Abstract
Government digitalization is becoming a mainstream of governance reforms with high expectations in terms of improving public value delivered by governments, raising both efficiency and effectiveness of public administration. Based on cross-country data, this paper presents a quantitative analysis of correlation between government digitalization on the one hand (based on UN E-government and E-participation indices and OECD statistics) and quality of public administration (measured by the WB’s governance indicators, Doing Business and WEF data) on the other. The results suggest that while there is statistically significant positive correlation between government digitalization and public administration performance, this relationship is stronger for government effectiveness, control of corruption, and doing business and weaker for e-participation, voice and accountability and efficiency of public spending. The findings suggest that there is direct cause and effect relationship between e-government development index and Doing Business measures. At the same time, surprisingly no direct cause and effect relationship was found between government digitalization and other governance indicators included in this study, such as government effectiveness and control of corruption. Thus, the benefits of businesses from government digitalization so far seem to be more evident than the gains of other beneficiaries. The paper concludes with analysis of some policy implications and recommendations on the directions of further research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bannister, F., Connolly, R.: ICT, public values and transformative government: a framework and programme for research. Gov. Inform. Q. 31(1), 119–128 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002
Bersch, K., Botero, S.: Measuring governance: implications of conceptual choices. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 26(1), 124–141 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2013.49
Burov, V., Petrov, M., Shklyaruk, M., Sharov, A.: Gosudarstvo kak-platforma: podhod k realizacii vysokotekhnologichnoj sistemy gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [Government as a platform: approach to implementing high tech system of public administration]. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba 20(3), 6–17 (2018). (in Russian)
Dobrolyubova, E., Alexandrov, O.: E-government in Russia: meeting growing demand in the era of budget constraints. In: Chugunov, A.V., Bolgov, R., Kabanov, Y., Kampis, G., Wimmer, M. (eds.) DTGS 2016. CCIS, vol. 674, pp. 247–257. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49700-6_23
Dobrolyubova, E., Alexandrov, O., Yefremov, A.: Is Russia ready for digital transformation? In: Alexandrov, D.A., Boukhanovsky, A.V., Chugunov, A.V., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O. (eds.) DTGS 2017. CCIS, vol. 745, pp. 431–444. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69784-0_36
Durkiewicz, J., Janowski, T.: Is digitalization improving governance quality? Correlating analog and digital benchmarks. In: Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Digital Government ECDG 2018, pp. 48–56. Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited (2018)
Garcia-Murillo, M.: Does a government web presence reduce perceptions of corruption? Inform. Technol. Dev. 19(2), 151–175 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2012.751574
Gartner: 5 Levels of Digital Government Maturity, 6 November 2017. https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/5-levels-of-digital-government-maturity/. Accessed 15 Dec 2018
Girish, J., Gulati, J., Williams, C.B., Yates, D.J.: Predictors of on-line services and e-participation: a cross-national comparison. Gov. Inform. Q. 31(4), 526–533 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.07.005
Heidelberg, C.A.: Citizens, not consumers. In: Weerakkody, V., Janssen, M., Dwivedi, Y. (eds.) Handbook of Research on ICT-Enabled Transformational Government: A Global Perspective. IGI Global (2009). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-390-6
Huque, A., Patamawadee, J.: The challenge of assessing governance in Asian states: Hong Kong in the Worldwide governance indicators ranking. Asian J. Polit. Sci. 26, 1–16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2018.1485587
Ivančić, L., Vuksic, V., Vugec, Dalia, S.: A preliminary literature review of digital transformation case studies. In: ICMIT 2018: 20th International Conference on Managing Information Technology, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 737–742 (2018)
Janssen, M., Estevez, E.: Lean government and platform-based governance-doing more with less. Gov. Inform. Q. 30, 1–8 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003
Krishnan, S., Teo, T., Lim, V.: Examining the relationships among e-government maturity, corruption, economic prosperity and environmental degradation: a cross-country analysis. Inf. Manag. 50(8), 638–649 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.07.003
Kossow, N.: Digitising the Anti-corruption sphere: taking stock and looking ahead (2018). https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/a7770504-e63d-4f96-9a50-9448b15c74c7.pdf. Accessed 08 Feb 2019
Lindgren, I., van Veenstra, A.F.: Digital government transformation: a case illustrating public e-service development as part of public sector transformation. In: DGO 2018 Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209302
Máchová, R., Lněnička, M.: Reframing E-government development indices with respect to new trends in ICT. Rev. Econ. Perspect. 15(4), 383–412 (2015)
Makowski, G.: From weber to the Web… can ICT reduce bureaucratic corruption? In: Paulin, A.A., Anthopoulos, L.G., Reddick, C.G. (eds.) Beyond Bureaucracy. PAIT, vol. 25, pp. 291–312. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54142-6_16
Margetts, H., Dunleavy, P.: The second wave of digital-era governance: a quasi-paradigm for government on the Web. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 371(1987) (2013). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382
Martin, A.: Digital literacy and the “digital society”. Digit. Literacies Concepts Policies Pract. 30, 151–176 (2008)
Mkude, C.G., Wimmer, M.A.: Strategic aspects for successful E-government systems design: insights from a survey in Germany. In: Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J., Wimmer, M.A., Bannister, F. (eds.) EGOV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8653, pp. 301–312. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44426-9_25
Müller, S., Abildgaard Skau, S.: Success factors influencing implementation of e-government at different stages of maturity: a literature review. Int. J. Electron. Gov. 7, 136 (2015)
National Audit Office: Digital transformation in government (2017). https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Digital-transformation-in-government.pdf. Accessed 08 Feb 2019
OECD Recommendation of the Council on Digital Government Strategies (2014). http://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/Recommendation-digital-government-strategies.pdf. Accessed 08 Feb 2019
OECD Government at a Glance 2017. http://www.oecd.org/gov/govataglance.htm. Accessed 08 Feb 2019
O’Reilly, T.: Government as a Platform. Innov. Technol. Gov. Glob. 6(1), 13–40 (2011)
Reis, J., Amorim, M., Melão, N., Matos, P.: Digital transformation: a literature review and guidelines for future research. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L.P., Costanzo, S. (eds.) WorldCIST’18 2018. AISC, vol. 745, pp. 411–421. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77703-0_41
Shounak, P.: Where can we improve? A cross-country comparison of factors affecting eGovernment success (2016). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2872178 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2872178. Assessed 08 Feb 2019
Srivastava, S., Thompson, T.: E-government payoffs: evidence from cross-country data. JGIM 15, 20–40 (2007)
Starke, C., Naab, T.K., Scherer, H.: Free to expose corruption: The impact of media freedom, internet access and governmental online service delivery on corruption. Int. J. Commun. 10, 4702–4722 (2016)
Stier, S.: Political determinants of e-government performance revisited: Comparing democracies and autocracies. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(3), 270–278 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.004
Thomas, M.: Eur. J. Dev. Res. 22, 31 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2009.32
UN E-Government Survey 2018. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2018. Accessed 08 Feb 2019
Westerman, G., Calmé, J.C., Bonnet, D., Ferraris, P., McAfee, A.: Digital Transformation: A Roadmap For Billion-Dollar Organizations, pp. 1–68. MIT Sloan Management, MIT Center for Digital Business and Capgemini Consulting (2011)
World Bank: Digital Dividends. World Development Report (2016) http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/896971468194972881/pdf/102725-PUB-Replacement-PUBLIC.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2019
World Bank: Worldwide Government Indicators (2018). http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#home. Accessed 30 Jan 2019
World Economic Forum: The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2017-2018. Accessed 30 Jan 2019
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dobrolyubova, E., Klochkova, E., Alexandrov, O. (2019). Digitalization and Effective Government: What Is the Cause and What Is the Effect?. In: Alexandrov, D., Boukhanovsky, A., Chugunov, A., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O., Musabirov, I. (eds) Digital Transformation and Global Society. DTGS 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1038. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37858-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37858-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37857-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37858-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)