Abstract
The importance of audit committees increased after a wave of fraud which took place at the turn of the twentieth century. The audit committees were implemented into the corporate governance practice through guidelines, successively adopted in individual EU countries, codes of good practice, as well as legislative changes. The main premise of the legislative changes was the improvement of the process of supervision over the functioning of companies, including in particular public companies. The most important objective of establishing audit committees was to improve the efficiency of supervision of supervisory boards over financial and non-financial reporting of companies through better use of council members’ competences, better organization of its work and strengthening its position vis-à-vis the management board, shareholders and other stakeholders.
Initially, audit committees in Poland were appointed by companies on a voluntary basis, based on the recommendations of good practice codes, i.e., Dobre praktyki w spółkach publicznych 2005 [Good Practices in Public Companies 2005] and Dobre Praktyki Spółek Notowanych na GPW (2007) [Best Practice of WSE Listed Companies (2007)]. In 2009, the provisions of the EU Eighth Directive were implemented into Polish law, and thus the Act of May 7, 2009 on auditors and their self-government, entities authorized to audit financial statements and public supervision introduced the legal obligation to create audit committees also in public companies. The Act specified that the audit committee should consist of at least three board members, at least one of whom should meet the independence criteria and be qualified in the field of accounting or financial auditing. In 2017, the Polish legislator decided, in accordance with the solution provided for in the Directive 2014/56/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, that the size of the board will not be the criterion for appointing an audit committee, but different size criteria for the company. Thus, supervisory boards do not have to appoint an audit committee if the company does not exceed two of the three criteria, i.e., revenues of PLN 34 million, assets worth PLN 17 million and employment of 50 employees.
This article concerns one of the key mechanisms of corporate governance, i.e., the activity of the audit committee. The purpose of this article is to present the evolution of Polish solutions regarding the activities of audit committees, resulting from good practices and statutory regulations, as well as the assessment of their implementation by companies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbott, L., Parker, S., & Peters, G. (2004). Audit committee characteristics and restatements. A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(1), 69–87.
Aldamen, H., Duncan, H., Kelly, S., McNamara, R., & Nagel, S. (2012). Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis. Accounting and Finance, 52(4), 971–1000.
Barka, H. B., & Legendre, F. (2017). Effect of the board of directors and the audit committee on firm performance: A panel data analysis. Journal of Management and Governance, 21(3), 737–755.
Beasley, M. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of directors composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443–465.
Beattie, V., Fearnley, S., & Brandt, R. (2000). Behind the audit report: A descriptive study of discussions and negotiations between auditors and directors. International Journal of Auditing, 4, 177–202.
Bedard, J., Chtourou, S. M., & Courteau, L. (2004). The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(2), 13–35.
Best Practice for GPW Listed Companies 2016. Retrieved from http://www.ecgi.global/sites/default/files/codes/documents/poland_best_practice_for_GPW_listed_companies_2016.pdf
Best Practices in Public Companies in 2002. Retrieved from http://www.ecgi.global/code/best-practices-public-companies-2002
Best Practices in Public Companies 2005. Retrieved from http://www.ecgi.global/code/best-practices-public-companies-2005
Birkett, B. S. (1986). The recent history of corporate audit committees. The Accounting Historians Journal, 13(2), 109–124.
Bosch Report. (1995). Bosch Report: Corporate practices and conduct (3rd ed.). Sydney: Pitman Publishing.
Burke, F. M., Guy, D. M., & Tatum, K. V. (2008). Audit committees: A guide for directors, management, and consultants. Chicago: Wolters Kluwer business.
Carcello, V., Neal, T. L., Palmrose, Z.-V., & Scholz, S. (2011). CEO involvement in selecting board members, audit committee effectiveness, and restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(2), 396–430.
Carson, E. (2002). Factors associated with the development of board sub-committees. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 10(1), 4–18.
Chan, K. C., & Li, J. (2008). Audit committee and firm value: Evidence on outside top executives as expert-independent directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(1), 16–31.
Code of Best Practice for WSE Listed Companies. Retrieved from http://www.ecgi.global/sites/default/files/codes/documents/best_practice_wse_poland_nov2012_en.pdf
Colley, J. L., Jr., Doyle, J. L., Logan, G. W., & Stettinius, W. (2005). What is corporate governance. New York: McGrew-Hill.
Collier, P. (1993). Factors affecting the formation of audit committees in major UK companies. Accounting and Business History, 23(1), 421–430.
Collier, P., & Zaman, M. (2005). Convergence in European corporate governance: The audit committee concept. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(6), 753–768.
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. The financial aspects of corporate governance (Cadbury report). London: Gee and Co.
De Jong, A., De Jong, D. V., Mertens, G., & Wasley, C. E. (2002). The role of self-regulation in corporate governance: Evidence and implications from The Netherlands. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(3), 473–503.
De Zoort, F. T., & Salterio, S. (2001). The effects of corporate governance experience and financial reporting and audit knowledge on audit committee members’ judgments. A Journal of Practice and Theory, 20(2), 31–47.
De Zoort, F. T., Hermanson, D. R., Archambeault, D. S., & Reed, S. A. (2002). Audit committee effectiveness: A synthesis of the empirical audit committee literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 21, 38–75.
Dobija, D. (2010). Komitet audytu a nadzór nad biegłym rewidentem. Praktyka polskich spółek giełdowych, Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 59, 5–14.
Dobija, D. (2011). Doświadczenia funkcjonowania komitetów audytu w Polsce. In D. Dobija, I. Koładkiewicz, I. Cieślak, & K. Klimczak (Eds.), Komitety rad nadzorczych. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwert Business.
Dobija, D. (2013). Exploring audit committee practices: Oversight of financial reporting and external auditors in Poland. Journal of Management and Governance, 19(1), 113–143.
Du Plessis, J. J., & Low, C. K. (2017). Corporate governance codes under the spotlight: International perspectives and critical analysis. Cham: Springer.
Ferguson, N. (2008). The ascent of money: A financial history of the world. New York: Penguin.
Jerzemowska, M., Campbell, K., & Najman, K. (2010). Przyczynek do oceny polskich regulacji nadzoru korporacyjnego. Master of Business Administration, 115(4), 2–15.
Kallamu, B. S., & Saat, N. A. M. (2015). Audit committee attributes and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian finance companies. Asian Review of Accounting, 23(3), 206–231.
Klein, A. (2002). Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 375–400.
Koładkiewicz, I. (2013). Rady nadzorcze – dobre praktyki ładu korporacyjnego: Doświadczenia polskie i zagraniczne. Warszawa: Poltext.
Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit committee financial expertise and internal control: An empirical analysis. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 649–675.
Mangana, M., & Pike, R. (2005). The effect of audit committee shareholding, financial expertize and size on interim financial disclosures. Accounting and Business Research, 35(4), 327–349.
Menon, K., & Williams, J. D. (1994). The use of audit committees for monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 13(2), 121–139.
Oplustil, K. (2010). Instrumenty nadzoru korporacyjnego (corporate governance) w spółce akcyjnej. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Pincus, K., Rusbarsky, M., & Wang, J. (1989). Voluntary formation on corporate audit committees among NASDAQ firms. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 8(4), 239–265.
Saleh, N. M., Iskandar, T. M., & Rahmat, M. M. (2007). Audit committee characteristics and earnings management: Evidence from Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting, 15(2), 147–163.
Samaha, K., Khlif, H., & Hussainey, K. (2015). The impact of board and audit committee characteristics on voluntary disclosure: A meta-analysis. The Journal of International Accounting, Auditing, and Taxation, 24, 13–28.
Spira, L. F. (2003). Audit committees: Begging the question? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 180–187.
Sultana, N. (2015). Audit committee characteristics and accounting conservatism. International Journal of Auditing, 19(2), 88–102.
Ustawa z dnia 7 maja 2009 r. o biegłych rewidentach i ich samorządzie, podmiotach uprawnionych do badania sprawozdań finansowych oraz o nadzorze publicznym, Dz. U. z 2009 r., nr 77, poz. 649 ze zm.
Ustawa z dnia 11 maja 2017 o biegłych rewidentach, firmach audytorskich oraz nadzorze publicznym, Dz. U. z 2017, nr 0, poz. 1089.
Verschoor, C. C. (1990). MiniScribe: A new example of audit committee ineffectiveness. Internal Auditing, 5(4), 13–19.
Winter, J., Hopt, K. J., Rickford, J., Garrido Garcia, J. M., Rossi, G., Schans, C. J., & Simon, J. (2002). Report of the high level group of company law experts on a modern regulatory framework for company law in Europe, Brussels, 4 November.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adamska, A., Bohdanowicz, L., Gad, J. (2020). Audit Committees in Supervisory Boards of Polish Public Companies: Theory, Practice and Regulations. In: Aluchna, M., Idowu, S.O., Tkachenko, I. (eds) Corporate Governance in Central Europe and Russia. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39504-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39504-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39503-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39504-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)