- 316 Downloads
In this book, we deal with the epistemology of design. Epistemology is one of the grand terms of philosophy, where it means discourse about knowledge — usually about certainty, whether we can trust our senses, thoughts, and other pieces of knowledge. For us, two design researchers, the concept is more specific. We deal with epistemology in one particular context, constructive design research, in which design artefacts are vehicles of knowledge creation. In our work we have identified four epistemic traditions in constructive design research: (1) experiential; (2) methodic; (3) programmatic; and (4) dialectic. These are described in Chap. 3. Our aim is not to contribute to philosophy; our aim is to clarify how knowledge works in constructive design research. Rather than tightening the bridle this book is our attempt to maximize the freedom of research as it happens in constructive design research. The descriptions and methodologies provided in this book is our attempt to give research legitimacy to a cherished design practice we call drifting — however, drifting by intention.
- Bang, A. L., & Eriksen, M. A. (2014). Experiments all the way in programmatic design research. Proceedings of Nordic Design Research Conference, 2013. https://doi.org/10.14434/artifact.v3i2.3976.
- Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Blomberg, J., Giacomi, J., Mosher, A., & Swenton-Wall, P. (1993). Ethnographic field methods and their relation to design. In D. Schuler & A. Namioka (Eds.), Participatory design: Principles and practices (pp. 123–155). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Brandt, E., & Binder, T. (2007). Experimental design research: Genealogy, intervention, argument. Proceedings of International association of societies of design research, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
- Branzi, A. (2013). Seven degrees of separation. In The New Italian design (pp. 14–17). Milano: Triennale di Milano.Google Scholar
- Ehn, P. (1988). Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Stockholm: Arbetslivscentrum.Google Scholar
- Jan Pieter van, S., Elisa, G. (2017). The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/book/the-encyclopedia-of-human-computer-interaction-2nd-ed/research-through-design
- Keller, A. I. (2005) “For Inspiration Only: Designer Interaction with Informal Collections of Visual Material.”.Google Scholar
- Kensing, F., & Blomberg, J. (1988). Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7(3–4), 167–185.Google Scholar
- Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redström, J., & Wensveen, S. (2011). Design research through practice. From the lab, field, and showroom. Waltham: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
- Koskinen, I., & Krogh, P. G. (2015). Design accountability: When design research entangles theory and practice. International Journal of Design, 9, 121–127.Google Scholar
- Kurvinen, E. (2007). Prototyping social action. Helsinki: University of Art and Design Helsinki.Google Scholar
- Mattelmäki, T. (2006). Design probes. Aalto University.Google Scholar
- Mattelmäki, Tuuli, Kirsikka, V., and Ilpo, K. (2013). “What Happened to Empathic Design?” Design Issues 30, no. 1 (December 19, 2013): 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00249.
- Mattelmäki, T., & Visser, F. S. (2011). Lost in Co-X: Interpretations of co-design and co-creation. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on design research (pp. 1–12).Google Scholar
- Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2003). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Niedderer, K. (2004). Designing the performative object: A study in designing mindful interaction through artefacts. Plymouth: University of Plymouth.Google Scholar
- Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Redström, J. (2011). Some notes on programme-experiment dialectics. In Proceedings of Nordic design research conference. http://www.nordes.org/opj/index.php/n13/article/view/91.Google Scholar
- Sanders, E. B-N. (2005). “Information, Inspiration and Co-Creation.” In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the European Academy of Design. University of the Arts Bremen.Google Scholar
- Verganti, R. (2009). Design-driven innovation: Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
- Wensveen, S. (2005). A tangibility approach to affective interaction. Delft: Technical University of Delft.Google Scholar