Advertisement

Summary and Outlook

Chapter
  • 253 Downloads
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

Semiconductor quantum optics is on the leap from the lab to real world applications. To advance the development of novel devices such as non-classical light sources and nanolasers based on semiconductor quantum dots, device engineers will need simulation tools that combine classical device physics with cavity quantum electrodynamics. This thesis is focused on the device scale modeling and numerical simulation of electrically driven quantum light sources based on semiconductor quantum dots. Therefore a broad range of different topics is treated and connected to methodically advance the state-of-the-art—from semi-classical device physics and elements of non-equilibrium thermodynamics to the theory of open quantum systems.

References

  1. 1.
    Bandelow U, Gajewski H, Hünlich R (2005) Fabry–Perot lasers: thermodynamics-based modeling. In: Piprek J (ed) Optoelectronic devices, chap 3. Springer, New York, pp 63–85.  https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27256-9_3
  2. 2.
    Bandelow U, Hünlich R, Koprucki T (2003) Simulation of static and dynamic properties of edge-emitting multiple-quantum-well lasers. IEEE J Sel Top Quant 9(3):798–806.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2003.818343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chow WW, Jahnke F (2013) On the physics of semiconductor quantum dots for applications in lasers and quantum optics. Prog Quantum Electron 37(3):109–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pquantelec.2013.04.001ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chow WW, Jahnke F, Gies C (2014) Emission properties of nanolasers during the transition to lasing. Light-Sci Appl 3:e201.  https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2014.82ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gies C, Florian M, Steinhoff A, Jahnke F (2017) Theory of quantum light sources and cavity-QED emitters based on semiconductor quantum dots. In: Michler P (ed) Quantum dots for quantum information technologies. Springer Series in Nano-Optics and Nanophotonics, chap 1. Springer, Cham, pp 3–40 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56378-7_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gies C, Gericke F, Gartner P, Holzinger S, Hopfmann C, Heindel T, Wolters J, Schneider C, Florian M, Jahnke F, Höfling S, Kamp M, Reitzenstein S (2017) Strong light-matter coupling in the presence of lasing. Phys Rev A 96:023806.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.023806
  7. 7.
    Grupen M, Hess K (1998) Simulation of carrier transport and nonlinearities in quantum-well laser diodes. IEEE J Quantum Electron 34(1):120–140.  https://doi.org/10.1109/3.655016ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gschrey M, Thoma A, Schnauber P, Seifried M, Schmidt R, Wohlfeil B, Krüger L, Schulze JH, Heindel T, Burger S, Schmidt F, Strittmatter A, Rodt S, Reitzenstein S (2015) Highly indistinguishable photons from deterministic quantum-dot microlenses utilizing three-dimensional in situ electron-beam lithography. Nat Commun 6:7662.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8662
  9. 9.
    Gu Q, Fainman Y (2017) Semiconductor nanolasers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316275122
  10. 10.
    Heindel T, Schneider C, Lermer M, Kwon SH, Braun T, Reitzenstein S, Höfling S, Kamp M, Forchel A (2010) Electrically driven quantum dot-micropillar single photon source with 34% overall efficiency. Appl Phys Lett 96(1):011107.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3284514ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Strauf S, Jahnke F (2011) Single quantum dot nanolaser. Laser Photonics Rev 5(5):607–633.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201000039

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics (WIAS)Leibniz Institute in Forschungsverbund Berlin e. V.BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations