Risk Assessment Tools and Quality Methods

Part of the Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering book series (SPRTRCIENG)


Nowadays the risk management is one of the most important activities at every organization. Whether it is a process (e.g. natural disaster control) or product (e.g. a drone, which can be used for detection or rescue processes) it is necessary to discover and critical analyze the all potential risks. The risk assessment process can be divided into three determined steps: risk identification, risk analysis, risk evaluation. All process steps must be performed using the best and most suitable method so we can be sure of achieving the best results. These methods are most effective if we have enough experience and data from the past. Therefore it is important to present the methods which can be used for data collection and data analysis. We can not eliminate the risk factors in the risk assessment process but it helps us to be able to quantify and to reduce their effect with preventive actions. Our goal is to summarize these methods and techniques which can be used to analyze and evaluate risks based on our experience.


Risk assessment Quality tools Risk analysis Evaluating methods 


  1. Baynal, K., Sari, T., & Akpinar, B. (2018). Risk management in automotive manufacturing process based on FMEA and grey relation a analysis: A casestudy. APEM Journal Advances in Production Engineering and Management, 13, 69–80.Google Scholar
  2. Ben-Daya, M., Duffuaa, S. O., Raouf, A., Knezevic, J., & Ait-Kadi, D. (2009). Handbook of maintenance management and engineering (Springer, Berlin, pp. 75–90).Google Scholar
  3. Dunjó, J., Fthenakis, V., Vílchez, J. A., & Arnaldos, J. (2010). Hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis. A literature review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 173, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. FMEA Handbook. (2017). AIAG-VDA Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) handbook (1st ed.).Google Scholar
  5. IEC 31010:2019 Risk management—Risk assessment techniques.Google Scholar
  6. IEC 61882:2016 Hazard and operability studies (HAZOP studies). Application guide.Google Scholar
  7. ISO/IEC Guide 73 Risk management—Vocabulary.Google Scholar
  8. ISO 31000:2018 Risk management—Guidelines.Google Scholar
  9. Juran, J. M., & De Fao, J. A. (2010). Jurans’s quality handbook. The complete guide to performance excellence (6th ed., McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC).Google Scholar
  10. Kletz, T. A. (2018). Hazop & Hazan identifying and assessing process industry hazards (4th ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 9–36).Google Scholar
  11. Klüppelberg, C., Straub, D., & Welpe, I. M. (2014). Risk—A multidisciplinary introduction. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Modarres, M. (2016). Risk analysis in engineering. Techniques, tools, and trends (CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, NW pp. 24–28, pp. 46–49).Google Scholar
  13. Tague, N. R. (2015). The quality toolbox (2nd ed.). Milwaukee, Wisconsin: ASQ Quality Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bánki Donát Faculty of Mechanical and Safety EngineeringÓbuda UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations