Skip to main content

Use of Surveytainment Elements in Knowledge-Assessment Tests: An Abstract

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Marketing Opportunities and Challenges in a Changing Global Marketplace (AMSAC 2019)

Abstract

Psychologists and pedagogy researchers suggest the way people process information has changed dramatically in recent decades. Multitasking habits may be the primary cause for some college students’ self-reports about boredom in face-to-face classes (Barnes et al. 2007; Robinson and Stubberud 2012). Similarly, students may struggle when asked to respond to a knowledge-assessment test (Beaton 2017; Castillo 2017; Zwarun and Hall 2014).

Recent studies have found that attention focus is closely linked with mood (Kostyk et al. 2019). People generally prioritize affect regulation—which requires attention allocation and cognitive processing—over other mental processing (Gross 1998; Muraven and Baumeister 2000). Mental resource limitations and processing interdependencies cause affect regulation to impair memory and performance on subsequent cognitive tasks (e.g., anagram solving) (Amos et al. Keneson 2014; Bauer and Baumeister 2016; Muraven and Baumeister 2000).

Students’ emotions and mood fluctuate routinely. Responding to a knowledge-assessment test demands very high attentional control that drains cognitive resources (Ochsner and Gross 2005). Concurrently, most students are likely to experience negative affect when facing a knowledge-assessment test. Attempting to regulate this negative affect will reduce the attention they allocate to answering test questions unless that affect is alleviated.

Prior research suggests interruptions can modify emotional valences towards ongoing actions and induce better consumer outcomes in some contexts (Mandler 1990a, b; Nelson and Meyvis 2008; Nelson et al. 2009). Similarly, taking brief yet entertaining breaks from answering knowledge-assessment questions may increase students’ enjoyment of and attention to tests.

‘Surveytainment’ is the interactive and non-interactive questionnaire elements meant to improve survey respondents’ mood and consequently enhance their attentiveness and questionnaire-related attitudes (Kostyk et al. 2019). Knowledge-assessment tests are similar to questionnaires and might elicit stronger negative affect from students. Therefore, students—through better performance—and subsequently instructors—through better student evaluations of teaching—may benefit from including surveytainment elements in knowledge-assessment tests.

Results of a pretest and proposed empirical research agenda are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alena Kostyk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kostyk, A., Zhou, W., Hyman, M.R. (2020). Use of Surveytainment Elements in Knowledge-Assessment Tests: An Abstract. In: Wu, S., Pantoja, F., Krey, N. (eds) Marketing Opportunities and Challenges in a Changing Global Marketplace. AMSAC 2019. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39165-2_178

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics