Skip to main content

The LEADS in a Caring Environment Framework: Achieve Results

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bringing Leadership to Life in Health: LEADS in a Caring Environment
  • 1250 Accesses

Abstract

Achieve results is the most task-oriented of the five domains of the LEADS framework. Regardless of your role—CEO, mid-manager, front-line supervisor, clinician-leader, community or informal leader—using the Achieve results capabilities will help you clarify goals, set priorities, measure your effectiveness, stay on track, deal with inevitable surprises, take appropriate action to deal with shocks and be resilient enough to get right back on track. The Achieve results domain differs from the others in another important respect: its order matters. Much like the “Plan, Do, Study, Act” cycle,[the four capabilities of Achieve results work better together and work best when followed in sequence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Feser C, Mayol M, Srinivasan R. Decoding leadership: what really matters. McKinsey quarterly. New York, NY: McKinsey; 2015. https://leadershipcoaching.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Decoding-Leadership-What-really-works.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Minister of Health. Ministerial mandate letter. Minister of Health mandate letter. Ottawa, ON: Prime Minister of Canada; 2017. https://www.assembly.gov.nt.ca/sites/default/files/td_282-182.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schneider EC, Sarnak DO, Squires D, Sha A, Doty MM. Mirror, mirror. Washington, DC: Commonwealth Fund; 2017. https://interactives.commonwealthfund.org/2017/july/mirror-mirror/. Accessed 22 Aug 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Busby C, Muthukumaran R, Jacobs A. Reality bites: how Canada’s healthcare system compares to its international peers. Toronto, ON: C.D. Howe Institute; 2018. ebrief 271. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3112894. Accessed 22 Aug 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marchildon GP, Di Mateao L. Bending the cost curve in health care: Canada’s provinces in international perspective. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  6. White J. The mixed (de)merits of ‘bending the cost curve’. Health Affairs. 2011. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20110617.011786/full/. Accessed 18 Sep 2019.

  7. Pink D. Management is an outdated technology. Chicago, IL: Gaegen MacDonald; 2012. Video: 3 min. 36 sec. https://www.youtube.com/watch?.v=bgCdSnLrHJo. Accessed 22 Aug 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dan Pink shares 2 simple strategies for motivating employees. Business Insider, 13 Jan 2016. https://www.businessinsider.com/dan-pink-on-how-to-boost-team-performance-2016-1. Accessed 22 Aug 2019.

  9. Adam NR, Wieder R, Ghosh D. Data science, learning, and applications to biomedical and health sciences. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2017;1387:5–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weiser TG, Forrester JA, Negussie T. Implementation science and innovation in global surgery. BJS. 2019;106:e20–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Editorial. Implementation science and AOTJ’s role in bridging the occupational therapy best practice – actual practice. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019;66:127–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Holtrop JS, Rabin BA, Glasgow RE. Dissemination and implementation science in primary care research and practice: contributions and opportunities. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31(3):466–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharfstein JM. Accountability for health. Milbank Q. 2015;93(4):675–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Kerkvoorden D, Ettema R, Minkman M. Accountability in integrated health service delivery in the Netherlands, an evidence based integrated care approach. Int J Integr Care. 2019;19(4):285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Adeniran A, Likaka A, Knutsson A, Costella A, Daelmans B, Maliqi B, et al. Leadership, action, learning and accountability to deliver quality care for women, newborns and children. Geneva: World Health Organization. Bull WHO. 2018;96(3):222–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Porter ME, Lee TH. The strategy that will fix health care. Harv Bus Rev. 2013;2013:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Phipps-Taylor M, Shortell M. More than money: motivating physician behavior change in Accountable Care Organizations. Milbank Q. 2016;94(4):832–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor MJ, McNicholas C, Nicolay C, Darzi A, Bell D, Reed JE. Systematic review of the application of the plan–do–study–act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:290–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Canada Foundation for Healthcare Improvement. CFHI quality improvement primer. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement. https://www.cfhi-fcass.ca/sf-docs/default-source/on-call/primer-videos/qi-primer-pdsa-e.pdf?sfvrsn=368ad744_2. Accessed 22 Aug 2019.

  20. Kollenscher E, Eden F, Ronen B, Farjoun M. Architectural leadership: The neglected core of organizational leadership. Eur Manag Rev. 2017;14:247–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nightingale A. Developing the organisational culture in a healthcare setting. Nurs Stand. 2018;32(21):53–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Connell D, Hickerson OK, Pillutla A. Organizational visioning: an integrative review. Group Organ Manag. 2011;36(1):103–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110390999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dickson G, Tholl B, Baker GR, Blais R, Clavel N, Gorley C, et al. Partnerships for health system improvement, leadership and health system redesign: cross-case analysis. Ottawa, ON: Royal Roads University, Canadian Health Leadership Network, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research; 2014. http://tinyurl.com/qh6ogzu. Accessed 22 Aug 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kaplan R, Norton D. The execution premium. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lipton M. Demystifying the development of an organizational vision. Sloan Manag Rev. 1996. http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/demystifying-the-development-of-an-organizational-vision/. Accessed Aug 2013.

  26. Kennedy JF, John F. Kennedy moon speech. Houston, TX: Rice University; 1962. https://er.jsc.nasa.gov/seh/ricetalk.htm. Accessed 26 Aug 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Collins J, Porras JI. HAG—big hairy audacious goal. Jim Collins Articles. 2019. https://www.jimcollins.com/article_topics/articles/BHAG.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2019.

  28. Farson R. Management of the absurd: paradoxes in leadership. New York, NY: Touchstone; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Taylor C, Cornelius CJ, Colvin K. Visionary leadership and its relationship to organizational effectiveness. Leadership Org Dev J. 2014;35(6):566–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hoog E, Lyshom J, Garvare R, Weinehall L, Nystrong ME. Quality improvement in large healthcare organizations. J Health Organ Manag. 2016;30(1):133–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-10-2013-0209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. World Health Organization. WHO called to return to the Declaration of Alma-Ata. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. https://www.who.int/social_determinants/tools/multimedia/alma_ata/en/. Accessed 20 Aug 2019

    Google Scholar 

  32. World Health Organization. WHO 2000 millennium development goals. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. https://www.who.int/topics/millennium_development_goals/about/en/. Accessed 20 Aug 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  33. World Health Organization. WHO from MDGs to SDGs, WHO launches new report. 2015. https://www.who.int/en/news-room/detail/08-12-2015-from-mdgs-to-sdgs-who-launches-new-report. Accessed 20 Aug 2019

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wachter RM, Pronovost PJ. The 100,000 lives campaign: a scientific and policy review. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32(11):621–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kantabutra S, Avery G. The power of vision: statements that resonate. J Bus Strategy. 2010;31(1):37–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756661011012769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mayfield J, Mayfield M, Sharbrough WCIII. Strategic vision and values in top leaders’ communications: motivating language at a higher level. Int J Bus Commun. 2015;52(1):97–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Smith N, Mitton C, et al. High performance in healthcare priority setting and resource allocation: a literature- and case study-based framework in the Canadian context. Soc Sci Med. 2016;162:185–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Senge P. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Random House; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Government of Canada. A prescription for Canada: achieving Pharmacare for all; 2019. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/corporate/about-health-canada/public-engagement/external-advisory-bodies/implementation-national-pharmacare/final-report.html. Accessed 2 Aug 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dickson G, Waite G. Leading from the boardroom: bringing LEADS in a caring environment to Canadian healthcare boards. Ottawa, ON: HealthcareCAN; 2016. http://www.healthcarecan.ca/wp-content/themes/camyno/assets/document/Reports/2016/HCC/EN/Leading%20from%20the%20Boardroom%20mongraph_FINALv5.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Harvard Business School. Value-based health care. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School, Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness; 2019. https://www.isc.hbs.edu/health-care/value-based-health-care/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dickson G, Mutwiri B, Blakley B. The symbiotic relationship between Lean and LEADS. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Health Leadership Network; 2015. https://chlnet.ca/wp-content/uploads/LEAN-and-LEADS-Comparison-for-CHLNet-May-2015.pdf. Accessed 23 Aug 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Braithwaite J, Marks D, Taylor N. Harnessing implementation science to improve care quality and patient safety: a systematic review of targeted literature. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014;26(3):321–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Shortell SM, al e. Accountable health organizations: the national landscape. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015;40(4):647–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Saliba GN. Accountable care organizations. NJ Bus. 2014;60(9):41.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Canadian Patient Safety Institute and Health Standards Organization. The Canadian quality and patient safety framework for health and social services. Ottawa, ON: CPSI and HSO; 2019. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c42463a372b96e73b4ff935/t/5c6ffea0104c7b6ae28b05c4/1550843555878/CPSI01_DraftFramework_EN_F4.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schryvers P. Bad data. New York, NY: Prometheus Books; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kaplan R, Norton D. The execution premium: linking strategy to operations for competitive advantage. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  49. McDonald B. Bob McDonald profiles the extensive use of the Balanced Scorecard in numerous health jurisdictions in Australia and other developed nations. A review of the use of the balanced scorecard in healthcare. Inver Grove Heights, MN: BMcD Consulting; 2012. http://www.bmcdconsulting.com/index_htm_files/Review%20of%20the%20Use%20of%20the%20Balanced%20Scorecard%20in%20Healthcare%20BMcD.pdf. Accessed Aug 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bisognano M, Kenney C. Leadership for the triple aim. Healthc Exec. 2012;27(2):80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Cialdini R. The uses (and abuses) of influence, putting the pieces together. Harv Bus Rev. 2013;91:76–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Relias Media. Toyota situation is no reason to abandon Lean, say experts. Atlanta, GA: Relias Media; 2010. https://www.reliasmedia.com/articles/19507-toyota-situation-is-no-reason-to-abandon-lean-say-experts. Accessed 22 Jul 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Waddell K, Moat KA, Lavis JN. Evidence brief: preparing emerging leaders for alternative futures in health systems across Canada. Hamilton, ON: McMaster Health Forum; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graham Dickson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Achieves Results Self-Assessment (for on-line access to self assessment tool please visit www.LEADSglobal.ca.)

Achieves Results Self-Assessment (for on-line access to self assessment tool please visit www.LEADSglobal.ca.)

Informal leader (patient, family member, citizen) responsibilities

In order to be a goal-oriented leader, I

1.

Contribute to direction setting (vision and results) when asked; and/or suggest new directions when results for citizens are not optimal

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

2.

Ensure my input into decisions, pertaining to the organization or project’s direction, is in keeping with the vision, values, mission and available evidence

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

3.

Behave in a manner consistent with expectations as laid out in action plans for my area of interest and/or responsibility

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

4.

Participate in, or advocate for processes to measure, assess, and evaluate organizational/project performance; and monitor those results to determine course corrections

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

Front-line leaders

In order to be a goal-oriented leader, I

1.

Ensure there is a clear direction to be achieved by my unit; and that it is aligned with the organization’s vision and desired results

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

2.

Make decisions in my area of responsibility that align with the vision, values, or mission statement of the organization; and that are consistent with the direction and available evidence

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

3.

Take the actions necessary to keep me and my staff focused on the desired results for my unit

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

4.

Assess and evaluate the desired results of my unit’s work; and monitor those results to determine course corrections

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

Mid-level leaders

In order to be a goal-oriented leader, I

1.

Set direction for the department, in line with the organization’s direction, through operational plans that outline key milestones, timelines and expected results to be achieved by all units

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

2.

Make decisions, relative to my department’s responsibilities, that align with the vision, values, or mission statement of the organization; and that are consistent with available evidence

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

3.

Take the actions necessary to ensure ongoing availability of critical services in my department

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

4.

Ensure valid measurement tools are in place for assessing and evaluating my department’s responsibilities; and that are used to improve services when necessary

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

Senior leaders

In order to be a goal-oriented leader, I

1.

Set direction for my portfolio, in keeping with the organization’s vision and results, through strategies and metrics that will fulfill the key responsibilities of my portfolio

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

2.

Can clearly describe how current decisions in my strategic area align with overall organizational vision, values, mission, and relevant evidence

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

3.

Gain support of other senior leaders and staff for successful implementation of strategies, and for changes to those strategies when those changes are validated by new evidence

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

4.

Hold myself and others accountable for assessing and evaluating metrics consistent with our strategies, and monitor those results to determine course corrections and/or new directions

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

Executive leaders

In order to be a goal-oriented leader, I

1.

Collaborate with province, board, colleagues, and staff to create a compelling statement of values, vision, and desired results for the organization

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

2.

Develop strategic processes and plans that align strategies with the organization’s values, vision, available evidence and desired results; and that outline decisions for organizational improvement

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

3.

Provide necessary support (e.g. systems, processes, resources) for implementation of the organization’s strategic decisions

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

4.

Ensure that measures, benchmarks and targets are established to assess and evaluate desired results for the organization; and use them to course correct where necessary; or set a new direction for the organization

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 N

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dickson, G., Tholl, B. (2020). The LEADS in a Caring Environment Framework: Achieve Results. In: Dickson, G., Tholl, B. (eds) Bringing Leadership to Life in Health: LEADS in a Caring Environment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38536-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38536-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38535-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38536-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics