Advertisement

Public Access in Decline

Chapter
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

Public Access Television in the United States has undergone a serious decline. This chapter introduces the conflict between two ways of explaining the decline of public access: that of technological utopians who believe that technology itself promotes democracy and that of social constructionism and critical theorists who look first to the social shaping of technologies as embedded in relations of power and domination. The first view is important because it is often appealed to by policymakers and municipal leaders. I criticize the technological utopian view for its inherent determinism, its explanatory insufficiency and its political naivety. Technologies alone do not determine the course of social change. I briefly outline the alternative view, and later outline the plan of the book.

Bibliography

  1. Agger, Ben. 2012. Oversharing: Presentations of the Self in the Internet Age. Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Aufderheide, Patricia. 2000. The Daily Planet: A Critic on the Capitalist Culture Beat. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barber, Benjamin. 2006. Pangloss, Pandora or Jefferson? Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong Democracy. In The New Media Theory Reader, ed. Robert Hassan and Julien Thomas, 188–202. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  5. Bijker, Wiebe E., Thomas P. Hughes, and Trevor Pinch. 1987. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Castells, Manuel. 2009. The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture Volume I. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Coser, Louis. 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. ———. September 1957. Social Conflict and the Theory of Social Change. The British Journal of Sociology 8 (3): 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delong, Jeff. 2010. Support, Funding Dry up for Community Access TV. USA Today, November 4. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-11-04-accesstv04_ST_N.htm.
  10. Engelman, Ralph. 1996. Public Radio and Television in America: A Political History, 12–13. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Feenberg, Andrew. 2004. Democratic Rationalization: Technology Power and Freedom. In Readings in the Philosophy of Technology, ed. David M. Kaplan, 209–222. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  12. Fuller, Linda. 1994. Community Television in the United States: A Sourcebook on Public Educational and Governmental Access. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gimmler, Antje. 2001. Deliberative Democracy, the Public Sphere and the Internet. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (4): 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Habermas, Jurgen. 1971. Science and Technology as Ideology. In Toward a Rational Society, 81–122. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 1981. Theory of Communicative Action, 2 vols, especially Book 1 Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Keane, John. 1991. The Media and Democracy. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kellner, Douglas. 1990. Television and the Crisis of Democracy. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kirkhope, Timothy. 2012. How the Internet Is Changing Democracy. The Independent, December 12. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/how-the-internet-is-transforming-democracy-8411474.html.
  19. Kirkpatrick, Bill. 2002. Rethinking ‘Access’ Cultural Barriers to Public Access Television. Community Media Review 25 (2): 20–23.Google Scholar
  20. Lasch, Christopher. 1977. Forward to David Noble. In America by Design: Science Technology and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Levitsky, Steven, and María Victoria Murillo. Building Institutions on Weak Foundations: Lessons from Latin America. http://www.isp.org.pl/uploads/filemanager/BuildingInstitutionsonWeakFoundationLessonsfromLatinAmericaLevitskyMurillo.pdf.
  22. Leys, Colin. 1999. The Public Sphere and the Media: Market Supremacy Versus Democracy. Socialist Register: 314–335.Google Scholar
  23. Linder, Laura. 1999. Public Access Television: America’s Electronic Soapbox. New York: Prager.Google Scholar
  24. McChesney, Robert W. 2013. Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet Against Democracy. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  25. Noble, David. 1977. America by Design: Science Technology and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sanders, Lindsey. Cracking the Case of Disappearing Public Access Channels. The Save the News Blog. http://www.savethenews.org/blog/11/05/11/cracking-case-disappearing-public-access-channels.
  27. Spigel, Lynn, and Michael Curtin, eds. 1997. The Revolution Wasn’t Televised: Sixties Television and Social Conflict. Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. The Buske Group. 2011. Analysis of Recent Peg Access Center Closures, Funding Cutbacks and Related Threats. Prepared for Alliance for Communications Democracy, April 8.Google Scholar
  29. Tracy, Michael. 1998. Decline and Fall of Public Service Broadcasting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Turner, Fred. 2006. From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Williams, Raymond. 2001. Television: Technology and Cultural Form. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations