Advertisement

Where Are Criteria of Human Significance in Climate Change Assessment?

Chapter

Abstract

How important are humanistic principles in assessments of climate change? Do we judge in terms of all the valued impacts on all people? The chapter identifies how interests of vulnerable poor people are often marginalized, even when assessments are made by agencies supposedly accountable within the United Nations system with its commitments to universal human rights and human security. A major case considered is the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (2014). A second example taken is the debate on climate change’s impacts on human health. The burden of proof in climate change politics has been placed on the side of those who warn of dangers, and the precautionary principle often becomes configured in favour of not risking disturbance to the privileged. The chapter generates a typology of ways in which vulnerable poor people are marginalized or excluded in climate change analyses. It then discusses how this marginalization and exclusion might be countered, including looking at the 2015 Papal encyclical on the environment, Laudato Si’, and asks whether attention to the excluded requires ontological reorientations of sorts that are not yet standard in human development discourse. It concludes by pointing towards how human rights and human security frameworks can contribute here.

References

  1. Adger, W. N. et al. (2014). Human Security. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 755–791). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, M., Frame, D., Huntingford, C., Jones, C., Lowe, J., Meinshausen, M., & Meinshausen, N. (2009). Warming Caused by Cumulative Carbon Emissions Towards the Trillionth Tonne. Nature, 458(7242), 1163–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alston, P., & Robinson, M. (Eds.). (2005). Human Rights and Development – Towards Mutual Reinforcement. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Archer, D., & Brovkin, V. (2008). The Millennial Atmospheric Lifetime of Anthropogenic CO2. Climatic Change, 90(3), 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birdsall, W. F. (2014). Development, Human Rights, and Human Capabilities: The Political Divide. Journal of Human Rights, 13(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deneulin, S. (2006). “Necessary Thickening” – Ricoeur’s Ethic of Justice as a Complement to Sen’s Capability Approach. In S. Deneulin, M. Nebel, & N. Sagovsky (Eds.), The Capability Approach: Transforming Unjust Structures. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Deneulin, S. (2012). Justice and Deliberation About the Good Life: The Contribution of Latin American buen vivir Social Movements to the Idea of Justice. Working Paper 17. Centre for Development Studies, University of Bath.Google Scholar
  8. Deneulin, S., Nebel, M., & Sagovsky, N. (2006). Introduction. In S. Deneulin, M. Nebel, & N. Sagovsky (Eds.), The Capability Approach: Transforming Unjust Structures. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dershowitz, A. (2004). Rights From Wrong: A Secular Theory of the Origins of Rights. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Fløttum, K., Gasper, D., & St.Clair, A. L. (2016). Synthesizing a Policy-Relevant Message from the Three IPCC “Worlds” – A Comparison of Topics and Frames in the SPMs of the Fifth Assessment Report. Global Environmental Change, 38, 118–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gasper, D. (1987). Motivations and Manipulations – Some Practices of Appraisal and Evaluation. Manchester Papers on Development, 3, 24–70.Google Scholar
  12. Gasper, D. (2007a). Human Rights, Human Needs, Human Development, Human Security. Forum for Development Studies, 34(1), 9–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gasper, D. (2007b). What Is the Capability Approach? Its Core, Rationale, Partners and Dangers. Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(3), 335–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gasper, D. (2008). From ‘Hume’s Law’ To Policy Analysis for Human Development – Sen After Dewey, Myrdal, Streeten, Stretton and Haq. Review of Political Economy, 20(2), 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gasper, D. (2014). Human Security Analysis as a Framework for Value-Oriented Governance – The Example of Climate Change. International Journal of Social Quality, 4(2), 6–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gasper, D. (2018). Insouciance, Indifference and Any Inspiration in the Face of Emergent Global Crises? In B. Jessop & K. Knio (Eds.), The Pedagogy of Economic, Social and Political Crises – Crisis Dynamics, Construals, and Lessons. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Gasper, D., Portocarrero, A. V., & St.Clair, A. L. (2013). The Framing of Climate Change and Development: A Comparative Analysis of the Human Development Report 2007/8 and the World Development Report 2010. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gibbons, E. (2014). Climate Change, Children’s Rights, and the Pursuit of Intergenerational Climate Justice. Health and Human Rights, 16(1), 19–31.Google Scholar
  19. Hansen, J., Sato, M., & Ruedy, R. (2012). Perception of Climate Change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(37), E2415–E2423.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205276109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansen, J., et al. (2015). Ice Melt, Sea Level Rise and Superstorms: Evidence from Paleoclimate Data, Climate Modeling, and Modern Observations that 2°C Global Warming Is Highly Dangerous. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15, 20059–20179.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-20059-2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Howard-Hassmann, R. E. (2012). Human Security: Undermining Human Rights? Human Rights Quarterly, 34(1), 88–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Inman, M. (2008). Carbon Is Forever. Nature Reports Climate Change, 2, 156–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2007). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report.Google Scholar
  24. IPCC. (2012). Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. IPCC. (2014a). Fifth Assessment Report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Including four component reports: (1) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis; (2) Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability; (3) Mitigation of Climate Change; (4) AR5 Synthesis Report.Google Scholar
  26. IPCC. (2014b). Summary for Policymakers. In C. B. Field et al. (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1–32). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. ISSC/UNESCO. (2013). World Social Science Report 2013 – Changing Global Environments. OECD-UNESCO Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Klein, N. (2015a). This Changes Everything. Penguin Books UK.Google Scholar
  29. Klein, N. (2015b). A Radical Vatican? New Yorker, July 10. http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/a-visit-to-the-vatican.
  30. Klein Goldewijk, B. (Ed.). (2007). Religion, International Relations and Development Cooperation. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Matthews, H. D., Gillett, N. P., Stott, P. A., & Zickfeld, K. (2009). The Proportionality of Global Warming to Cumulative Carbon Emissions. Nature, 459(7248), 829–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McMichael, A. et al. (2004). Global Climate Change. In M. Ezzati, A. D. Lopez, A. Rodgers, & C. Murray (Eds), Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease Due to Selected Major Risk Factors (Chapter 20, pp. 1543–1649). Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  33. Mignaqui, V. (2014). Sustainable Development as a Goal – Social, Environmental and Economic Dimensions. International Journal of Social Quality, 4(1), 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nolt, J. (2011). How Harmful Are the Average American’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Ethics, Policy & Environment, 14(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nolt, J. (2013). Replies to Critics of ‘How Harmful are the Average American’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions?’. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 16(1), 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Odenbaugh, J. (2011). This American Life. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 14(1), 27–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Patz, J. A., Campbell-Lendrum, D., Holloway, T., & Foley, J. A. (2005). Impact of Regional Climate Change on Human Health. Nature, 438, 310–317.Google Scholar
  38. Pope Francis. (2015). Laudato Si’ (Praise Be To You) – On Care For Our Common Home. Rome: Vatican.Google Scholar
  39. Ricoeur, P. (1996). Fragility and Responsibility. In R. Kearny (Ed.), Paul Ricoeur: The Hermeneutics of Action. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Rocca, S. (2014). Climate Change and Human Rights. Dissertation, The Hague: International Institute of Social Studies.Google Scholar
  41. Rocca, S., & Gasper, D. (2015). Is An Individual’s Impact on Health Harm via Climate Change Ethically Negligible? Final version of a report presented to CERES conference on The Right to a Sustainable Future, June 30, 2014, Utrecht University. In Semantic Scholar, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Is-An-Individual-%E2%80%99-s-Harmful-Impact-on-Human-Health-ROCCA-Gasper/8b7b9eddc3e83441ec4bdaa9f0cc8a89765f5e82 and https://repub.eur.nl/pub/77909/Metis_204229.pdf.
  42. Romm, J. (2015). James Hansen Spells Out Climate Danger Of The ‘Hyper-Anthropocene’ Age. Climate Progress, July 27. http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/07/27/3684564/james-hansen-climate-danger-hyper-anthropocene/.
  43. Scherer, G. (2012). Climate Science Predictions Prove Too Conservative. Scientific American. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-science-predictions-prove-too-conservative/.
  44. Shue, H. (2006). Ethical Dimensions of Public Policy. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy (Chapter 15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. St.Clair, A. L. (2014). The Four Tasks of Development Ethics at Times of a Changing Climate. Journal of Global Ethics, 10(3), 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change – The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tuana, N. (2013). Embedding Philosophers in the Practices of Science: Bringing Humanities to the Sciences. Synthese, 190(11), 1955–1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.
  49. United Nations. (2012). General Assembly Resolution 66/290, 2012 on Human Security: United Nations, A/66/L.55/Rev.1∗.Google Scholar
  50. Waldmueller, J. (2015). “Living Well Rather Than Living Better” – Measuring Biocentric Human–Nature Rights and Human–Nature Development in Ecuador. International Journal of Social Quality, 5(2), 7–28.Google Scholar
  51. WHO (World Health Organization). (2002). The World Health Report 2002. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  52. WHO (World Health Organization). (2014). Quantitative Risk Assessment of the Effects of Climate Change on Selected Causes of Death, 2030s and 2050s (S. Hales, S. Kovats, S. Lloyd, & D. Campbell-Lendrum, Eds.). Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  53. World Bank. (2010). World Development Report 2010: Development and Climate Change. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Institute of Social StudiesThe HagueNetherlands

Personalised recommendations