Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Anthropocene: Conservation in a Human-Dominated Nature

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Conservation Biology

Abstract

Many scientists today argue for designating the present age as a new geologic epoch – the Anthropocene –characterized by unprecedented current effects of humans on climate, land use, and geologic processes. Today less than 25% of the Earth’s ice-free surface is uninhabited (“wild”) landscape. The rest is either densely occupied or highly modified by humans. Such anthropogenic biomes or “anthromes” may themselves be home to “novel ecosystems” containing species assemblages never previously observed. Urban areas represent the most novel anthromes of all, yet may be sites where the future of biodiversity conservation is determined. Today conservationists must help create a “responsible Anthropocene” where human influence is more beneficent toward nature, not only to prevent extinction of species but the extinction of experience between humans and nature.

If we are to have an accurate picture of the world, even in its present diseased condition, we must interpose between the unused landscape and the misused landscape a landscape that humans have used well.

Wendell Berry (1995:64)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  • Adams, L.W. 1994. Urban wildlife habits. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allee, W.C. 1949. Principles of animal ecology. Philadelphia: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C.B., M.V. Lencinas, P.K. Wallem, A.E.J. Valenzuela, M.P. Simanonok, and G. Martinez Pastur. 2014. Engineering by invasive species alters landscape-level ecosystem function, but does not affect biodiversity in freshwater systems. Diversity and Distributions 20: 214–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andow, D.A., P.M. Kareiva, S.A. Levin, and A. Okubo. 1990. Spread of invading organisms. Landscape Ecology 4: 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asah, S.T., and D.J. Blahna. 2013. Practical implications of understanding the influence of motivations on commitment to voluntary urban conservation stewardship. Conservation Biology 27: 866–875.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balmford, A., J.L. Moore, T. Brooks, N. Burgess, L.A. Hansen, P. Williams, and C. Rahbek. 2001. Conservation conflicts across Africa. Science 291: 2616–2619.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartz, R., U. Heink, and I. Kowarik. 2010. Proposed definition of environmental damage illustrated by the cases of genetically modified crops and invasive species. Conservation Biology 245: 675–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beninde, J., M. Veith, and A. Hochkirch. 2015. Biodiversity in cities needs space: A meta-analysis of factors determining intra-urban biodiversity variation. Ecology Letters 18: 581–592.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W. 1995. The obligation of care. Sierra 80 (no. 5, September/October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R.B. 2001. Birds and butterflies along urban gradients in two ecoregions of the U.S. In Biotic homogenization, ed. J.L. Lockwood and M.L. McKinney, 33–56. Norwell: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, T., A.B. Gustavo, G.A.B. Da Fonseca, and A.S.L. Rodrigues. 2004. Species, data, and conservation planning. Conservation Biology 18: 1682–1688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büscher, B., and R. Fletcher. 2019. Towards convivial conservation. Conservation and Society AOP: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J.R. 1996. The incipient Mediterranean fruit fly population in California: Implications for invasion biology. Ecology 77: 1690–1697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, J.T., and J.B. Geller. 1993. Ecological roulette: The global transport and invasion of non-indigenous marine organisms. Science 261: 78–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F.S., III, and A.M. Starfield. 1997. Time lags and novel ecosystems in response to climate change in Arctic Alaska. Climate Change 35: 449–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherwin, K.L., T.R. Seastedt, and K.N. Suding. 2009. Effects of nutrient manipulations and grass removal on cover, species composition, and invasibility of an adventive grassland in Colorado. Restoration Ecology 17: 818–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00418.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cincotta, R.P., J. Wisnewski, and R. Engelman. 2000. Human population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature 404: 990–992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crowl, T.A., T.O. Crist, R.R. Parmenter, G. Belovsky, and A.E. Lugo. 2008. The spread of invasive species and infectious disease as drivers of ecosystem change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 238–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, P.J., and E.F. Stoermer. 2000. The “Anthropocene.” IGBP Global Change. Newsletter 431: 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio, C.M., and P.M. Vitousek. 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 23: 63–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearborn, D.C., and S. Kark. 2010. Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conservation Biology 24: 432–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukes, J.S., and H.A. Mooney. 1999. Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 135–139.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, E.C., K.K. Goldewijk, S. Seibert, D. Lightman, and N. Ramankutty. 2010. Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19: 589–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, E.C., and N. Ramankutty. 2008. Putting people in the map: Anthropogenic biomes of the world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1890/070062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton, C.S. 1958. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. London: Metheun.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forcella, F., J.T. Wood, and S.P. Dillon. 1986. Characteristics distinguishing invasive weeds within Echium (Bugloss). Weed Research 26: 351–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfray, H.C.J., and M.J. Crawley. 1998. Introductions. In Conservation science and action, ed. W.J. Sutherland, 39–65. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, N.B., S.H. Faeth, N.E. Golubiewski, C.L. Redman, J. Wu, X. Bai, and J.M. Briggs. 2008. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319: 756–760.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grosholz, E.D. 1996. Contrasting rates of spread for introduced species in terrestrial and marine systems. Ecology 77: 1680–1686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, L. 2002. Presence and abundance of red-listed plant species in Swedish forests. Conservation Biology 16: 377–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahs, A.K., and others. 2009. A global synthesis of plant extinction rates in urban areas. Ecology Letters 12: 1165–1173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R.J., and others. 2006. Novel ecosystems: Theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Global Ecology and Biogeography 15: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R.J., E. Higgs, and J.A. Harris. 2009. Novel ecosystems: Implications for conservation and restoration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24: 599–605.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R.J., E.S Higgs, and C.M. Hall. 2013. Novel ecosystems: Intervening in the new ecological world order. Chichester: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118354186.

  • Huntley, B., and T. Webb III. 1989. Migration: Species’ response to climate variation as caused by variations in the earth’s orbit. Journal of Biogeography 16: 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtt, G.C., and others. 2011. Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500–2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands. Climate Change 109: 117–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives, C. D. and others. 2015. Cities are hotspots for threatened species. Global Ecology and Biogeography 25: 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. 2010. Indigenous and community conserved areas: A bold new frontier for conservation. Gland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature. Available at https://www.iucn.org/content/indigenous-and-community-conserved-areas-bold-new-frontier-conservation. Accessed 26 Aug 2019.

  • Jenkyn, T.W. 1854a. Lessons in geology XLVI. Chapter IV. On the effects of organic agents on the Earth’s crust. Popular Educator 4: 139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1854b. Lessons in geology XLIX. Chapter V. On the classification of rocks section IV. On the tertiaries. Popular Educator 4: 312–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R.F. 2001. Synanthropic birds of North America. In Avian ecology in an urbanizing world, ed. J.M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly, 49–67. Norwell: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P., and M. Marvier. 2012. What is conservation science? Bioscience 62: 962–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S.R. 1996. The value of life: Biological diversity and human society. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendeigh, S.C. 1961. Animal ecology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik, I. 1995. On the role of alien species in urban flora and vegetation. In Plant invasions—General aspects and special problems, ed. P. Pysek, K. Prach, M. Rejmánek, and P.M. Wade, 85–103. Amsterdam: SPB Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environmental Pollution 159: 1974–1983.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kueffer, C., and C.C. Daehler. 2009. A habitat-classification framework and typology for understanding, valuing, and managing invasive species. In Management of invasive weeds, ed. Inderjit, 77–101. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, I., R. Brandl, and S. Klotz. 2004. The flora of German cities is naturally species rich. Evolutionary Ecology Research 6: 749–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. 1949. A sand county almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J.M., and C.M. D’Antonio. 2003. Forecasting biological invasions with increasing international trade. Conservation Biology 17: 322–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S.L., and M.A. Maslin. 2015. Defining the Anthropocene. Nature 519: 171–180.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, D.M. 1993. Biological invasions: Lessons for ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 133–137.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, D. M., and others. 2006. Biological invasions: Recommendations for US policy and management. Ecological Applications 16: 2035–2054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlis, G.E., J.E. Force and W.R. Burch. 2008. The human ecosystem Part I: The human ecosystem as an organizing concept in ecosystem management. Society & Natural Resources 10 (4): 347–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackin-Rogalska, R., J. Pinowski, J. Solon, and Z. Wojcik. 1988. Changes in vegetation, avifauna, and small mammals in a suburban habitat. Polish Ecological Studies 14: 293–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvier, M., P. Kareiva, and R. LaLasz. 2019. Conservation in the Anthropocene: Beyond solitude and fragility. The Breakthrough Institute. Available at https://thebreakthrough.org/journal/issue-2/conservation-in-the-anthropocene. Accessed 20 Aug 2019.

  • Mascaro, J., R.F. Hughes, and S.A. Schnitzer. 2012. Novel forests maintain ecosystem processes after the decline of native tree species. Ecological Monographs 82: 221–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J.M. 2001. Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In Avian ecology in an urbanizing world, ed. J.M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly, 19–47. Norwell: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, M.K. 2002. Urbanization, biodiversity and conservation. Bioscience 52: 883–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehmood, S.R., and D.W. Zhang. 2001. A roll call analysis of the endangered species act amendments. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83: 501–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meine, C. 1988. Aldo Leopold: His life and work. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.R., and R.J. Hobbs. 2002. Conservation where people live and work. Conservation Biology 16: 330–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monastersky, R. 2015. The human age. Nature 519: 144–147.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, H.A., and E.E. Cleland. 2001. The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proceedings of the National Science Foundation 98: 5446–5451.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, H.A., R.N. Mack, J.A. McNeely, L.E. Neville, P.J. Schei, and J.K. Waage, eds. 2005. Invasive alien species: A new synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, N.B., and others. 2014. Novel ecosystems in the Anthropocene: A revision of the novel ecosystem concept for pragmatic applications. Ecology and Society 19(2): 12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06192-190212.

  • Moyle, P.H., and T. Light. 1996. Fish invasions in California: Do abiotic factors determine success? Ecology 77: 1666–1670.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA. 2020. ESRL Global Monitoring Division - Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network [WWW Document]. https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/. Accessed 17 Mar 2020.

  • Niemelä, P., and W.J. Mattson. 1996. Invasion of North American forests by European phytophagous insects. Bioscience 46: 741–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S.S. 2015. Incorporating critical elements of city distinctiveness into urban biodiversity conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 24: 683–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, D.P.C. 2004. Selection models of invasive species dynamics. Weed Technology 18: 1236–1239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A., and M.L. Cadenasso. 2006. Advancing urban ecological studies: Frameworks, concepts, and results from the Baltimore Ecosystem Study. Austral Ecology 31: 114–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D. (ed). 2002. Biological invasions: Economic and environmental costs of alien plant, animal, and microbe species. CRC, Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 52: 273–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramalho, C.E., and R.J. Hobbs. 2012. Time for a change: Dynamic urban ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 27: 179–188.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek, M. 1995. What makes a species invasive? In Plant invasions, ed. P. Pysek, K. Prach, M. Rejmánek, and P.M. Wade, 3–13. The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek, M., and D.M. Richardson. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77: 1655–1661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., and others. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461: 472–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, G.M., J.T. Carlton, E.D. Grosholz, and A.H. Hines. 1997. Global invasions of marine and estuarine habitats by nonindigenous species: Mechanisms, extent, and consequences. American Zoologist 37: 621–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax, D.F., J.J. Stachowicz, and S.D. Gaines, eds. 2005. Species invasions: Insights into ecology, evolution, and biogeography. Sunderland: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalepfer, M.A., D.F. Sax, and J.D. Olden. 2011. The potential conservation value of non-native species. Conservation Biology 25: 428–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seastedt, T.R., R.J. Hobbs, and K.N. Suding. 2008. Management of novel ecosystems: Are novel approaches required? Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 6: 547–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seto, K.C., B. Güneralp, and L.R. Hutyra. 2012. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 109: 16083–16088.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharov, A.A., and A.M. Liebhold. 1998. Model of slowing the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) with a barrier zone. Ecological Applications 8: 1170–1179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shigesada, N., K. Kawasaki, and E. Teramoto. 1986. Traveling periodic waves in heterogeneous environments. Theoretical Population Biology 30: 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skellam, J.G. 1951. Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrica 38: 196–218.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, B.A., L. Kutner, and J. Adams. 2000. Precious heritage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, D.L., N.F. Caraco, J.J. Cole, S. Findlay, and M.L. Pace. 1999. Transformation of freshwater ecosystems by bivalves. Bioscience 49: 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy. 2019. Working group on the “Anthropocene” International Union of Geological Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., J. Knops, D. Wedin, P. Reich, M. Ritchie, and E. Siemann. 1997. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277: 1300–1302.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Human Settlements Program. 2012. State of the World’s cities 2012/2013. Prosperity of Cities. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upper Amazon Conservancy. 2019. New Conservation Concession Protects 112,850 acres for Yurua Tribes. Available at https://upperamazon.org/new-conservation-concession-protects-112850-acres-for-yurua-tribes/. Accessed 27 Aug 2019.

  • Veit, R.R., and M.A. Lewis. 1996. Dispersal, population growth, and the Allee effect: Dynamics of the house finch invasion of eastern North America. American Naturalist 148: 255–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veltman, C.J., S. Nee, and M.J. Crawley. 1996. Correlates of introduction success in exotic New Zealand birds. American Naturalist 147: 542–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P.M. 1990. Biological invasions and ecosystem processes: Towards an integration of population biology and ecosystem processes. Oikos 57: 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P.M., H.A. Mooney, J. Lubchenco, and J.M. Melillo. 1997. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277: 494–499.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, C. and others. 2016. The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene. Science 351: aad2622. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2622.

  • Whitney, G.G. 1985. A quantitative analysis of the flora and plant communities of a representative midwestern U.S. town. Urban Ecology 9: 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. 2016a. Half-earth – Our planet’s fight for life. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016b. The global solution to extinction. New York Times, March 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • With, K.A. 1999. Is landscape connectivity necessary and sufficient for wildlife management? In Forest fragmentation: Wildlife and management implications, ed. J.A. Rochelle, L.A. Lehmann, and J. Wisniewski. Boston: Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. The landscape ecology of invasive spread. Conservation Biology 16: 1192–1203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J.A., and F.L. Allen. 1997. Cheatgrass and range science, 1930–1950. Journal of Range Management 50: 530–535.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Au Sable Institute, Mancelona, MI, USA

    Fred Van Dyke

  2. University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

    Rachel L. Lamb

Authors
  1. Fred Van Dyke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rachel L. Lamb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Van Dyke, F., Lamb, R.L. (2020). The Anthropocene: Conservation in a Human-Dominated Nature. In: Conservation Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39534-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation