Skip to main content

Warrants of Traffic Signals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 391 Accesses

Abstract

Traffic signals are like a piano. Well-tuned and on trained hand, beautiful music flows. However, improperly handled and on untrained hand, agitation and dissatisfaction frequently occur. Due to its nature of restrictive control, signalization has been widely viewed as the universal solution to intersection problems. When traffic signal control is justified and properly designed, it may achieve orderly traffic movement, reduce the frequency of certain types of accidents, and coordinate continuous flow of traffic. However, unjustified, poorly designed, or improperly operated traffic signals may reduce movement efficiency by increasing the frequency and severity of some types of accidents, reducing intersection capacity, producing excessive intersection delay, and encouraging disobedience to signal indications. The focus of this chapter is the need studies that warrant intersection signalization, while the rest of the book deals with traffic signal design to ensure safe and efficient traffic movement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) – Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), an agency of the U.S. Department of Transportation. URL: https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/pdfs/2009r1r2/mutcd2009r1r2edition.pdf.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

End-of-Chapter Problems

End-of-Chapter Problems

Hour

EB

WB

NB

SB

1

30

30

25

25

2

30

30

50

50

3

50

50

75

100

4

50

50

150

150

5

75

100

250

200

6

100

250

400

300

7

125

400

500

350

8

150

450

500

350

9

200

375

450

300

10

250

300

200

200

11

200

300

150

150

12

150

150

150

150

13

100

100

150

150

14

100

100

150

200

15

100

75

150

200

16

250

100

200

250

17

325

125

350

250

18

375

150

400

300

19

400

150

350

450

20

425

150

350

450

21

325

100

200

200

22

150

75

100

100

23

100

50

50

50

24

50

25

50

50

  1. 1.

    Given the intersection and data in this problem, determine whether the data support each of the signal warrants. For each warrant, indicate whether the warrant is:

    1. (a)

      met

    2. (b)

      not met

    3. (c)

      not applicable

    4. (d)

      insufficient information to assess.

    In the end, based on the above, indicate:

    1. (a)

      whether a signal is warranted,

    2. (b)

      the type of signalization that should be considered, and

    3. (c)

      whether pedestrian signals and/or push buttons are recommended.

      In all cases, assume that no warrants are met for the hours that are not included in the study data.

      figure l

      Note:

      Area Population: 75,000

      Approach Speeds: 35 mi/h

      Four-way STOP Control in place.

  2. 2.

    The intersection of Huntington Rd and Breckenridge Rd in Hadley, MA is under analysis for signalization. The figure below shows the location of the intersection and the next figure is a satellite image of the intersection. Currently, the intersection is controlled by four-way STOP signs. However, traffic demand as well as crash history at this location may warrant intersection signalization. As a transportation engineering professional, you are asked to conduct a signal warrant analysis study for the town.

    figure m
    figure n

    The following data were obtained from field data collection:

    1. (a)

      Traffic counts on an average day are listed in the table below. Note that the posted speed limit is 30 mph on major street and the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000.

      Time

      Major St EB

      Major St WB

      Major St total

      Minor St higher

      07:00 AM–08:00 AM

      455

      457

      912

      268

      08:00 AM–09:00 AM

      422

      408

      830

      218

      09:00 AM–10:00 AM

      341

      290

      631

      146

      10:00 AM–11:00 AM

      323

      258

      580

      165

      11:00 AM–12:00 PM

      355

      264

      619

      322

      12:00 PM–01:00 PM

      417

      276

      693

      152

      01:00 PM–02:00 PM

      395

      295

      690

      144

      02:00 PM–03:00 PM

      394

      291

      684

      183

      03:00 PM–04:00 PM

      470

      362

      831

      245

      04:00 PM–05:00 PM

      588

      433

      1021

      381

      05:00 PM–06:00 PM

      629

      440

      1069

      270

      06:00 PM–07:00 PM

      404

      359

      763

      164

      1. Note: 04:00–05:00 PM is peak hour
    2. (b)

      Crashes reported by the County Sheriff’s Office and State Patrol were assessed for the 3-year period starting January 1, 2017 and ending December 31, 2019.

      Year

      Angle

      Rear-end

      2017

      4

      0

      2018

      4

      2

      2019

      4

      3

    3. (c)

      Pedestrians crossing major street on the same day as above.

      Time

      Pedestrians

      07:00 AM08:00 AM

      10

      08:00 AM09:00 AM

      44

      09:00 AM10:00 AM

      82

      10:00 AM11:00 AM

      45

      11:00 AM12:00 PM

      19

      12:00 PM01:00 PM

      34

      01:00 PM02:00 PM

      89

      02:00 PM03:00 PM

      87

      03:00 PM04:00 PM

      39

      04:00 PM05:00 PM

      76

      05:00 PM06:00 PM

      58

      06:00 PM07:00 PM

      88

    4. (d)

      Hadley Middle School is located in this area and there are 15 schoolchildren crossing major street during the highest crossing hour on the same average day as above. A field study has been conducted during the 30-min period when the schoolchildren are using the crossing, and found that 35 adequate gaps are available during that period. Currently, schoolchildren cross the street on their own without any other remedial measures.

    5. (e)

      Since the intersection is located in an isolated area, it is not in coordination with any other traffic signals.

    6. (f)

      There is no railroad grade crossing near the intersection.

      Given the intersection and data in this problem, determine whether the data support each of the signal warrants. For each warrant, indicate whether the warrant is:

    7. (a)

      met

    8. (b)

      not met

    9. (c)

      not applicable

    10. (d)

      insufficient information to assess.

      In the end, based on the above, indicate:

    11. (a)

      whether a signal is warranted,

    12. (b)

      the type of signalization that should be considered, and

    13. (c)

      whether pedestrian signals and/or push buttons are recommended.

      In all cases, assume that no warrants are met for the hours that are not included in the study data.

  3. 3.

    Determine if the intersection described below justifies installation of a traffic signal based on the traffic volume criteria for Warrant 1, conditions A and B.

    1. (a)

      Major St. has two lanes in each direction

    2. (b)

      Minor St. has one lane per direction

    3. (c)

      Located in suburb of a major metropolitan area

    4. (d)

      Speed limit on both roads is 45 mph

      Identify how many hours are met for each warrant and clearly state your recommendations.

      Time

      Major St.

      Minor St.

      6–7 AM

      764

      139

      7–8 AM

      825

      161

      8–9 AM

      985

      76

      9–10 AM

      976

      56

      10–11 AM

      768

      63

      11–12 NOON

      904

      158

      12–1 PM

      689

      123

      1–2 PM

      645

      175

      2–3 PM

      706

      188

      3–4 PM

      928

      178

      4–5 PM

      943

      197

      5–6 PM

      950

      153

      6–7 PM

      910

      142

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ni, D. (2020). Warrants of Traffic Signals. In: Signalized Intersections. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38549-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38549-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38548-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38549-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics