Abstract
Governments typically store large amounts of personal information on their citizens, such as a home address, marital status, and occupation, to offer public services. Because governments consist of various governmental agencies, multiple copies of this data often exist. This raises concerns regarding data consistency, privacy, and access control, especially under recent legal frameworks such as GDPR. To solve these problems, and to give citizens true control over their data, we explore an approach using the decentralised Solid ecosystem, which enables citizens to maintain their data in personal data pods. We have applied this approach to two high-impact use cases, where citizen information is stored in personal data pods, and both public and private organisations are selectively granted access. Our findings indicate that Solid allows reshaping the relationship between citizens, their personal data, and the applications they use in the public and private sector. We strongly believe that the insights from this Flemish Solid Pilot can speed up the process for public administrations and private organisations that want to put the users in control of their data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
Solid uses the WebID-OIDC specification for authentication: https://github.com/solid/webid-oidc-spec.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
References
Staatsblad, B.: Wijzigingen met betrekking tot de onderzoeksmiddelen van de administratie (2011). https://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi_loi/change_lg.pl?language=nl&la=N&table_name=wet&cn=2011041406. Accessed 09 July 2019
Berners-Lee, T., Verborgh, R.: Welcome to Solid (2019). https://rubenverborgh.github.io/Solid-DeSemWeb-2018/#title. Accessed 09 July 2019
Buyle, R., et al.: Semantics in the wild: a digital assistant for Flemish citizens. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 1–6. ACM (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3209415.3209421
Cruellas, J.C., Karlinger, G., Pinkas, D., Ross, J.: XML advanced electronic signatures (XAdES). W3C Recommendation (2003). http://www.w3.org/TR/XAdES. Accessed 09 July 2019
Decker, C., Wattenhofer, R.: Information propagation in the bitcoin network. In: IEEE P2P 2013 Proceedings, pp. 1–10. IEEE, September 2013
de Montjoye, Y.A., Wang, S.S., Pentland, A., Anh, D.T.T., Datta, A.: On the trusted use of large-scale personal data. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 35(4), 5–8 (2012)
Esposito, C., De Santis, A., Tortora, G., Chang, H., Choo, K.K.R.: Blockchain: a panacea for healthcare cloud-based data security and privacy? IEEE Cloud Comput. 5(1), 31–37 (2018)
European Commission: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46. Official J. Eur. Union (OJ) 59(1–88), 294 (2016)
European Commission. Guidelines on Consent under Regulation 2016/679 Luxembourg: Publications Office (2018). https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/item-detail.cfm?item_id=623051. Accessed 09 July 2019
European Commission. It’s your data – take control. Luxembourg: Publications Office (2018). https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/data-protection-overview-citizens_en.pdf. Accessed 09 July 2019
Fatema, K., Hadziselimovic, E., Pandit, H.J., Debruyne, C., Lewis, D., O’Sullivan, D.: Compliance through informed consent: semantic based consent permission and data management model. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Society, Privacy and the Semantic Web - Policy and Technology (PrivOn2017), Vienna, Austria (2017)
Harrison, T.M., Pardo, T.A., Cook, M.: Creating open government ecosystems: a research and development agenda. Future Internet 4(4), 900–928 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi4040900. MDPI AG
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A.: Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inf. Syst. Manag. 29(4), 258–268 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
Jia, J., Jin, G.Z., Wagman, L.: The short-run effects of GDPR on technology venture investment (No. w25248). Natl. Bureau Econ. Res. (2018). https://doi.org/10.3386/w25248
Mansour, E., et al.: A demonstration of the solid platform for social web applications. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, pp. 223–226. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2872518.2890529
Mun, M., et al.: Personal data vaults: a locus of control for personal data streams. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies, p. 17. ACM (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1921168.1921191
Narayanan, A., Toubiana, V., Barocas, S., Nissenbaum, H., Boneh, D.: A critical look at decentralized personal data architectures. arXiv preprint arXiv:1202.4503 (2012)
Pollock, R.: Building the (Open) Data Ecosystem, 11 March 2011. http://blog.okfn.org/2011/03/31/building-the-open-data-ecosystem/. Accessed 9 July 2019
Solid. Welcome to Solid (2019). https://solid.inrupt.com/. Accessed 09 July 2019
Van Kleek, M., OHara, K.: The future of social is personal: the potential of the personal data store. In: Miorandi, D., Maltese, V., Rovatsos, M., Nijholt, A., Stewart, J. (eds.) Social Collective Intelligence. CSS, pp. 125–158. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08681-1_7
Verborgh, R.: Ruben Verborgh on data & privacy. Imec Mag. (2019). https://www.imec-int.com/en/imec-magazine/imec-magazine-january-2019/back-to-the-future-how-we-will-regain-control-of-our-personal-data. Accessed 09 July 2019
Vescovi, M., Perentis, C., Leonardi, C., Lepri, B., Moiso, C.: My data store: toward user awareness and control on personal data. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication, pp. 179–182. ACM (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2638728.2638745
Whitley, E.A.: Informational privacy, consent and the “control” of personal data. Inf. Secur. Tech. Rep. 14(3), 154–159 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istr.2009.10.001
Yeung, C.M.A., Liccardi, I., Lu, K., Seneviratne, O., Berners-Lee, T.: Decentralization: the future of online social networking. In: W3C Workshop on the Future of Social Networking Position Papers, vol. 2, pp. 2–7 (2009)
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Davis, C.: Innovation with open data: essential elements of open data ecosystems. Inf. Polity 19(1, 2), 17–33 (2014)
Zyskind, G., Nathan, O.: Decentralizing privacy: using blockchain to protect personal data. In: 2015 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops, pp. 180–184. IEEE (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/spw.2015.27
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Buyle, R. et al. (2020). Streamlining Governmental Processes by Putting Citizens in Control of Their Personal Data. In: Chugunov, A., Khodachek, I., Misnikov, Y., Trutnev, D. (eds) Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. EGOSE 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1135. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39296-3_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39296-3_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39295-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39296-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)