Skip to main content

Stochastic Mechanisms of Information Flow in Phosphate Economy of Escherichia coli

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Numerical Computations: Theory and Algorithms (NUMTA 2019)

Abstract

In previous work, we have presented a computational model and experimental results that quantify the dynamic mechanisms of auto-regulation in E. coli in response to varying external phosphate levels. In a cycle of deterministic ODE simulations and experimental verification, our model predicts and explores phenotypes with various modifications at the genetic level that can optimise inorganic phosphate intake. Here, we extend our analysis with extensive stochastic simulations at a single-cell level so that noise due to small numbers of certain molecules, e.g., genetic material, can be better observed. For the simulations, we resort to a conservative extension of Gillespie’s stochastic simulation algorithm that can be used to quantify the information flow in the biochemical system. Besides the common time series analysis, we present a dynamic visualisation of the time evolution of the model mechanisms in the form of a video, which is of independent interest. We argue that our stochastic analysis of information flow provides insights for designing more stable synthetic applications that are not affected by noise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an exposure to the changes in system fluxes throughout the simulation, we refer to the online video of the complete simulation: https://youtu.be/PiKRCYyR57k.

References

  1. Uluşeker, C., Torres-Bacete, J., Garcia, J.L., Hancyzc, M.M., Nogales, J., Kahramanoğulları, O.: Quantifying dynamic mechanisms of auto-regulation in Escherichia coli with synthetic promoter in response to varying external phosphate levels. Sci. Rep. 9, 2076 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Elowitz, M.B., Levine, A.J., Siggia, E.D., Swain, P.S.: Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297(5584), 1183–1186 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Raj, A., van Oudenaarden, A.: Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences. Cell 135(2), 216–226 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bandiera, L., Furini, S., Giordano, E.: Phenotypic variability in synthetic biology applications: dealing with noise in microbial gene expression. Front Microbiol. 7, 479 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu, J., Xiao, J., Ren, X., Lao, K., Xie, X.S.: Probing gene expression in live cells, one protein molecule at a time. Science 311(5767), 1600–1603 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McAdams, H.H., Arkin, A.: Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. PNAS 94(3), 814–819 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gillespie, D.T.: Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J. Phys. Chem. 81(25), 2340–2361 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kahramanoğulları, O., Lynch, J.: Stochastic flux analysis of chemical reaction networks. BMC Syst. Biol. 7, 133 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahramanoğulları, O.: Quantifying information flow in chemical reaction networks. In: Figueiredo, D., Martín-Vide, C., Pratas, D., Vega-Rodríguez, M.A. (eds.) AlCoB 2017. LNCS, vol. 10252, pp. 155–166. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58163-7_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris, R.M., Webb, D.C., Howitt, S.M., Cox, G.B.: Characterization of PitA and PitB from Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 183, 5008–5014 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shannon, P., et al.: Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13(11), 2498–504 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miyashiro, T., Goulian, M.: High stimulus unmasks positive feedback in an autoregulated bacterial signaling circuit. PNAS 105, 17457–17462 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tiwari, A., et al.: Bistable responses in bacterial genetic networks: designs and dynamical consequences. Math. Biosci. 231(1), 76–89 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Shinar, G., Milo, R., Matinez, M.R., Alon, U.: Input output robustness in simple bacterial signaling systems. PNAS 104(50), 19931–19935 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mukhopadhyay, A., Gao, R., Lynn, D.G.: Integrating input from multiple signals: the VirA/VirG two-component system of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Chembiochem 5, 1535–1542 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hawley, D.K., McClure, W.R.: Compilation and analysis of Escherichia coli promoter DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 11(8), 2237–2255 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jensen, P.R., Hammer, K.: The sequence of spacers between the consensus sequences modulates the strength of prokaryotic promoters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64(1), 82–87 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jensen, P.R., Hammer, K.: Artificial promoters for metabolic optimization. Biotechnology Bioeng. 58(2–3), 191–195 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leveau, J.H., Lindow, S.E.: Predictive and interpretive simulation of green fluorescent protein expression in reporter bacteria. J. Bacteriol 183(23), 6752–6762 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kahramanoğulları, O.: On quantitative comparison of chemical reaction network models. In: Proceedings of PERR 2019 3rd Workshop on Program Equivalence and Relational Reasoning, volume 296 of EPTC, pp. 14–27 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the grant agreement No 686585 – LIAR, Living Architecture.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozan Kahramanoğulları .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

The CRN in [1] that models the auto-regulation mechanism of E. coli in response to varying external phosphate concentrations. The time unit of the reactions is in seconds. The fold-change fc factor in reactions r01 and r03 model the variations in external \(P_i\) concentration. The \(\texttt {fc} = 1.0\) value corresponds to the starvation condition and a lower \(\texttt {fc}\) value corresponds to a higher external \(P_i\) concentration. The binding factor bf in reactions r16, r18 and unbinding factor uf in reactions r17, r19 are scalar factors. They represent the affinity of the active transcription factor to the promoter region. In the control model, the default values of \(\texttt {bf} = 1.0\) and \(\texttt {uf} = 1.0\) are used.

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kahramanoğulları, O., Uluşeker, C., Hancyzc, M.M. (2020). Stochastic Mechanisms of Information Flow in Phosphate Economy of Escherichia coli. In: Sergeyev, Y., Kvasov, D. (eds) Numerical Computations: Theory and Algorithms. NUMTA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11973. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39081-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39081-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39080-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39081-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics