Advertisement

Conclusion: The Sustainable Development Goals and Capability and Human Security Analysis

Chapter

Abstract

The Conclusion chapter discusses the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in relation to human capability and human security analyses. It documents strengths of the SDGs, areas of common ground, disparities and possible future trajectories. The processes leading to the SDGs were comparatively speaking notably inclusive, which has provided much more widespread awareness and support. In declared content, too, the SDGs are in several ways potentially transformative: applying to all countries, multidimensional, linking issues of sustainability and development. They include much of what is desirable from capability and human security perspectives and are more encompassing than what capability scholars have offered in practical assessments of human well-being. They offer policy spaces and processes that can facilitate progress on various fronts. However, they contain important limitations and dangers, including in regard to the continuing commitment to unending growth, the relations between the goals, targets and indicators, the power structures that lie behind these, and how the goals will be interpreted and used at national and local levels. Capabilities analysis and human development and human security approaches can play essential roles of critique and enrichment, including questioning the belief in unending growth and illuminating the variety of understandings of development and of a meaningful well-considered human life. We suggest that the SDGs should be used as a channel for insights from these partner approaches, and as stimuli for the approaches’ deepening and elaboration in regard to sustainability.

References

  1. Anand, P. (2018). Cities and the Capability Approach. In F. Comim, S. Fennell, & P. Anand (Eds.), New Frontiers of the Capability Approach (pp. 519–546). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Biggeri, M., & Ferrannini, A. (2014). Sustainable Human Development: A New Territorial and People-centred Perspective. Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Caballero, P. (2016). A Short History of the SDGs. April 29, at: deliver2030.org.
  4. Crabtree, A. (2013). Sustainable Development: Does the Capability Approach Have Anything to Offer? Outlining a Legitimate Freedom Approach. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(1), 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crocker, D. A. (2008). Ethics of Global Development: Agency, Capability, and Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crocker, D. A. (2019a). From Agency to Perfectionist Liberalism. In L. Keleher & S. Kosko (Eds.), Agency and Democracy in Development Ethics (pp. 385–415). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crocker, D. A. (2019b). Perfectionist Liberalism and Democracy. In L. Keleher & S. Kosko (Eds.), Agency and Democracy in Development Ethics (pp. 416–454). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deneulin, S. (2008). Beyond Individual Freedom and Agency: Structures of Living Together in Sen’s Capability Approach to Development. In S. Alkire, F. Comim, & M. Qizilbash (Eds.), The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Application (pp. 105–124). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492587.
  9. Deneulin, S. (2014). Creating More Just Cities: The Right to the City and Capability Approach Combined. Bath Papers in International Development and Wellbeing. (No. 32)Google Scholar
  10. Dodds, F., Laguna-Celis, J., & Thompson, L. (2014). From Rio+20 to a New Development Agenda. Abingdon: Routledge/Earthscan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dodds, F., Donoghue, D., & Roesch, J. L. (2017). Negotiating the SDGs. Abingdon: Routledge/Earthscan.Google Scholar
  12. Donoghue, D. (2016). My Perspective on the SDG Negotiations. At: deliver2030.org, May 2016.
  13. Fukuda-Parr, S. (2016). From the Millennium Development Goals to the Sustainable Development Goals: Shifts in Purpose, Concept, and Politics of Global Goal Setting for Development. Gender & Development, 24(1), 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fukuda-Parr, S., & McNeill, D. (Eds.) (2019). Special issue of Global Policy, 2019 (vol.9, S1). https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/journal-issue/special-issue-knowledge-and-politics-setting-and-measuring-sdgs
  15. Garza-Vázquez, O., & Deneulin, S. (2019). The Capability Approach: Ethics and socio-economic development. In J. Drydyk & L. Keleher (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Development Ethics (First ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Routledge, an imprint of Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  16. Gasper, D. (2014a). Human Security Analysis as a Framework for Value-Oriented Governance: The Example of Climate Change. International Journal of Social Quality, 4(2), 6–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gasper, D. (2014b). Future Global Ethics: Environmental Change, Embedded Ethics, Evolving Human Identity. Journal of Global Ethics, 10(2), 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gasper, D. (2019). Insouciance, Indifference and Any Inspiration in the Face of Emergent Global Crises? In B. Jessop & K. Knio (Eds.), The Pedagogy of Economic, Political and Social Crises (pp. 209–228). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Gasper, D., & Comim, F. (2019). Public Goods and Public Spirit – Reflections on and Beyond Nussbaum’s Political Emotions. In L. Keleher & S. Kosko, Agency and Democracy in Development Ethics (pp. 75–105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gellers, J. C. (2016). Crowdsourcing Global Governance: Sustainable Development Goals, Civil Society, and the Pursuit of Democratic Legitimacy. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gomez, O. A., Gasper, D., & Mine Y. (2013). Good Practices in Addressing Human Security Through National Human Development Reports. Report for UNDP Human Development Report Office and UN Trust Fund for Human Security. HDRO Occasional Paper: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/good_practices.pdf.
  22. Gomez, O. A., Gasper, D., & Mine, Y. (2016). Moving Development and Security Narratives a Step Further: Human Security in the Human Development Reports. Journal of Development Studies, 52(1), 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Held, D., Roger, C., & Nag, E.-M. (Eds.). (2013). Climate Governance in the Developing World. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Holland, B. (2014). Allocating the Earth: A Distributional Framework for Protecting Capabilities in Environmental Law and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Honneth, A. (1996). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kamau, M., Chasek, P., & O’Connor, D. (2018). Transforming Multilateral Diplomacy: The Inside Story of the Sustainable Development Goals. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kjørven, O. (2016). The Unlikely Journey to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. At: deliver2030.org, Feb. 15.
  28. Köhler, G., Gasper, D., Jolly, R., & Simane, M. (2012). Human Security and the Next Generation of Comprehensive Development Goals. Journal of Human Security Studies, 1(2), 75–79.Google Scholar
  29. Leßmann, O. (2011). Sustainability as a Challenge to the Capability Approach. Sustainable Development: Capabilities, Needs, and Well-being, 9(3), 43–61.Google Scholar
  30. Nussbaum, M. C. (2013). Political Emotions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. O’Brien, K., St. Clair, A. L., & Kristoffersen, B. (Eds.). (2010). Climate Change, Ethics and Human Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ramírez, V. (2016). CCTs Through a Wellbeing Lens: The Importance of the Relationship Between Front-line Officers and Participants in the Oportunidades/Prospera programme in Mexico. Social Policy and Society, 15(3), 451–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Redclift, M., & Grasso, M. (Eds.). (2013). Elgar Handbook of Climate Change and Human Security. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  34. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., III, Lambin, E. F., et al. (2009). A Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Sengupta, M. (2019). Post-development: No Development Is Good Development. In J. Drydyk & L. Keleher (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Development Ethics (First ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Routledge, an imprint of Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  37. St. Clair, A. L. (2014). The Four Tasks of Development Ethics at Times of a Changing Climate. Journal of Global Ethics, 10(3), 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stewart, F. (2015). The Sustainable Development Goals: A Comment. Journal of Global Ethics, 11(3), 288–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved October 14, 2019, from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld.
  40. Unterhalter, E. (2012). Poverty, Education, Gender and the Millennium Development Goals: Reflections on Boundaries and Intersectionality. School Field, 10(3), 253–274.Google Scholar
  41. Waldmueller, J., & Rodríguez, L. (2019). Buen Vivir and the Rights of Nature: Alternative Visions of Development. In J. Drydyk & L. Keleher (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Development Ethics (First ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Routledge, an imprint of Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  42. Watene, K., & Merino, R. (2019). Indigenous People: Self-determination, Decolonization, and Indigenous Philosophies. In J. Drydyk & L. Keleher (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Development Ethics (First ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Routledge, an imprint of Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  43. Wood, G. (2003). Staying Secure, Staying Poor: The “Faustian Bargain”. World Development, 31(3), 455–471.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Copenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark
  2. 2.International Institute of Social StudiesThe HagueNetherlands

Personalised recommendations