Skip to main content

The Role of Modern Ports and Marine Protected Areas in Eastmed’s Environmental Sustainability: The Case of Greece

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Operational Research in Agriculture and Tourism

Part of the book series: Cooperative Management ((COMA))

  • 334 Accesses

Abstract

Coasts are geographical areas that house many diverse activities, with direct impacts on the environment and the sustainable development of these regions. The concentration of these activities in a small spatial coastal zone creates significant pressures on marine ecosystems threatening further damage to habitats followed by potential loss of species and genetic diversity. Marine reserves and Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are considered important tools to address these threats to marine resources. Greece is one of the richest countries in marine biodiversity. It is a country with the longest coastline in the Mediterranean (about 15,000 km) and its coastal areas are of great economic, cultural and ecological interest. It is therefore obvious that marine/coastal and island habitats are, or should be, priority areas for Greece, regarding the focus of governmental support and protection, as well as strengthening stakeholder involvement procedures. This realization further enhances the need for developing and applying managerial and financial tools for lasting and sustainable development of coastal areas and Greek seas and thus the study of marine protected areas cannot ignore the ports operating in the surrounding region. A “traditional port” is a coastal marine area with a land zone artificially formed to provide the vessel with not only safe anchorage and mooring for loading and unloading operations, but also a point that can provide the best possible service to ships. Today, ports operate in an extremely competitive framework, continuously trying to reduce cost, increase productivity with simultaneous improvement of the services provided to users. The crucial question concerning the port lies in the fact that by trying to reduce cost, safety and environmental protection maybe partly sacrificed. Port authorities must therefore take all necessary measures to prevent the emergence of pollution (accident-related) or stemming from normal operation, which involves monitoring the frequency and consequences of accidents and other hazards, leading to the estimation of the risk of environmental pollution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Becker, N., & Chorosh, Y. (2010). Economic aspects of marine protected areas (MPA’s). Edited by: UNEP-MAP RAC-SPA, Tunis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, C. N., & Morri, C. (2000). Marine biodiversity of the Mediterranean Sea. Situations, problems and prospects for the future research. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40(5), 367–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, M., & Staffan, W. (2009). Fixing problems in fisheries – Integrated ITQs CBM MPAs in management. Marine Policy, 33(2), 258–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulling, M. T., Hicks, N., Murray, L., Paterson, D. M., Raffaelli, D., White, P. C. L., et al. (2010). Marine biodiversity–ecosystem functions under uncertain environmental futures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 2107–2116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. W. (1991). Tourism, environment, and sustainable development. Environmental Conservation, 18(3), 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coad, L., Campbell, A., Miles, L., & Humphries, K. (2008). The costs and benefits of protected areas for local livelihoods: A review of the current literature (Working Paper). Cambridge, UK: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. A. (1999). Limits to growth, sustainable development and environmental Kuznets curves: An examination of the environmental impact of economic development, sustainable development. Wiley Online Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contogiorgi, C. (2014) 1st Ecoports workshop on waste facilities. Viewed February 25, 2015, from http://ecoports.com/templates/workshop/PiraeusPortAuthority.pdf

  • De Marttino, M., & Morrillo, A. (2008). Activities, resources and inter-organizational relationships: Key factors in port competiveness. Maritime Policy and Management, 35(6), 571–589. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2014.v10n10p%25p.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducrotoy Jean-Paul. (2019). Threats to the coastal zone. Retrieved from http://www.coastalwiki.org/wiki/Threats_to_the_coastal_zone

  • ESPO: European Sea Port Organization. (2013). The environmental priorities of European ports for 2013. An analysis taking part size and geography consideration. Retrieved from http://ecoports.com/publications

  • European Commission. (2010). Maritime affairs and fisheries: Study on the economic effects of maritime spatial planning. Brussels: European Commission Marine Affairs and Fisheries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the Fisheries Management of the Fisheries Management (FAO). (2011). Marine protected areas and fisheries. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederigo, C. (2009). Marine protected areas: An essential tool for the future European maritime policy. UK: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galil, B. S., & Zenetos, A. (2002). A sea change – Exotics in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. In E. Leppäkoski, S. Gollasch, & S. Olenin (Eds.), Invasive aquatic species of Europe: Distribution, impacts and management. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greek Ministry of Tourism. (2017). Annual report about tourism in Greece. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/tourism/documents/annual-reports/index_en.html

  • Helpern, B. S., & Warner, R. R. (2002). Marine reserves have rapid and lasting effects. Ecology Letters, 5(3), 361–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (2010). The elusiveness of sustainability in tourism: The culture-ideology of consumerism and its implications. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 10(2), 79–115. https://doi.org/10.1057/thr.2009.31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillborn, R., Micheli, E., & De Leo, G. A. (2006). Integrating marine protected areas with catch regulation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 63, 642–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute European Environmental Policy. (2008). Marine protected areas in Europe and the United States. Edited by European Commission. Belgium: IEEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute European Environmental Policy. (2017). Socio economic benefits of the EU marine protected areas. London: Institute European Environmental Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, G., & Rechie, C. (1998, June). Lessons from marine protected areas around the world. Parks, 8(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, C. J., Chan, A., Kircher, L., Cundiff, A. J., Gardner, N., Hrovat, Y., et al. (2008). Striking a balance between biodiversity conversation and socioeconomic viability in the design of marine protected areas. Conservation Biology, 22, 691–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latchman, I. (2008). Marine protected areas, benefits and costs for islands. Zeist: WWF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law and Environment in Greece. (2017, October). WWF. Retrieved from http://www.wwf.gr/images/pdfs/WWF-NOMO-2017-%20Synopsis-EN.pdf

  • Leone, G. (2017). Mediterranean quality status report. U.N Environment programme. Mediterranean Action Plan (MAP), Barcelona Convection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maragou, P., & Legakis, A. (2009). The update of the Greek red data book of threatened fauna: Summary results and trends. Athens: Hellenic Zoology Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millazo, M., Chemello, R., Badalamenti, F., Camarda, R., & Riggio, S. (2002). The impact of human recreational activities in marine protected areas: What lessons should be learnt in the Mediterranean Sea? Marine Ecology, 23(1), 280–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. (1993). Biodiversity and the precautionary principle. Ambio, 22, 74–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeem, S., Thompson, L. J., Lawler, S. P., Lawton, J. H., & Woodfin, R. M. (1994). Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature, 368, 734–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, R., Balmord, A., Ferraro, P. J., Poalsky, S., Rickets, T. H., & Rouget, M. (2006). Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 681–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T., & Rodrigue, J.-P. (2005). Port regionalization: Towards a new phase in port environment. Marine Policy & Management, 32(3), 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palumbi, S. R. (2009). The ecology of marine protected areas. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokopiou, D. G., Tselentis, B. S., Mavridoglou, G., & Lagos, D. (2014). Prototype model of carrying capacity in tourism: The implementations for the Island of Rhodes. European Scientific Journal, 2, 434–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, P. (2012, April, 2). Tourism management in MPA’s as an economical way (p. 23). Medaset workshop, Milos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffman, D. (2018). We’ve only really protected 2 percent of the ocean. Retrieved from www.earther.gizmodo.com

  • The Greek Tourism Confederation (SETE). (2019). Retrieved from https://sete.gr/

  • Turley, C., & Gattuso, J.-P. (2012, July). WWF – Threats to oceans and coasts, Future biological and ecosystem impacts of ocean acidification and their socioeconomic policy implications. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(3), 278–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J., & Melillo, J. M. (1997). Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277, 494–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, R., Russ, G. R., Bucol, A. A., & Alcala, A. C. (2010). Shortcuts for marine conservation planning: The effectiveness of socio-economic data surrogates. Biological Conservation, 143, 1236–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolansky, E. (2017). Protective functions of coastal forests and trees against natural hazards. Townsville: Australian Institute of Marine Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L. J., Fish, L., Laughren, J., & Pauly, D. (2008). Assessing progress towards global marine protection targets: Shortfalls in information and action. Oryx, 42(3), 340–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Wildlife Fund. (2010). Conservation science program. Washington, DC: Society of Conservation Biology.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Basil Tselentis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tselentis, B., Pelagidis, T., Manologlou, S. (2020). The Role of Modern Ports and Marine Protected Areas in Eastmed’s Environmental Sustainability: The Case of Greece. In: Krassadaki, E., Baourakis, G., Zopounidis, C., Matsatsinis, N. (eds) Operational Research in Agriculture and Tourism. Cooperative Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38766-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics