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Halilovic-Pastuovic, M. (2020). Bosnian Post-Refuge Transnationalism and Ireland. In: Bosnian Post-Refugee Transnationalism. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39564-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics