Advertisement

Mothering Bodies in Unloving Institutions

  • Louise Gwenneth PhillipsEmail author
  • Helen Johnson
  • Sarah Misra
  • Agli Zavros-Orr
Chapter
  • 56 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education book series (GED)

Abstract

Four mothers in academia collaboratively story their lived encounters, bringing differing identities, circumstances and experiences of collective exhaustion. They do this by creatively writing lived experiences, sharing these with each other, holding and feeling these lived encounters over time then creatively responding back with gifted crafted words and imagery. Reflection on these gifts and how they bring new insight to lived experiences create collated multi-vocal biographies. Through their collective arts-based poetic and visual inquiry, they see reflections and diffractions in each other’s lived stories that metaphorically provoke understandings of the pain swept into the unforgiving corners of cold, unloving universities. This work is creative resistance: to write from the body gives pearls of pleasure and joy in unloving institutions.

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2014). Selfcare as warfare. Retrieved from http://feministkilljoys.com/2014/08/25/selfcare-as-warfare/.
  2. Atwood, M., in Athill, D., Atwood, M., Barnes, J., Enright, A., Jacobson, H. Self, W., & Shriver, L. (2013, June 22). Falling short: Seven writers reflect on failure. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/jun/22/falling-short-writers-reflect-failure.
  3. Barad, K. (2012). On touching—The inhuman that therefore I am. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 23(3), 206–223.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, J. (2006). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Code, L. (1993). Taking subjectivity into account. In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2006). Doing collective biography. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fotaki, M., Metcalfe, B., & Harding, N. (2014). Writing materiality into management and organization studies through and with Luce Irigaray. Human Relations, 67(10), 1239–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fothergill, A., & Feltey, K. (2003). “I’ve worked very hard and slept very little” mothers on the tenure track in academia. Journal of Association for Research on Mothering, 5(2), 7–19.Google Scholar
  10. Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gilligan, C., Spencer, R., Weinberg, M. K., & Bertsch, T. (2003). On the listening guide: A voice-centred relational method. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 157–172). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gregory, H. (2014). “I will tell you something of my own”—Promoting personhood in dementia through performative social science. Forum: Qualitative Social Research/Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 15(3), Art 18. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2145.
  13. Grosz, E. (1993). Bodies and knowledge: Feminism and the crisis of reason. In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Grosz, E. (1995). Space, time and perversion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Hankinson Nelson, L. (1993). Epistemological communities. In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Held, V. (2005). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Isgro, K., & Castañeda, M. (2015). Mothers in US academia: Insights from lived experience. Women’s Studies International Forum, 64, 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson, H., Macaulay-Rettino, X., Banderob, S., Lalani, I., Carson-Apstein, E., & Blacher, E. (2018). A rose by any other name? Developing a method of ‘collaborative poetics.’ Qualitative Research in Psychology. Retrieved March 11, 2019 from  https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1442762.
  19. Johnson, H., & Wimpenny, K. (2018). Collaborative poetics network: A pilot study exploring the potential of collaborative, arts-based research. Paper presented at ABR5 Conference, Liverpool, UK. Retrieved March 11, 2019 from https://cdn.website-editor.net/ac799f292323416dab83fabe27a9e193/files/uploaded/Johnson%252C%2520H.%2520%2526%2520Wimpenny%252C%2520K.%2520U_Brighton%2520and%2520Conventry%2520%2528UK%2529.pdf.
  20. Mountz, A., Bonds, A., Mansfield, B., Loyd, J., Hyndman, J., Walton-Roberts, M., … Curran, W. (2015). For slow scholarship: A feminist politics of resistance through collective action in the neoliberal university. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 14(4), 1235–1259.Google Scholar
  21. Noddings, N. (2003). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. Phillips, M., Pullen, A., & Rhodes, C. (2014). Writing organization as gendered practice: Interrupting the libidinal economy. Organization Studies, 35(3), 313–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Phillips, L. G., & Zavros, A. (2012). Researchers as participants: Participants as researchers. In W. Midgley, P. Danaher, & M. Baguley (Eds.), The role of participants in education research: Ethics, epistemologies, and methods (pp. 52–63). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Potter, E. (1993). Gender and epistemic negotiation. In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2012). ‘Nothing comes without its world’: Thinking with care. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sjöö, M., & Mor, B. (1987). The great cosmic mother: Rediscovering the religion of the earth. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  27. Springgay, S. (2012). Tasting the m/other as a sensational pedagogy. In S. Springgay & D. Freedman (Eds.), Mothering a bodied curriculum: Emplacement, desire, affect. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  28. St Pierre, E., & Pillow, W. S. (Eds.). (2000). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Trafí-Prats, L. (2018). Mothering as a feminist aesthetics of existence. In C. Schulte & C. Thompson (Eds.), Communities of practice: Art, play, and aesthetics in early childhood. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Zavros, A. (2009, November 29–December 3). The emergent researcher: One woman’s journey into the Academy. In Australian Association for Research in Education Annual Conference Inspiring Innovative Research in Education. Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louise Gwenneth Phillips
    • 1
    Email author
  • Helen Johnson
    • 2
  • Sarah Misra
    • 3
  • Agli Zavros-Orr
    • 4
  1. 1.James Cook UniversitySingapore
  2. 2.University of BrightonBrightonUK
  3. 3.Staffordshire UniversityStoke-on-TrentUK
  4. 4.Independent AcademicMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations