Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Irish Perspective on Sustainable Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evaluating Sustainable Development and Corporate Social Responsibility Projects

  • 400 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter investigates the current status of sustainable development from an Irish perspective using qualitative analysis on data obtained from semi-structured interviews. The thirteen interviewees were chosen to represent a broad spectrum of influential organisations in Irish society and included private businesses, charity organisations, faith-based organisations, agricultural associations, and government representatives. Analysis of the findings confirmed that the three well-established vital elements that must be considered if organisations are to be developed in a sustainable way, namely, Profit, People, and Planet are still valid. However, this research also found that there were other elements necessary for developing sustainable organisations. To this end, a unique, sustainable organisational development theory emerged from the research findings of this study. This theoretical model identifies four specific vital components that are essential inputs to developing sustainable organisations. These four input components were deemed by the research subjects as critical elements in the ethos and policies of their organisations to maintain sustainability. They included a for-profit ethos, a not-for-profit ethos, an ethical/moral/spiritual ethos and government policy. The study found that organisational leaders guided by a robust moral/ethical compass who incorporate the input components of this model into their organisational vision and strategy maintain a strong focus on sustainable development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ali, M. A., & Jung, H.-J. (2017, April). CSR and the workplace attitudes of irregular employees: The case of subcontracted workers in Korea. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baqer, S. M. (2011, June). Hunting for true green consumers: A multicultural investigation of consumers’ genuine willingness to share the responsibility of saving the environment’. Global Conference on Business & Finance Proceedings, 6(2), 325–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict XVI. (2006). Deus Caritas Est [God is love]. Encyclical Letter of the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict XVI. (2009). Caritas in Veritate [Charity in truth]. Encyclical Letter of the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruntland Commission Report. (1987). World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnahan, S., Kryscynski, D., & Olson, D. (2015). How corporate social responsibility reduces employee turnover. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2015(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2015.14792abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choumert-Nkolo, J., Cust, H., & Taylor, C. (2019, May). Using paradata to collect better survey data: Evidence from a household survey in Tanzania. Review of Development Economics, 23(2), 598–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Akremi, A., Gond, J.-P., Swaen, V., De Roeck, K., & Igalens, J. (2018, February). How do employees perceive corporate responsibility? Development and validation of a multidimensional corporate stakeholder responsibility scale. Journal of Management, 44(2), 619–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315569311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibal with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Gabriola Island, BC: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eweje, G. (2011, May/June). A shift in corporate practice? Facilitating sustainability strategy in companies. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, 18(3), 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times, 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. J. G., Dutton, J. E., & Bartunek, J. M. (2000, December). Learning from academia: The importance of relationships in professional life. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1026–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2013). Available from http://www.un.org/climatechange/blog/category/ipcc/. Accessed on 24 February 2014.

  • Jamaludin, N. F., Hashim, H., Ab Muis, Z., Zakaria, Z. Y., Jusoh, M., Yunus, A., et al. (2018, February). A sustainability performance assessment framework for palm oil mills. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 1679–1693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kealy, T. (2014, April). Financial appraisal of a small scale wind turbine with a case study in Ireland. Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 8(4), 620–627. https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-8975/2014.04.004.

  • Kealy, T. (2017a, February). Stakeholder outcomes in a wind turbine investment; is the Irish energy policy effective in reducing GHG emissions by promoting small-scale embedded turbines in SME’s? Renewable Energy, 101, 1157–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.10.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kealy, T. (2017b, October). Does an embedded wind turbine reduce a company’s electricity bill? Case study of a 300-kW wind turbine in Ireland. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2837-44.

  • Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2005, February). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, K., Martinez, R. S., Ty, S. V., & McClain, M. B. (2013, June). Scientific research in school psychology: Leading researchers weigh in on past, present, and future. Journal of School Psychology, 51(3), 267–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mea, W. J., & Sims, R. R. (2019). Human dignity-centered business ethics: A conceptual framework for business leaders. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3929-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. The Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moger, P., & Bagley, C. (2019). A space for policy legacy: An ethnographic exploration of a secondary school’s commitment to creativity after national policy priorities have changed. Ethnography and Education, 14(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2917.1396544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panzaru, S., & Dragomir, C. (2012, December). The considerations of the sustainable development and eco-development in national and zonal context. Review of International Comparative Management, 13(5), 823–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peloza, J., Loock, M., Cerruti, J., & Muyot, M. (2012, Fall). Sustainability: How stakeholder perceptions differ from corporate reality. California Management Review, 55(1), 74–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandelands, L. E., & Hoffman, A. J. (2008). Sustainability, Faith, and the Market. Worldviews: Global Regions, Culture & Ecology, 12(2/3), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853508X359949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sautet, F. (2013, March). Local and systemic entrepreneurship: Solving the puzzle of entrepreneurship and economic development. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 37(2), 387–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2004). Elements of a theory of human rights. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32(4), 315–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, B. (1988). A reply to Thomas Mulligan’s “critique of Milton Friedman’s essay, ‘The social responsibility of business is to increase Its profits’”. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 537–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A. J. G., & Fontrodona, J. (2013). Participating in the common good of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 611–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staniskiene, E., & Stankeviciute, Z. (2018, July). Social sustainability measurement framework: The case of employee perspective in a CSR-committed organisation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 708–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, L. (2009). A study of current practice of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and an examination of the relationship between CSR and financial performance using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) (Doctoral thesis). Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, M. E., & Grim, J. (2007, Spring). Daring to dream: Religion and the future of the earth. Reflections—The Journal of the Yale Divinity School, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyagi, R., & Raju, J. (2018, June). The effect of entrant brand’s ownership on national brands’ positioning strategies. Management & Decision Economics, 39(4), 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Global Compact, in collaboration with BCG. (2014). Joining forces: Collaboration and leadership for sustainability (Research Report January 2015). MIT Sloan Management Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations—Global Corporate Sustainability Report (2013). Available from http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/global_corporate_sustainability_report.html. Accessed on 24 February 2014.

  • Wackernagel, M. (2002). Comments on draft GRI Sustainability guidelines. http://globalreporting.org/feedback/PublicComments2002/MathisWackernagel1.pdf. Accessed on 14 February 2005.

  • Whelan, K. (2014, March). Ireland’s economic crisis: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Macroeconomics, 39(Part B), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2013.08.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Y., Wang, C., Quan, Y., Wu, G., & Zhao, J. (2018, March). Urban sustainable development efficiency towards the balance between nature and human well-being: Connotation, measurement, and assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 519–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Technological University Dublin, City Campus, Dublin, Ireland

    Dr. Tony Kealy

Authors
  1. Dr. Tony Kealy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony Kealy .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kealy, T. (2020). An Irish Perspective on Sustainable Development. In: Evaluating Sustainable Development and Corporate Social Responsibility Projects. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38673-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38673-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38672-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38673-3

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation