Advertisement

Researching in Undergraduate Mathematics Education: Possible Directions for Both Undergraduate Students and Faculty

Chapter
  • 412 Downloads
Part of the Foundations for Undergraduate Research in Mathematics book series (FURM)

Abstract

Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (RUME) is a new field to both mathematics and mathematics education. It borrows theory and methodology from other disciplines including psychology, sociology, and neurology. At its core, RUME is attempting to find out about the teaching and learning of undergraduate mathematics education in order to improve it. In this book chapter, I attempt to give a quick overview on how to conduct RUME with undergraduate students. I pull from my experiences as a mentor of ten undergraduate projects. There is also a suggested timeline of RUME in a semester, some ways to generate RUME open questions, and a large amount of open questions conjectured by others. My hope is that this book chapter has information for both mentors and undergraduates alike.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thank you to the editors for even considering me; it was an honor. Thank you to Emily Cilli-Turner and Estrella Johnson for reading and making comments prior to submission while always being supportive. I am always indebted to my advisors for their support and care for my professional well-being, while allowing me to be myself throughout this academic journey. Finally, to my family; they are my energy, life, and love.

References

  1. 1.
    Bagnasco, A., Galaverna, L., Aleo, G., Grugnetti, A. M., Rosa, F., Sasso, L.: Mathematical calculation skills required for drug administration in undergraduate nursing students to ensure patient safety: A descriptive study: Drug calculation skills in nursing students. Nurse Ed. in Prac., 16(1), 33–39. (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chesebro, J. W., Borisoff, D. J.: What makes qualitative research qualitative? Qual. Res. Rep. in Comm., 8(1), 3–14. (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative. Available at https://about.citiprogram.org/en/homepage/
  4. 4.
    Cook, J. P.: Monster-Barring as a Catalyst for Bridging Secondary Algebra to Abstract Algebra. In N. Wasserman (ed.), Connecting Abstract Algebra to Secondary Mathematics for Secondary Mathematics Teachers, (pp. 47–70). Springer, Cham. (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ellis, J. Cooper, R.: Gender, switching, and student perceptions of Calculus I. In T. Fukawa-Connelly, N. Infante, M. Wawro, & S. Brown (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 125–135). Pittsburgh, PA (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ellis, J., Fosdick, B. K., Rasmussen, C.: Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM pipeline after calculus compared to men: Lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PLoS One, 11(7), e0157447 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Emigh, P. J., Manogue, C. A.: Student Interpretations of Partial Derivatives. In Proceedings of the 2017 Physics Education Research Conference. ComPADRE (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grootenboer, P., Marshman, M.: Mathematics, Affect and Learning: Middle School Students? Beliefs and Attitudes About Mathematics Education. Springer (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hopko, D.R., Mahadevan, R., Bare, R.L., Hunt, M.K.: The abbreviated math anxiety scale (AMAS) construction, validity, and reliability. Assessment, 10(2), 178–182. (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Larnell, G. V.: More than just skill: Examining mathematics identities, racialized narratives, and remediation among black undergraduates. J. for Res. in Math. Ed., 47(3), 233–269. (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leyva, L. A.: Unpacking the male superiority myth and masculinization of mathematics at the intersections: A review of research on gender in mathematics education. J. for Res. in Math. Ed., 48(4), 397–433. (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liljedahl, P.: The AHA! experience: Mathematical contents, pedagogical implications. Doctoral dissertation. Simon Frasier University, Vancouver (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lithner, J.: Mathematical reasoning in calculus textbook exercises. J. of Math. Beh., 23(4), 405–427. (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, Y., Ferrell, B., Barbera, J., Lewis, J.E.: Development and evaluation of a chemistry-specific version of the academic motivation scale (AMS-Chemistry). Chem. Ed. Res. and Prac., 18(1), 191–213. (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Melhuish, K.: Three conceptual replication studies in group theory. J. for Res. in Math. Ed., 49(1), 9–38. (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mkhatshwa, T., Doerr, H. M.: Opportunity to learn solving context-based tasks provided by business calculus textbooks: An exploratory study. In T. Fukawa-Connelly, N. Infante, M. Wawro, & S. Brown (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 1124–1132). Pittsburgh, PA (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nusbaum, N. J.: Perspectives: mathematics preparation for medical school: do all premedical students need calculus? Teach. Learn. Med., 18, 165–168. (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pajares, M. F.: Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Rev. of Ed. Res., 62(3), 307–332. (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ryan, R., Deci. E.: Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. Am. Psyc., 55, 68–78. (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saldaña, J.: The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Savic, M.: The incubation effect: How mathematicians recover from proving impasses. J. of Math. Beh., 39, 67–78. (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Savic, M., Martin, P.: The perceived vs. actual use of mathematics in medicine according to pre-medicine students and practicing physicians. Tea. Math. and Its App. (2017) doi:  https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrx011
  23. 23.
    Selden, A.: A home for RUME: The story of the formation of the Mathematical Association of America’s Special Interest Group on Research in Mathematics Education. Technical Report 2012-6, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN, USA. (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Selden, A., Selden, J.: Collegiate mathematics education research: What would that be like? The Col. Math. J., 24(5), 431–445. (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sio, U. N., Ormerod, T. C.: Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psyc. Bull., 35, 94–120. (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Speer, N., Kung, D.: The complement of RUME: What’s missing from our research? In T. Fukawa-Connelly, N. Infante, M. Wawro, & S. Brown (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 1288–1295). Pittsburgh, PA (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Steffe, L. P., Thompson, P. W.: Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A.E. Kelly, R.A. Lesh (eds.) Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education, (pp. 267–306). Routledge. (2000)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Swinyard, C. A., Lockwood, E.: Research on students’ reasoning about the formal definition of limit: An evolving conceptual analysis. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (CRUME2007). (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tallman, M. A., Carlson, M. P., Bressoud, D. M., Pearson, M.: A characterization of calculus I final exams in US colleges and universities. Int. J. of Res. in Und. Math. Ed., 2(1), 105–133. (2016)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tudge, J. R., Winterhoff, P. A.: Vygotsky, Piaget, and Bandura: Perspectives on the relations between the social world and cognitive development. Human Dev., 36(2), 61–81. (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations