Advertisement

Cosmopolitan Norms and the Art of Deliberation: Beyond Forgiveness

Chapter
  • 87 Downloads

Abstract

In this chapter, we use Seyla Benhabib’s understanding of universalism that centres difference in conceptualising cosmopolitanism. Cosmopolitanism, following Benhabib, is more plausible if it invokes a conceptualisation of universalism that privileges subjectivities in the constitution of our individual and collective autonomy as humans. In this chapter, we contend that a difference-based notion of cosmopolitanism can guide democratic iterations underscored by communicative freedom. We specifically draw on Seyla Benhabib’s thoughts on democratic iterations to show how cosmopolitan human encounters might be extended further. Her view of democratic iterations is apposite to the cultivation of a cosmopolitanism-in-becoming in the sense that, as we shall show, iterations within themselves are both democratic and deliberative acts of human engagement—those acts of engagement that seem to be commensurate with cosmopolitan norms of human engagement.

Keywords

Universalism Difference Cosmopolitanism Subjectivities Individual Collective autonomy Humans Democratic iterations Communicative freedom Iterations Cosmopolitanism-in-becoming Human engagement 

References

  1. Benhabib, S. (2011). Dignity in adversity: Human rights in turbulent times. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  2. Code, L. (2012). Taking subjectivity into account. In C. W. Ruitenberg & D. C. Phillips (Eds.), Education, culture and epistemological diversity: Mapping a disputed terrain (pp. 85–100). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Derrida, J. (2010). On cosmopolitanism and forgiveness (M. Dooley & M. Hughes, Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Giroux, H. A. (2004). Critical pedagogy and the postmodern/modern divide: Towards a pedagogy of democratization. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(1), 31–47.Google Scholar
  5. Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kymlicka, W. (2002). Politics in the vernacular: Nationalism, multiculturalism and citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy need the humanities. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa
  2. 2.School of EducationUniversity of MalawiZombaMalawi
  3. 3.Department of AccountingUniversity of the Western CapeBellvilleSouth Africa
  4. 4.Centre for Innovative Learning TechnologyCape Peninsula University of TechnologyCape TownSouth Africa
  5. 5.Faculty of EducationCape Peninsula University of TechnologyMowbraySouth Africa

Personalised recommendations