Abstract
By the mid-1970s, the Total Condylar knee was one the most successful knees on the market in usage and performance. However there were two limitations: the range of flexion averaged only about 90 degrees, and there were cases of flexion instability due to loose collateral ligaments. At the Hospital for Special Surgery, where the Total Condylar originated, it was decided that a modification to the design was needed to solve the two problems. There were already several mechanical features in existing designs to suggest a possible configuration, including the Deane and Attenborough knees from England and the Kinematic Stabilizer from Boston. Insall and Burstein designed the posterior stabilized (PS) design, which had similar bearing surfaces to the Total Condylar but which had an intercondylar cam-post mechanism which operated after mid-flexion to cause rollback of the femur on the tibia. This design solved the limitations of the Total Condylar and started a new design type which became the most widely used of any other design. Today, the PS and a posterior cruciate retaining design type the CR are still the most widely used of any type of artificial knee. Recently, the Ultracongruent knee, essentially a Total Condylar type with more conforming bearing surfaces, is gaining some popularity due to providing the same control of anterior-posterior motion as the PS, but in a simpler design with less bone resection.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdeen AR, Collen SR, Vince KG. Fifteen-year to 19-year follow-up of the Insall-Burstein-1 total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2010;25(2):173–8.
Attenborough CG. Total knee replacement using the stabilized gliding prosthesis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1976;58:4–14.
Bartel DL, Rawlinson JJ, Burstein AH, Ranawat CS, Flynn WF. Stresses in polyethylene components of contemporary total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;317:76–82.
Burstein AH, Insall JN. Posterior stabilized total knee joint prosthesis. US Patent number 4,298,992. Filed 1980, issued 1981.
Deane G. New concept in total knee design. Conference on Total Knee Replacement. London: Institution of Mechanical Engineers; 1974. p. 16–8.
Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed-bearing total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:114–30.
Ehrhardt J, Gadinsky N, Lyman S, Markowicz D, Westrich G. Average 7-year survivorship and clinical results of a newer primary posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. HSS J. 2011;7:120–4.
Emmerson KP, Moran CG, Pinder IM. Survivorship analysis of the Kinematic Stabilizer total knee replacement: a 10- to 14-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg British volume. 1996;78(3):441–5.
Hofmann AA, Tkach TK, Evanich CJ, Camargo MP. Posterior stabilization in total knee arthroplasty with use of an ultracongruent polyethylene insert. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15(5):576–83.
Hofmann AA. The design principles of the Natural-Knee system. Am J Orthod (Belle Mead, NJ). 2010;39(6 Suppl):2–4.
Insall JN, Lachiewicz PF, Burstein AH. The Posterior Stabilized condylar prosthesis: a modification of the Total Condylar design. Two to four-year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(9):1317–23.
Lonner JH, Jasko JG, Bezwada HP, Nazarian DG, Booth RE. Incidence of patellar clunk with a modern posterior-stabilized knee design. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007;36(10):550–3.
Luger E, Sathasivam S, Walker PS. Inherent differences in the laxity and stability between the intact knee and total knee replacements. The Knee. 1997;4(1):7–14.
Lutzner J, Beyer F, Dexel J, Fritzsche H, Lutzner C, Kirschner S. No difference in range of motion between Ultracongruent and Posterior Stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(11):3515–21.
Robinson RP, Green TM. Eleven-year implant survival rates of the all-polyethylene and metal-backed modular Optetrak posterior stabilized knee in bilateral simulataneous cases. J Arthroplast. 2011;8(26):1165–9.
Scuderi GR, Norman W, Scott WN, Tchejeyan GH. The Insall Legacy in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2001;392:3–14.
Suggs JF, Hanson GR, Park SE, Moynihan AL, Li G. Patient function after a posterior stabilizing total knee arthroplasty: cam-post engagement and knee kinematics. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(3):290–6.
Walker PS, Shoji H. Development of a stabilizing knee prosthesis employing physiological principles. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973;94:222–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walker, P.S. (2020). Posterior Stabilized. In: The Artificial Knee. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38171-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38171-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38170-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38171-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)