Skip to main content

Conclusion: Lessons Learned to Expand Frontier Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Frontier Making in the Amazon

Part of the book series: Key Challenges in Geography ((KCHGE))

  • 332 Accesses

Abstract

Informed by the theoretical and empirical considerations discussed earlier in the book, the final chapter revisits the claim that frontier making has always been fundamental for the circulation and accumulation of capital. The centrality of frontiers is not only due to the demand for minerals, land or other resources, or because frontiers represent fresh market opportunities, but also crucially because it operates as compensation for the saturation of the existing capitalist relations in core areas. At the frontier, the conventional sequence of time and space is suspended and reconfigured, allowing room for the decompression of tensions and contradictions. Consequently, spatial frontiers function as a mirror, where the most bare and explicit features of capitalism are vividly exposed. The final pages examine the meaning and immanence of spatial frontiers, considering them as a laboratory of the historical and geographical agency. It is an invitation for further work and a critical reflection upon the necessity, the configuration and the contestation of spatial frontiers, paying particular attention to the economic and territorial incorporation of the Amazon region and the prospects of political resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    And even beyond the Earth, as there have been serious attempts to bring capitalist relations to outer space, bypassing the 1967 international treaty, in order to mine asteroids and other planets (The Guardian 2015).

  2. 2.

    In his study on territorial conquest and European border disputes, Namier (1942: 69–70) perspicaciously observed that: “One would expect people to remember the past and to imagine the future. But in fact, when discussing or writing about history, they imagine it in terms of their own experience, and when trying to gauge the future they cite supposed analogies from the past: till, by a double process of repetition, they imagine the past and remember the future”.

References

  • Barbier EB (2012) Scarcity, frontiers and development. Geogr J 178(2):110–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolle W (2005) O Mediterrâneo da América Latina: A Amazônia na Visão de Euclides da, Cunha. Revista USP 66:140–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman I (1927) The pioneer fringe. Foreign Aff 6(1):49–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukharin N (1929[1917]) Imperialism and world economy. Martin Lawrence, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunker SG (1984) Modes of extraction, unequal exchange, and the progressive underdevelopment of an extreme periphery: the Brazilian Amazon, 1600–1980. Am J Soc 89(5):1017–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers SA (2011) Jacques Rancière and the Problem of Pure Politics. Eur J Polit Theory 10(3):303–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronon W (1992) Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. Norton and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha ERP (2005[1909]) À Margem da História. Academia Brasileira de Letras, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans R (2007) A history of Queensland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times (2018) Brazil: rainforest pays the price for the country’s crisis, 16 Jan 2018. https://www.ft.com/content/971f03aa-f9e0-11e7-9b32-d7d59aace167

  • Foweraker J (1981) The struggle for land. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2006[1982]) The limits to capital, new edn. Verso, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckenberger M (2005) The ecology of power. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemming J (1987) Amazon frontier: the defeat of the Brazilian Indians. Papermac, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan R (1985) The frontier as social control. Theory Soc 14(1):35–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioris AAR (2014) The political ecology of the state. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ioris AAR (2017) Places of agribusiness: displacement, replacement, and misplacement in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Geogr Rev 107(3):452–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioris AAR (2018a) Amazon’s dead ends: frontier-making the centre. Polit Geogr 65:98–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioris AAR (2018b) Place-making at the frontier of Brazilian agribusiness. GeoJournal 83:61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioris RR, Ioris AAR (2018) Colombia’s fractured history and continued challenges following the Havana accord. J Peace Build Dev 13(1):79–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones GS (2016) Karl Marx: greatness and illusion. Penguin, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Léna P (1986) Aspects the la Frontière Amazonienne. Cahiers des Sciences Humaines 22(3–4):319–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Little P (2001) Amazonia. Baltimore, John Hopkins

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund C, Rachman NF (2018) Indirect recognition. Frontiers and territorialization around Mount Halimun-Salak National Park, Indonesia. World Dev 101:417–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann G (2008) A negative geography of necessity. Antipode 40(5):921–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins JS (2009) Fronteira: A Degradação do Outro nos Confins do Humano. São Paulo, Contexto

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K (1973) Grundrisse (trans: Nicolaus M). Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K (1976[1867]). Capital, vol 1 (trans: Fowkes B). Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor M (2000) Feminism and environmental ethics: a materialist perspective. Ethics Environ 5(1):107–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namier LB (1942) Conflicts. Books for Libraries Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell G (1989[1937]) The road to Wigan Pier. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco de Oliveira J (2016) O Nascimento do Brasil e Outros Ensaios. Contra Capa, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Quaini M (1982[1974]) Geography and Marxism (trans: Braley A). Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen MB, Lund C (2018) Reconfiguring frontier spaces: the territorialization of resource control. World Dev 101:388–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rancière J (1998) Aux Bords du Politique. Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivière d’Arc H, Apestéguy C (1978) Les Nouvelles Franges Pionnières en Amazonie Brésilienne. Études Rurales 69:81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers TJ, Bain S (2016) Genocide and frontier violence in Australia. J Genocide Res 18(1):83–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santana JCB (2000) Euclides da Cunha e a Amazônia: Visão Mediada pela Ciência. História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos 6(suppl):901–917

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos M (1985) Espaço e Método. São Paulo, Nobel

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith G (1989) Livelihood and resistance. University of California Press, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JC (1985) Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of Peasant resistance. Yale University Press, New Heaven and London

    Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian (2015) Silicon Valley exploits time and space to extend the frontiers of capitalism, 29 Nov 2015. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/29/silicon-valley-exploits-space-evgeny-morozov

  • Turner FJ (1920) The frontier in American history. H. Holt and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein I (1974) The modern world-system I. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts MJ (2018) Frontiers: authority, precarity, and insurgency at the edge of the state. World Dev 101:477–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead N (ed) (2003) Histories and historicities in the Amazon. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield EG (1967[1834]) England and America. Augustus M. Kelley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Woollacott A (2015) Settler society in the Australian colonies. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Žižek S (2011) Hegel’s century. In: Žižek S, Crockett C, Davis C (eds) Hegel and the infinite. Columbia University Press, New York, pp ix–xi

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Augusto Rossotto Ioris .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ioris, A.A.R. (2020). Conclusion: Lessons Learned to Expand Frontier Theory. In: Frontier Making in the Amazon. Key Challenges in Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38524-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics