Skip to main content

Amortizing Securities as a Pareto-Efficient Reward Mechanism

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Decision Economics: Complexity of Decisions and Decisions for Complexity (DECON 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1009))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

I propose a novel reward mechanism to promote monopoly-free innovations. Unlike the world’s patent systems, this mechanism is designed to reward any innovator with a government-issued innovation-backed amortizing security rather than with monopoly power, whereas the innovator must agree to place an otherwise exclusive innovation in the public domain so as to render a perfectly competitive market. Amortizing securities of this sort are tradeable and whoever holds them can receive a stream of time-contingent payouts from the government. Funded by a simple head tax, these payouts represent intertemporal prizes determined by a predetermined payout ratio and the innovative product’s overall market sales in a risky world. The proposed reward mechanism is Pareto-efficient and can be more feasible than the oft-discussed non-intertemporal cash prizes [4].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hopenhayn, H., Llobet, G., Mitchell, M.: Rewarding sequential innovators: prizes, patents, and buyouts. J. Polit. Econ. 114, 1041–1068 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones, C.I., Williams, J.C.: Too much of a good thing? The economics of investment in R&D. J. Econ. Growth 5, 65–85 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Judd, K.L.: On the performance of patents. Econometrica 53, 567–585 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wright, B.D.: The economics of invention incentives: patents, prizes, and research contracts. Am. Econ. Rev. 73, 691–707 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hwan C. Lin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lin, H.C. (2020). Amortizing Securities as a Pareto-Efficient Reward Mechanism. In: Bucciarelli, E., Chen, SH., Corchado, J. (eds) Decision Economics: Complexity of Decisions and Decisions for Complexity. DECON 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1009. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38227-8_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics