Skip to main content

Environmental Impact Assessment of Farming with Combined Methods of Life Cycle Assessment and Farm Carbon Calculator


Nowadays, farming is one of the major sources of environmental impacts in the world. This research developed an approach of combining the life cycle assessment (LCA) and Farm Carbon Calculator (FCC) to assess the environmental impact of farming. The LCA is a general method covering a broad spectrum of environmental impact assessment and the FCC is a farming specific method focusing on carbon emission and sequestration. The approach is applied in an organic vegetable farm as an application scenario. In this chapter, the scope of the investigation is presented first, followed by assessing the environmental impact of farming by utilizing the LCA and FCC methods respectively. The assessments were conducted regarding key aspects of farming, including fuel/energy consumption, fertility improvement, materials, distribution, and waste/disposals. According to the assessment results, suggestions for reducing the environmental impact of farming are proposed. The outcome of the investigation proved the correctness and the compensative advantages of the approach.


  • Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA)
  • Carbon
  • Greenhouse gas emissions
  • Organic farming
  • Environmental impact calculation
  • Vegetable farm

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39149-2_12
  • Chapter length: 22 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-39149-2
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 12.1
Fig. 12.2
Fig. 12.3
Fig. 12.4
Fig. 12.5
Fig. 12.6
Fig. 12.7
Fig. 12.8
Fig. 12.9
Fig. 12.10
Fig. 12.11



Farm Carbon Calculator


Greenhouse Gases


Life Cycle Assessment


Life Cycle Impact Assessment


Life Cycle Inventory


Scilly Organics


Soil Organic Matter


  • Brentrup, F., Hoxha, A., & Christense, B. (2016). Carbon footprint analysis of mineral fertilizer production in Europe and other world regions, In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment of Food, October 2016, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, M. (2013). Life Cycle Assessment: A review of the methodology and its application to sustainability. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 2, 1–5.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • de Backer, E., Aertsens, J., Vergucht, S., & Steurbaut, W. (2009). Assessing the ecological soundness of organic and conventional agriculture by means of life cycle assessment (LCA): A case study of leek production. British Food Journal, 111(10), 1028–1061.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Deimling, S., Shonfield P., & Bos U. (2008). LCA and carbon footprints in agro-food: From theory to implementation in the food industry. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on LCA in the Agri-Food Sector. Zurich, 12–14 Nov 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defra. (2017). 2017 GHG conversion factors. Retrieved August 9, from

  • Defra. (2009). Research project final report ‘A preliminary assessment of the greenhouse gases associated with growing media materials’.

  • EN ISO 14040. (2006). Environmental management-Life cycle assessment-Principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • EN ISO 14044. (2006). Environmental management-Life cycle assessment-Requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. (2010). International reference life cycle data system (ILCD) handbook–General guide for life cycle assessment–Detailed guidance. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Public Health and Agriculture Consortium (EPHAC) position on. (2011). The future of the common agricultural policy. Retrieved June 04, 2018, from

  • FAO. (2012). Road to Rio: Improving energy use key challenge for world’s food systems. Retrieved July 24, 2018, from

  • FCC. (n.d). Farm Carbon Calculator. Retrieved August 10, 2018, from

  • FCC References. (n.d).

  • Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., et al. (2011). Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478(7369), 337.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, C., Green, K., Bleda, M., Devick, P., Evans, B., Flynn A., et al. (2006). Environmental impacts of food production and consumption: A report to the department of environment, food and rural affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht, R., Jungbluth, N., Althaus, H. J., Doka, G., Heck, T., Hellweg, S., et al. (2007). Overview and methodology. Ecoinvent report No. 1. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galan, M. B., Peschard, D., & Boizard, H. (2007). ISO 14 001 at the farm level: Analysis of five methods for evaluating the environmental impact of agricultural practices. Journal of Environmental Management, 82(3), 341–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., De Schryver, A., Struijs, J., & van Zelm, R. (2009). ReCiPe 2008: A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. VROM–Ruimte en Milieu, Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer.

  • Hammond, G., & Jones, C. (2011). Inventory of energy and carbon v2.0. University of Bath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokazono, S., & Hayashi, K. (2012). Variability in environmental impacts during conversion from conventional to organic farming: a comparison among three rice production systems in Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 28, 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts, M. A. J., Steinmann, Z. J. N., Elshout, P. M. F., Stam, G., Verones, F., Vieira, M. D. M., et al. (2016). ReCiPe2016: A harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. RIVM Report 2016-0104. Bilthoven, The Netherlands. Retrieved September 3, 2018, from

  • Jeswani, H. K., Azapagic, A., Schepelmann, P., & Ritthoff, M. (2010). Options for broadening and deepening the LCA approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(2), 120–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, M. T., Meyer-Aurich, A., Olesen, J. E., Chirinda, N., & Hermansen, J. E. (2013). Carbon footprints of crops from organic and conventional arable crop rotations–using a life cycle assessment approach. Journal of Cleaner Production (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R. (2009). The potential for soil carbon sequestration. International Food and Policy Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levasseur, A., Lesage, P., Margni, M., & Samson, R. (2012). Biogenic carbon and temporary storage addressed with dynamic life cycle assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17(1), 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillywhite, R., Chandler, D., Grant, W., Lewis, K., Firth, C., Schmutz, U., et al. (2007). Environmental Footprint and Sustainability of Horticulture (including Potatoes)–A Comparison with other Agricultural Sectors. Final report produced for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi, A., Rafiee, S., Jafari, A., Dalgaard, T., Knudsen, M. T., Keyhani, A., et al. (2013). Potential greenhouse gas emission reductions in soybean farming: A combined use of Life Cycle Assessment and Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 54(1), 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouron, P., et al. (2012). Sustainability assessment of crop protection systems: SustainOS methodology and its application for apple orchards. Agricultural Systems, 113, 1–15.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nemecek, T., Huguenin-Elie, O., Dubois, D., Gaillard, G., Schaller, B., & Chervet, A. (2011). Life cycle assessment of Swiss farming systems: II. Extensive and intensive production. Agricultural Systems, 104(3), 233–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payraudeau, S., & van der Werf, H. M. G. (2005). Environmental impact assessment for a farming region: a review of methods. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 107(1), 1–19.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • PRé. (2015). SimaPro database manual (pp. 1–78). Amersfoort, The Netherlands: PRé Consultants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reganold, J. P., Glover, J. D., Andrews, P. K., & Hinman, H. R. (2001). Sustainability of three apple production systems. Nature, 410, 926–930.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B., Strømman, A. H., & Hertwich, E. G. (2012). Environmental damage assessment of carbon capture and storage. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16(3), 407–419.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P., et al. (2008) Cool Farming. Report, Greenpeace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Association. (2011). Carbon footprinting on farms. Information Sheet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichnothe, H., Hospido, A., & Azapagic, A. (2008). Carbon footprint estimation of food production systems: The importance of considering methane and nitrous oxide. Aspects of Applied Biology, 87, 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidåker, P., Mattsson, B., & Jönsson, H. (2007). Environmental impact of wheat production using human urine and mineral fertilisers–A scenario study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(1), 52–62.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Virtanen, Y., Kurppa, S., Saarinen, M., Katajajuuri, J. M., Usva, K., Mäenpää, I., et al. (2011). Carbon footprint of food–approaches from national input–output statistics and a LCA of a food portion. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(16), 1849–1856.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • van der Werf, H. M. G., & Petit, J. (2002). Evaluation of the environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: A comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 93(1–3), 131–145.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • van Zeijts, H., Leneman, H., & Sleeswijk, A. W. (1999). Fitting fertilisation in LCA: Allocation to crops in a cropping plan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 7(1), 69–74.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors acknowledge the financial supports received from the European Commission’s FP7 Environment programme for myEcoCost project (Grant number 308530) and H2020 Circular Economy program for CIRC4Life project (Grant agreement number 776503). The authors thank Dr Giuseppe Salvia, former research fellow working at the Advanced Design and Manufacturing Engineering Centre of Nottingham Trent University, for his contribution to the research reported in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daizhong Su .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Su, D., Smith, J., Wu, Y., Ren, Z. (2020). Environmental Impact Assessment of Farming with Combined Methods of Life Cycle Assessment and Farm Carbon Calculator. In: Su, D. (eds) Sustainable Product Development. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39148-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39149-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)